Hannity Loses It Yet Again

Did anyone ever conceive of Sean Hannity going as fruit loops as Excitable Andrew Sullivan, Markos Molitos (Daily Kos), and Charles Johnson (Little Green Footballs)?

(Mediaite)  The conservative host first stated that we had only 13 days left until we made the decision to “keep screwing the country up” or “try and fix it.”

Letting his audience know that he was angry, he noted that there was going to be a reckoning with the Never Trump crowd the day after the election.

“All this garbage from you Never Trumper jerks out there,” Hannity shouted. “I’ve had it. By the way, that’s more unfinished business. November 9th, I have a lot to say about all of you.”

He’s had it! Nice threat at the last, though, eh? Of course, since he’s lost quite a bit of audience due to this barking moonbat behavior, we won’t actually hear it.

At one point, Hannity apparently had the dump button hit on him after he said Donald Trump isn’t “freaking perfect.” Following up the delay, he yelled, “I’m pissed!”

The problem with people like Hannity, besides utterly abandoning their principles to pimp Trump in the same way Lefties pimped Obama (I don’t remember Hannity being this passionate (loopy) over McCain nor Romney), is that they have decided that they’ll get more done with vinegar then honey. Instead of trying to convince people that Trump isn’t as bad as #NeverTrump thinks they’ve simply decided that insults and abuse are the way forward. This same abuse tends to negatively effect those who are on the fence of deciding whether they will put a gasmask on and check the box for Trump as a protest vote against Hillary or simply just not vote for president.

As for those Republicans voting for Hillary, well, you’ve gone beyond abandoning everything you hold dear. I have zero respect for those who would endorse her, instead of saying “I can’t vote for either.”

Anyhow, what’s the difference between Hillary insulting over 6 million Americans as “deplorables” and Hannity calling the millions who refuse to vote Trump names?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

7 Responses to “Hannity Loses It Yet Again”

  1. john says:

    well Teach I have zero respect for those who endorse Trump, instead of saying “I can’t vote for either one”
    Of course living in a deep blue state means that Hillary will win anyway.
    Of course NC is different Clinton will probably win it, but, will you vote for Putin’s boy ?

  2. david7134 says:

    The difference is that Hillary is a public official and at least has to act like she cares about everyone, Hannity can and should shame everyone who is stupid enough to vote for Hillary or not support her opponent. Hillary should be in prison and the fact that she is a candidate (losing) for president is beyond ridiculous and shows how low our country has come.

  3. Jeffery says:

    dave,

    Hillary will almost certainly win. There’s a chance that Dems will win the Senate.

    What will you do then? Will you grab a gun like Joe Walsh?

  4. tim says:

    “(W)hat’s the difference between Hillary insulting…and Hannity calling (NeverTrumpers) names?”

    Two things, context and source.

    First source.

    If a crack ho called me deplorable I’d probably laugh and carry on with my live immediately forgetting what just happened.

    If a friend called me a jerk I’d probably pause and reflect that maybe I’m guilty of such.

    Next context.

    If someone who has swindled, cheated, lied and otherwise grafted their way to financial benefit calls you untrustworthy based upon nothing more than you knowing/liking another person, how would you take it? Would it be an insult or merely BS coming from a Douchebag?

    If someone you respect is upset because you’re not doing something they believe will cause harm to not only yourself, others, and the country, how would take it? Would it cause you to pause or…just shrug it off?

    Context and source.

  5. david7134 says:

    Jeff,
    No sense in discussing anything with you. I don’t respect you or your opinion. You are not well educated and I seriously doubt any of your claimed distinctions. You derive pleasure from trying to make others feel bad or calling them names. In many ways I feel sorry for you. I could not understand your support of Hillary as she is the antithesis of what you claim is good, but then I realized that it draws you much needed attention and confirms in your mind that you are superior to others and not their equal. Truly a very pathetic individual.

  6. Liam Thomas says:

    Podesta relative earned six-figure fees lobbying Clinton’s State Dept. during his tenure there

    The FBI agent investigating HRC during the email scandal…his wife was given 800k by the Clinton mafia…..gee I wonder why that was…..

    But not to worry…she was found not guilty…no charges filed EVEN THOUGH THEY GAVE 5 people immunity because after all Clinton did nothing wrong…..

  7. o0Nighthawk0o says:

    EVEN THOUGH THEY GAVE 5 people immunity because after all Clinton did nothing wrong…..

    And they plead the 5th on every question asked. They had immunity already, so who were they really protecting? It certainly wasn’t themselves.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9468 access attempts in the last 7 days.