Piers Morgan: Say, Shouldn’t We Listen To Donald Trump On Muslim Terrorism?

Well, this was unexpected, as Piers Morgan publishs an opinion piece in the UK Daily Mail

When it comes to terror, isn’t it time we started listening seriously to Trump?

How many more?

That’s all I could think this morning as news broke of yet another ISIS terror attack, this time in Brussels.

How many more innocent men, women and children are going to be blown to pieces by these murderous bastards?

How many more airports, train stations, sports stadiums, restaurants or concert halls will be obliterated in a hail of suicide bombs and bullets?

How many more world leaders will wring their hands on national television afterwards and spout pointless platitudes about the ‘poor brave victims’ and ‘heroic emergency services’?

How many taunting, gleeful claims of responsibility will the despicable perpetrators of these evil crimes be able to issue?

I’m sick of this, aren’t you?

Sick of feeling sick about such endless, senseless barbarism.

And the worst thing about it is that I see no end.

He’s entirely correct. I wonder if Piers Morgan realizes that a great solution to this is to stop attempting to take away guns from citizens, guns which can be used to protect themselves from the murderous Islamist bastards. Piers Morgan has been, of course, a big proponent of gun control and confiscation.

Morgan goes on to slam Obama, German leader Angela Merkel, Belgium, and others for their lax policies, uncaring positions, and inability to stand against all the Islamists coming into Europe via the “refugees”. Morgan notes that he actually had a long ago scheduled interview set up with Donald Trump for yesterday, and goes on to write

Here is one man who definitely has a plan to deal with ISIS terrorism. Several plans in fact.

The problem is that people don’t like them. Well, a lot of people don’t anyway.

Trump, current front-runner for the Republican nomination, wants to hit ISIS ‘so hard they never recover’.

(As he told me: ‘You’ve got to take them out and you’ve got to take them out harshly and you’ve got to take them out fast.’)

He also wants a short-term ban on Muslims entering the U.S. until, as he puts it, ‘we figure out what the hell is going on?’

And he wants to torture suspects like Abdeslam with techniques like water-boarding to try and extract information about future attacks.

Oh, and he wants to build a giant wall to stop illegal immigrants pouring over the Mexican border into America.

You’ll have to hit the link to read the rest, in terms of Morgan’s agreement with Trump. There’s only so much excerpting that is really “fair use”, but, Morgan notes on so many issues surrounding illegal immigration and Islamic terrorism “Is he wrong?”, in regards to Trump. No, Trump is not wrong. What’s made many upset with Trump is that he is not couching his comments in political correctness nor Political Speak. This plain speaking from Trump is one of the reasons so many are following and voting for Trump. Why they are passionate (sometimes entirely too passionate). The Islamists are in a war with the non-Islamist world, especially the West.

It’s not just the violence, as I’ve explained in the past. It’s the non-violent ones, as well. Those, as guided by the tenets of the Muslim Brotherhood, who use our laws, our Constitutions and founding documents, our courts, our social mores, our beliefs, against us. They take the Leftist belies about tolerance, diversity, and multiculturalism and turn them around, deeming that any condemnation of the Islamists, whether the violent or non-violent ones, is Islamophobia and WrongThink. They slowly push Sharia law, treating women as 2nd class citizens, banning certain speech, heck, even banning pork in governmental buildings, and so much more, all designed to push Western nations towards their Islamist ways. They infiltrate and change Western nations. Their playbook is similar to the hardcore Leftist playbook, and are in direct competition with Leftists, yet, Leftists foolishly defend the Islamists, who stand against everything the Islamists are for.

On Islamists and illegals, Trump is correct. I still do not want him as president, but, we should listen to him.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

8 Responses to “Piers Morgan: Say, Shouldn’t We Listen To Donald Trump On Muslim Terrorism?”

  1. Jeffery says:

    With great fear comes counterproductive solutions.

    After 9/11 there was a surge of “liberals” who became “conservatives” out of fear of terrorists.

  2. david7134 says:

    Yes, we should double down on the TSA searching old women and children of non-Muslim origin. That makes all the sense in the world. We need to PROFILE and limit Muslim activity until they get their house in order.

    Many sight the treatment of the Japs in WWII as an example of over-reach and anger reaction. Well, first, the Japs, Italians and Germans were interned and watched. Then, what they don’t tell you is that Jap pilots shot down during Pearl Harbor were cared for by Japanese Americans before the authorities found them. Then, about 30% of Japanese interned caused substantial problems and attacked the US interest in their area sighting their loyalty to Japan. So, the internment was necessary.

  3. Bob says:

    “Trump is correct. I still do not want him as president, but, we should listen to him.”

    Then who? Name someone in this race we can actually want to vote for.

    I have no idea.

  4. david7134 says:

    We can vote for Hillary and watch as the country is destroyed and we have nothing else to worry about.

  5. With great fear comes counterproductive solutions.

    Hilarious, coming from a guy whose compatriots have histrionics when they see a confederate flag, a Poptart bitten into the shape of a gun, a water pistol, “Trump 2016” written in chalk (see today’s If All you See for the link), people clapping, words they do not like, and the list goes on and on. Liberals crap their pants in fear over these things.

  6. Dana says:

    There are very few Muslims who are actually terrorists, but the problem is that the larger Muslim communities enable the terrorists. Whatshisname who was recently arrested in Brussels in connection to the Paris bombings had been hiding from an intensive manhunt in his own neighborhood. He was able to do this because his friends and neighbors helped to conceal him, providing him with food and shelter, and the rest of the community simply ignored his presence. Osama bin Laden was able to hide out for years because the neighbors kept their mouths shut.

    We are slightly more willing to admit this problem when it comes the the black community in our major cities adhering to the “stop snitchin'” notion, enabling the thugs and gang-bangers to hide in plain sight, and not have witnesses come forward to testify and get the killers locked up. We are very unwilling to admit what the Israelis already know about Gaza, that the Palestinian community enable Hamas. That’s why the Israelis take the regrettably only half-measure of destroying the terrorists’ homes, to punish their families and send the message to the rest of the community that enabling the terrorists leads to their own poverty. (The Israelis should simply round up all of the Palestinians and shove them into Jordan and Egypt, but the Jordanians and Egyptians don’t want them either: the Palestinians are regarded as the trash of the Middle East by their brother Arabs.)

    If the Europeans allow the existence of the Muslim immigrant ghettos, they are allowing the existence of terrorism.

  7. Jeffery says:

    Teach: Don’t get your lace panties in a twist.

    Liberals do not fear the Confederate flag, they just recognize that as a symbol of America’s darkest days, it should not be supported by our governments.

  8. Dana says:

    Jeffrey wrote:

    Teach: Don’t get your lace panties in a twist.

    Now, how can this be!?! Here we have an oh-so-inclusive leftist trying to insult our host by implying that he is a homosexual or a crossdresser or otherwise effeminate in some way. Why, some people might even think that was hypocrisy or something!

Pirate's Cove