Half Of Voters Think Hillary’s Use Of Private Server Was Illegal

This could be a wee bit of a problem for Entitled Hillary, and you can bet the ranch that the Trump campaign has seen, or will shortly see, this poll, using it as an added attack line against Hillary. Whatever you say about the guy, he will not only fire a salvo, but, he will keep firing and firing and firing.

(The Hill) Half of all voters think that Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server during her time as secretary of State was illegal, according to a new Morning Consult poll released Wednesday.

Meanwhile, 27 percent say they’re not sure if it was legal or not, and 22 percent believe it was legal. And 20 percent said the practice was ethical.

Nearly half of voters polled, 48 percent, see her use of a private server as a major problem for the campaign, while 24 percent see it as a minor one. Eighteen percent said it isn’t a problem at all.

Neither The Hill article nor the Morning Consult article break it down fully by party affiliation, race, sex, etc for the 2,001 registered voters surveyed. One must have a subscription to see the raw data. Regardless, this is a devastating poll for Hillary. With 50% saying it’s illegal, and the ability to sway another 27%, and you know that a goodly chunk of that 27% will have a low opinion if they aren’t quite sure, this could become a major issue and headache as pushed by Trump and Republicans as the general election approaches. Some pundits are very concerned with down ticket elections due to Trump. Well, Democrats should also be concerned for the down ticket elections, as they are linked with a corrupt and law-breaking presidential candidate.

There is a slight breakdown by party, per the Morning Consult article

But even among Democrats, a quarter of them think it is a major problem for Clinton, compared with 50 percent of self-identified independents and 78 percent of Republicans.

That will leave a mark. So will this

Only 20 percent of voters believed her practice was ethical.

In other words, 80% believe she acted in an unethical manner. Best case for Hillary is that the FBI comes out and says she broke no laws. At that point, though, we might as well understand that laws for you and me do not apply to Big Wigs.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

27 Responses to “Half Of Voters Think Hillary’s Use Of Private Server Was Illegal”

  1. drowningpuppies says:

    Even after a year and a half PolitiFact admits that Hilldog is a dirty little lying whore.

  2. drowningpuppies says:

    Hillary Clinton did not choose to go full Costanza from the outset.

    “Was that wrong? Should I have not done that? I tell you, I gotta plead ignorance on this thing, because if anyone had said anything to me at all when I first started here, that that sort of thing was frowned upon, you know, ’cause I’ve worked in a lot of offices, and I tell you, people do that all the time.”



  3. JGlanton says:

    LOL @ Hillary going full-Costanza.

    Trump must be going Opposite Costanza. Whatever instincts a politician would have, Trump does the opposite. Like George in the Opposite episode:

  4. alanstorm says:

    “Half Of Voters Think Hillary’s Use Of Private Server Was Illegal”

    And the other half were liberals, AKA dumb as stumps.

  5. Jeffery says:

    Melania Trump. Now there’s a nasty, dirty little whore, don’t you agree?

  6. drowningpuppies says:

    What criminal investigation??

  7. Jeffery says:

    What criminal investigation?

  8. Hank_M says:

    Going after Trumps wife, Jeffery?
    To what purpose?
    Do you really have to sink that low?

  9. Jeffery says:


    Comment by drowningpuppies

    2016-06-01 11:00:53

    Even after a year and a half PolitiFact admits that Hilldog is a dirty little lying whore.

    I thought all was fair. Do you disagree? Trump called Clinton’s spouse a racist. The third Mrs. Trump, Melania, is campaigning too.

    If you believe it inappropriate to be calling female candidates, spouses and surrogates “dirty lying little whores”; why did you wait until now to speak up?

  10. drowningpuppies says:

    What criminal investigation?

  11. Hank_M says:

    Candidates are fair game for insults, as are former politicians.
    However I personally draw the line at insulting the families of politicians.
    You don’t. I’m not surprised.

  12. Jeffery says:


    How convenient. LOL. You guys are precious. And of course you miss the point. Is it ever proper to call a woman, candidate or not, a “whore”? That’s what your comrade dp did. It’s good to know you have some limits, partisan as they are.

    Is it OK to refer to Donnie Trump as a fat, lying bisexual whore? He was banging other women while married. Some have said he enjoys servicing and getting serviced by boys.

    Third wife and former mistress, Melania Trump is clearly campaigning for her despicable husband. Does that make her off limits? You may be right, she is probably more properly referred to as a “slut”. Didn’t she previously make money off her naked body?

    Is it OK to refer to Hillary Clinton as a lying little whore? If so, would you agree that Teabaggin’ Sarah Palin was and is a nasty, skanky whore and the Carly Fiorina was a smelly lying whore? Sarah had a one night stand with college B-ball player, who was Black! What a nasty whore!

    Sorry Hankie, but you don’t get to make the rules.

    Melania is a surrogate for her despicable husband’s campaign. The other side is referring to his opponent, a woman, as a lying little whore. Sorry Hankie, but the lying whore Melania is fair game as long as the other side is playing nasty.

    The problem with the far right is their lack of character. You call women you don’t like whores and sluts, then whine as little victim babies when you get it back. You don’t reason with sharks, you hit back. If you wish to be treated decently, you must treat others decently. Trump is not decent. It’s only a matter of time before he refers to Secretary Clinton as a lying cunt. His base will love it as a sign of his manly courage, but it will not help him overcome the demographics of his coming loss. But then he’s not looking to win, he’s looking for attention and money.

  13. Hank_M says:

    jeff, you are pathetic. You refer to a whole series of women as whores and worse and then accuse others of a lack of character.

    Stay in the gutter jeff. It’s where you belong.

  14. drowningpuppies says:

    What criminal investigation?

  15. david7134 says:

    Jeff is not dealing with a full deck. It is obvious that he has a screw loose. Note, he has been given government money his whole life and admittedly lives off the government tit. When called on his free money, he starts rants about how others get paid for actual work that they do and for which they bill the government. Making it seem that he actually gives back for the millions that the taxpayers give him for education and his great business. By the way, he does nothing to cure cancer or actually develop drugs and deliver them. His corporations takes drugs from the developers, who have done the lions share of the work and development. Then he organizes what are call Phase II trials for the drugs. This basically is paying off the FDA, the various doctors (that is why he likes foreign doctors as those are the main ones he contacts and are utterly corrupt). Then he runs supposedly double blind trials of the drugs. This is a joke as all active drugs have some effect on the body that can easily be picked up by even a medical student. He runs an inactive drug against these and desires positive reviews for his drugs from the “neutral” (but foreign) doctors. Basically our man Jeff is as crooked as Hillary, that is why he can’ see her for what she is.

  16. Hank_M says:

    That explains a lot David. Especially his economic idiocy.

  17. david7134 says:

    I didn’t even get into the stats. When you deal with these companies, they really manipulate stats. Jeff says that his are “clean”. That does not mean a thing. There are types of stats that make no sense, but doctors are afraid to challenge them as they will appear stupid. These companies will disguise everything by numbers. If you look at Jeffs comments, it is evident that he is fast and loose with this concept. For instance, I have made an issue about cholesterol. Statins are a major drug used to treat this, yet if you look up the Jupiter Trial you will find that they are questionable. What happens is that statins will relieve the inflammation that is associated with CV disease, but they only reduce the incidence of MI by 3% per year. Yes, all that money and effort and putting up with the bad effects of statins and that is all they do. What Jeff and his buds do is to extrapolate that to 10 years and claim a 30% reduction in CV disease (multiply # times 10 is what they do). This is obviously crap. Yet they have the whole medical industry snowed. Note how Jeff argues and you see that he is good at this concept.

  18. Jeffery says:


    As has been proven repeatedly, you’re a lying little whore.

  19. Jeffery says:


    You can’t be that stupid.

  20. Jeffery says:

    dave n’ hank,

    Just explain to dp that it’s not proper to call Secretary Clinton a whore, and this will all go away. Otherwise, you’re both just nasty lying little hypocritical whores yourselves.

    Just criticize one of your tribe for his vile comments. That’s all that’s needed.

    Is it wrong to call Secretary Clinton a lying little whore? It’s a simple question.

    Is it wrong to call Secretary Clinton a lying little whore? If you can’t even answer that simple question you should go back to your mutual masturbation.

  21. Jeffery says:

    and dave,

    I don’t know who you’re stalking online, but you’ve got the wrong person and company.

    Did you ever report me to the FDA you KKK Kleagle, you?

  22. Hank_M says:

    “Just explain to dp that it’s not proper to call Secretary Clinton a whore”

    Aww. did dp hurt your feelings?

    Maybe he learned the term from your “tribe”.
    Remember when South Carolina Democrat and 2014 gubernatorial candidate Vincent Sheheen called Republican Governor Nikki Haley a “whore”?
    Or the time Alan Grayson hurled the insult at Linda Robertson on the Alex Jones Show?
    or Jerry Brown calling Republican rival Meg Whitman a “whore”?

    Can’t speak for dp but he does seem to keep up with events pretty well. Maybe he learned the term from your “tribe”.

  23. david7134 says:

    Clinton is not a whore, she has not had sex with a man since the birth of her daughter, she has an on going relationship with a woman in Longview, TX (fact). She is wholly corrupt and has been selling influence in her job at State.

    Another thing about Jeff. He is what is called a grant writer. That is a strange job, most people that I know in it are very frustrated and mad at the world. They are hired to specifically write request for government money. In Jeff’s case that is the NIH. He knows the language and form to use to get the bureaucrats to let go of our tax money. So, as a result, his education was paid for by us, and his corrupt corporation is paid for with our money. As I have said before, his corporation will pay doctors about 20 to 30,000 dollars for each patient enrolled into their study. Although with cancer it might be up to $50,000. The doctor will generally hire one nurse to help with the paper work. He then pockets the rest, minus maybe some lab charges, although this is negotiable. From this obvious pay off, he expects the foreign doctor to give an unbiased report. Other perks go into this. Jeff and group will generally write a big article on the trial and the doctor can put his name on the document. A big plus for academic doctors. If the doctors don’t play ball, then they will be excluded from future trials. Note the pressure to do what Jeff desires.

  24. Jeffery says:


    You’re just a lying little whore.

  25. Jeffery says:


    Of course my feelings aren’t hurt. But you seem hurt that I called Melania Trump a whore. Why?

    If true, the cases where Dems called female opponents “whores” is reprehensible and they should all be roundly criticized and voted out. Sheheen apologized and lost twice by landslides to Gov Haley. Grayson apologized and is out. Brown didn’t call Whitman a “whore” but apologized for his staff.

    No one should be calling others whores. OK? But if you’re going to do it, so will we. Get it?

  26. drowningpuppies says:

    No one should be calling others whores. OK?

    Get over yourself you little whoremonger.

Pirate's Cove