Now, I know the Warmists out there will start attacking the messenger, but, that’s pretty much because they can’t attack the science and hard facts. Steven Goddard points to the Fox News story making the rounds about Climate Realists questioning the report about 2012 being the hottest contiguous US year ever (which only proves that the year was very warm, but does provide causation)
(Real Science) Nothing could be further from the truth. As of 1999, NASA showed that 1934 was more than one degree (Fahrenheit) warmer than 1998, and that 1921, 1931 and 1953 were all warmer than 1998. (snip)
NOAA makes bold press releases based on hugely altered data, and makes no mention that the data is altered. Then when called out, they claim that the adjustments are small, when in fact the adjustments are larger than the trend. The 1930s used to be by far the hottest decade, before the data was adjusted.
Head on over to view the graphs. Which are science. And facts.
Is this part of that giant conspiracy that truthers believe in? 9/11, the Holocaust, evolution, young Earth, the plot to seize all the guns, the New world Order, all of the people who hold onto these beliefs can point to some bits of “evidence” to support their conspiracy theories. And the melting of the Arctic ice cap?? probably some would somehow blame SOROS for that
Only john could take the falsifying of data and try to dismiss it as a “conspiracy” from those with the actual data.
Sorry john, but if you have to manufacture data to fit the theory, it is you that are the conspiracy theorist, not the people armed with facts.