Fake News: Washington Post Attempts To Protect All Those Rapey Refugees In Europe

As you surely know by now, there has been quite an epidemic of crime in European nations from all the Middle Eastern and African migrants (refugees, whatever) who have streamed into the nations over the past 10-20 years, and especially in the past few years. Sexual assaults, including rape, along with misogynistic attitudes (the real ones, not the ones that invoke the patriarchy because a guy pees standing up), have skyrocketed, and, usually, these are things that hardcore Liberals are over-the-top concerned with, beyond the normal outrage and concern most people have.

But, here’s the thing: in Leftist dogma, Women take a back seat to Muslims, even the violent and/or hardcore (Islamists) ones. At no point is it allowable to point at the small section of Muslims who are a problem. It’s perfectly OK to blame all Conservatives, Christians, Jews, etc, for the failings of a few. But not Muslims. So, we end up with this:

27% of Europeans say rape may be acceptable in some circumstances

A rape victim was drunk? He or she flirted beforehand or wore “revealing” clothing? In some European countries, up to 55 percent of the population says such circumstances would make sexual intercourse without consent justifiable or acceptable, according to a survey conducted on behalf of the European Commission. Overall, about one-fourth — 27 percent — of all Europeans held that opinion.

The number is much higher in Eastern and Central European nations such as Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. In Romania, more than 50 percent of all respondents said nonconsensual sexual intercourse was acceptable in some circumstances. Although there was a clear divide between Eastern and Western Europe, geography alone does not explain the striking differences. (snip)

The E.U. report comes amid growing concern about recent sexual assaults in European countries by refugees or immigrants. In Germany, mass sexual assaults this past New Year’s Eve led to a stricter sexual-assault law that also eased deportation rules for refugees convicted of sex-related offenses.

And that’s the point of the survey: to absolve all these sexual assulty and rapey “refugees” of their crimes by saying that so many Europeans have the same attitudes.

Of course, there’s one problem: the Europeans aren’t exactly acting on these beliefs like the “rapeugees”. But, that doesn’t matter, because the idea is to say that Europeans are no better than all the criminal and rapey refugees streaming into Europe.

I assume the article came from this survey, which, interestingly, provides no breakdown on the religion or nationality of the 30,000 supposedly surveyed. And this would all be the type of “fake news” the MSM is whining about.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

26 Responses to “Fake News: Washington Post Attempts To Protect All Those Rapey Refugees In Europe”

  1. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    There is absolutely no reason for a moslem to be here. They have zero in common with American life, culture, law, religion, history, society, morals, education, tradition, government or meritocracy. I have studied Islam, moslem law and moslem culture for over fifteen years and the only reason they come here is to infiltrate our society to secure its over throw.

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dgktJ4TnNho/WDRXogcmVnI/AAAAAAABDgA/EMEWlc4Z60kRUkWg8u3U1tL6aZipoL3ZwCLcB/s1600/Muslim-Rape-Culture.jpg

  2. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    I am amused at Jeffery’s love of moslems and deathly fear of Christians. In the moslem world the order of execution is:

    1. Apostates
    2. Atheists and agnostics
    3. Homosexuals and lesbians
    4. Jews
    5. Christians
    6. Other religious people

    In their world Jeffery is #2 on their death list (Maybe #2 and #3)

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-wlFzx-3iYjw/WCsMb9F3i0I/AAAAAAABDUE/t4xU3HoVI5MlHvc3NoE4XGe5R-DpOdVWgCLcB/s640/cair-ad-768×521.png

  3. Trish McNamara says:

    The fact that 27% of soon to be gone Europeans are okay with ANY form of sexual assault, is disgusting. They will soon get what they want and deserve, to disappear into their self made minority.

  4. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    Trish, you’ll get used to Jeffery. He’s deranged to begin with but once Trump Derangement Syndrome took over his brain the insanity metastasized. Then he saw Klepto Kliiary without makeup and realized she was as ugly outside as she is inside. It was then Jeffery’s rubber band broke. But it’s been fun for us to watch. Hell, we lost another crazy leftist John, completely. That poor batshit crazy putz hasn’t been heard from since election eve.

  5. drowningpuppies says:

    Hell, we lost another crazy leftist John, completely. That poor batshit crazy putz hasn’t been heard from since election eve.

    One hears that the electroshock therapy is going well.

  6. drowningpuppies says:

    Speaking of crazy, haven’t seen that Zach character around here lately.

  7. Jeffery says:

    Rev Mohammed,

    We’re flattered by all your attention. We hadn’t even made a comment on this thread and you’ve cited us in 66.6% of your comments! You’re clearly obsessed with us. Hahahaha. We are imbedded in your shrinking old man brain. What do you have left, 4 maybe 5 synapses? Hahahaha.

    Perhaps you’re not familiar with America and our Constitution. Here’s a primer:

    http://usconstitution.net/const.html

    The Constitution for Kids is a good start for someone as simple and inexperienced as you.

    We don’t love Muslims any more than we love Christians, Buddhists, atheists or Hindus! We think all religions based on supernatural beliefs are silly, but we understand why the weak-minded cling to their magical worlds.

    Here’s what our 1st Amendment says:

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Although you are absolutely within you rights to criticize Islam (as I do) and Muslims, there is currently no provision from excluding Muslims from American life based on their rather silly beliefs. That is, no legal provision. Our Constitution guarantees their right to practice their faith. Would the world be better without Islam? Of course! Just as it would be better without Christianity, especially the hate-filled brand of Christianity practiced by the likes of American fundamentalists. If humankind survives another 1000 years, perhaps our need to believe in magic will have been replaced with rational thought by the process of natural selection.

    Would you round up and deport all Muslims? Lock them up? Kill them? What is your plan for dealing with Muslims?

  8. drowningpuppies says:

    What is your plan for dealing with Muslims?

    Send ’em to St. Louis.
    Well, the extreme ones at least.

  9. gitarcarver says:

    We think all religions based on supernatural beliefs are silly, but we understand why the weak-minded cling to their magical worlds.

    So first your wife was delusional and now you call her “weak-minded?”

    Such love you must have for her.

    Now to your snarky response on the Constitution. As one who seeks to limit speech and the right to bear arms, it is odd that you would bring forth the Constitution. Perhaps that is just you being your typical hypocritical self.

    However, as famously stated in Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, “the Constitution is not a suicide pact.”

    That is to say that those who seek to destroy the country and the natural / God given freedoms of its citizens need not sit idly by while that destruction takes place. It can be argued that those who do not believe in the Constitution and seek to destroy it should not be granted it’s protections. That’s a far reaching notion and one that I am not willing to go down.

    However, despite your simple citation of the First Amendment, it is not absolute. The government has the right and the ability to restrict speech and religion when there is a compelling governmental interest.

    It is impossible to argue that protecting peaceful citizens who are subject to attacks based on the religious beliefs of a sect is not a compelling government interest.

    Does that mean that we should deport or make the life of all Muslims difficult? No. Not at all. But the US should restrict the actions and rhetoric that directly threaten people and the safety of the nation based on their religious beliefs.

  10. Jeffery says:

    Rev Mohammed is obsessed with me and guttercleaner is obsessed with my wife! What a pair they make. Two smelly old men who lie with each other.

  11. Hank_M says:

    No one is obsessed with you jeffrey. It’s just that no one can believe the moronic and juvenile stuff you write. Get help. You need it.

  12. gitarcarver says:

    Rev Mohammed is obsessed with me and guttercleaner is obsessed with my wife!

    Once again we see that a leftist is unconcerned with the treatment and abuse of women.

    I can’t imagine ever calling my wife “delusional” or “weak-minded.”

    For Jeffery, that is just a normal day.

    It’s also interesting to note that he never really addresses what he has said and done. Instead of being a man and an adult, Jeffery lashes out like a child.

  13. Jeffery says:

    I can’t imagine gutter ever having a wife. At least a voluntary one.

    It’s also interesting to note that he never really addresses what he has said and done. Instead of being a man and an adult, gutter lashes out like a trump.

  14. Jeffery says:

    hankm,

    No, it’s pretty obvious that some commenters here just can’t quit me.

    They used to relate lame factoids as truths but after getting beat up once too often they decided it was easier to mud wrestle.

    Whatever… in a couple of years the idea of truth will be a quaint artifact of a bygone era. Yesterday Scotty Nell Hughes, described as a trump spokesperson, stated there are no longer objective facts – her evidence was that since so many people believe trump’s false claim about illegal voters is true – it has become a fact! Newt Gettinrich made the same observation regarding the malleable nature of “facts” over a decade ago.

  15. gitarcarver says:

    I can’t imagine gutter ever having a wife. At least a voluntary one.

    It’s also interesting to note that he never really addresses what he has said and done. Instead of being a man and an adult, gutter lashes out like a trump.

    Once again, Jeffery lashes out at others for his lack of morals and ethics.\

    Maybe next he’ll start resorting to doing something really childish like changing commenter’s names because that shows how mature he is.

    Or maybe he will show his supposed employees how he feels about their beliefs.

    Or maybe he’ll let his wife in on how he really thinks about her. Or tell his supposed children what he thinks of their mother.

    Nah.

  16. Jeffery says:

    Once again, gutter lashes out at others for his lack of morals and ethics.

  17. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    What is your plan for dealing with Muslims?

    You should be much more concerned with how the moslems plan to deal with the likes of you. Remember, we Jews an Christians are considered “People of the Book” by moslems, you atheists are fair game. If you spent some time learning about moslems, Islam, the Koran , the hadith and Sharia Law the actual Body of Islamic Law, you wouldn’t sound like an idiot when you defend them. I know those fundamentalist Christians scare you to death what with all their proselytizing and such but a practicing moslem will have your head before you can say Allahu Akbar.

  18. gitarcarver says:

    Once again, gutter lashes out at others for his lack of morals and ethics.

    It so cute when Jeffery thinks he is making some sort of argument and instead is just being pathetic.

    So Jeffery….have you told your wife you think she is delusional and weak-minded?

    Yes or no?

  19. Jeffery says:

    Rev Mohammed,

    We are proud to defend Muslims from the likes of you. You’re an anti-America bigot.

    We understand that you are afraid. We also understand that people are dangerous when they are afraid.

    While we appreciate your concern for the intactness of our necks, we suspect your motives for wanting to oppress Muslims is more related to religious bigotry than concern for your fellow man.

    Or you are just scared shitless. Are you REALLY terrified that knife wielding Muslims are going to start beheading the citizenry?

    Anyway, my question was what you propose be done with the 6 million on so Muslims in the US now? Internment? Deportment? Ridicule?

  20. drowningpuppies says:

    You’ll defend no one, you little gutless liar.
    Tell us why you lied about serving in the Army.
    You can’t even do that.
    Go away, you little pussy.

  21. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    As a twice wounded, thrice decorated veteran of the Vietnam war I will not dignify your cowardly tirade of name calling and false accusations. Your guesses, suppositions and false projections of my motivations once again belie the cold cowardliness of your empty soul. Being a moslem does not give one the right to subvert our country, culture and laws nor does their religion defend them against the dictatorial theocracy it practices within.

    As I stated, you are completely ignorant of Islam and therefore have no reliability about it. You’re a useful idiot being lead to slaughter because you fear truth and hate America. I think the smelly pig losing made you go insane. Hahahahaha.

    https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-dgktJ4TnNho/WDRXogcmVnI/AAAAAAABDgA/EMEWlc4Z60kRUkWg8u3U1tL6aZipoL3ZwCLcB/s1600/Muslim-Rape-Culture.jpg

  22. gitarcarver says:

    What a shock. Jeffery won’t answer whether he told his wife that he considers her “delusional” and “weak minded.”

    Maybe it is just another case of a leftist abusing a woman.

    However, while Jeffery touts the peacefulness of certain sectors of the population, he fails to note that St Louis has the most violent crime in the country.

    Is there a correlation? Maybe. Maybe not.

    But similar spikes have been seen in other cities around the world where there is a large influx of refugees and immigrants who do not believe in the culture of the country to which they are entering.

    Does this mean all people of a certain nationality or faith are a problem? Absolutely not. Yet while Jeffery and his ilk like to make brash claims about the right, they fail to address the very real issue of preventing violence in cities that have taken in refugees.

    Of course, it should be noted that one of the high crime stats St Louis suffers from is rape and domestic abuse – things with which Jeffery is very well acquainted with.

  23. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    Some of Jeffery’s friends:

    BY
    Meg Wagner

    follow

    NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

    Thursday, December 1, 2016, 10:36 AM

    One of the terrorists who slaughtered 14 people at a California office’s holiday party was furious that her Muslim husband had to attend the festive luncheon, which was studded with Christmas decorations, police said.

    Days before San Bernardino health inspector Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, launched their grisly terror attack on the county health department’s holiday celebration, Malik wrote online that she didn’t feel it was appropriate to mix work and holidays.

    It’s the one year anniversary. Jeffery, you can go on Google and get all the moslem terrorist attacks per month. There are thousands so far this year. That’s thousands Jeffery. That makes it millions more than those committed by fundamentalist Christians in the name of Jesus.

  24. Jeffery says:

    A plethora of hissy fits! Wow boyz, we’re flattered, if not creeped out by all the attention, bordering on obsession. Like your newly anointed god-king you just can’t stand to be challenged!

    One commenter accuses Muslims of increasing the crime rate, especially domestic abuse and sexual assault. Do we need to go on? OK. Your god-king has been accused by 12 women of sexual assault including the rape of 14 year old girl. His original ex-wife accused him of domestic abuse in court papers. According to the reasoning the commenter uses, this can only mean one thing. TheDon is a Muslim!!

    We understand why you mud wrestlers are unwilling to discuss issues – but just once could you address how the US should deal with the 6 million or so Muslims in America? We can all agree that people committing crimes should be incarcerated or removed.

    Would you, Rev, who believes that Islam has the elimination of all non-Muslims at its core, advocate taking action against US Muslims? If so, what would that action be?

  25. Jeffery says:

    Rev Bigot,

    Your own typings confirm that you’re a religious bigot. Religious bigotry is anti-America regardless of your claims of heroism.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    It’s ironic that suddenly the right sees our Constitution as a “living document”. Hahahaha

    You might be afraid of Islam and middle easterners and Africans but that doesn’t excuse bigotry and oppression.

  26. gitarcarver says:

    One commenter accuses Muslims of increasing the crime rate, especially domestic abuse and sexual assault.

    Showing that you can’t read again Jeffery?

    There have been increases in rape and domestic abuse in cities where large influxes of refuges have taken place.

    As I said, “is there a correlation? Maybe. Maybe not.”

    There is no accusation other than the statement of facts which you do not address.

    Your god-king has been accused by 12 women of sexual assault including the rape of 14 year old girl. His original ex-wife accused him of domestic abuse in court papers. According to the reasoning the commenter uses, this can only mean one thing.

    If those accusations are correct, the actions are inexcusable. However, as you said a few days ago accusations are not statements of facts or proof. It is amazing how you are willing to ignore your own arguments. Just more hypocrisy from you, I guess.

    And in case you missed it, the husband of your queen was guilty of sexual harassment while in the White House as well as other instances. Funny how you and the left stood behind his wrongful actions. Once again, more hypocrisy from you because of your lack of morals and ethics.

    We understand why you mud wrestlers are unwilling to discuss issues

    Talking to yourself again, Jeffery?

    Have you told your wife that you consider her delusional and weak minded? Wouldn’t such comments construe abuse?

    Religious bigotry is anti-America regardless of your claims of heroism.

    This point you tried to make was addressed earlier in this thread.

    However, as famously stated in Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, “the Constitution is not a suicide pact.”

    That is to say that those who seek to destroy the country and the natural / God given freedoms of its citizens need not sit idly by while that destruction takes place. It can be argued that those who do not believe in the Constitution and seek to destroy it should not be granted it’s protections. That’s a far reaching notion and one that I am not willing to go down.

    However, despite your simple citation of the First Amendment, it is not absolute. The government has the right and the ability to restrict speech and religion when there is a compelling governmental interest.

    It is impossible to argue that protecting peaceful citizens who are subject to attacks based on the religious beliefs of a sect is not a compelling government interest.

    Does that mean that we should deport or make the life of all Muslims difficult? No. Not at all. But the US should restrict the actions and rhetoric that directly threaten people and the safety of the nation based on their religious beliefs.

    But since that destroyed your point, you ignored it as you always do with you are being a hypocritical troll.

    What was it you said? Oh yeah….

    We understand why you mud wrestlers are unwilling to discuss issues ….

    Hoisted on your own leftist, wife abusing petard Jeffery.

Bad Behavior has blocked 7435 access attempts in the last 7 days.