Obama Reinforces Stance On Unconstitutional Contraceptive Mandate

It boggles the mind why Obama would want to pick this fight with Catholics, which also means Conservatives, Tea Party members, Republicans, and the 60+% of Americans who oppose ObamaCare get riled up again, in an election year. Democrats, including Obama, avoided mentioning ObamaCare during the 2010 mid-term elections in the same manner people avoid discussions of their grandparents having sex. They avoided mentioning it during 2011. Obama avoided it during the 2011 and 2012 State of the Union campaign speeches. Why bring it up now?

But, Obama is not giving up on forcing his views on American’s, reducing their freedom (via Hot Air)

(ABC News) President Obama “reinforced” his stance on the controversial contraception mandate while speaking at the Democrats’ annual retreat at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. today, Senate Democrats said.

The retreat was closed to media.

Following President Obama’s speech at the retreat, a small group of Senate Democrats, mostly women, left the retreat early in order to hold a news conference on Capitol Hill to counter the Republicans’ news conference today at which they called for the mandate to be overturned.

Democrats said they will “fight strongly” to keep the mandate in place.

“It is our clear understanding from the administration that the president believes as we do, and the vast majority of the American women should have access to birth control,” Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said pointing out that 15 percent of women use birth control for medical issues. “It’s medicine, and women deserve their medicine.”

Yet, they do have access to contraception, regardless of whether their health insurance offers it or not.  They can get a prescription from a doctor and pick up birth control pills. No one is stopping them. They can go down to the local pharmacy and buy condoms! Amazing, eh? And easy! They’re even available at grocery stores and small places like 7/11, WaWa, Kangaroo, and so on. By this same argument the Democrats are making, every plan should include, say, laser eye surgery. For free. No co-pays. Yet, most don’t even include a small discount. Government is not mandating. But, 1 in 4 American’s will need some sort of corrective eye implements by age 40.

“The power to decide whether or not to use contraception lies with a woman – not her boss,” said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y. “What is more intrusive than trying to allow an employer to make medical decisions for someone who works for them?”

As Allahpundit wrote Anyone want to field that question from ObamaCare supporter Kirsten Gillibrand? What about the Central Government’s power to decide? But, neither is deciding whether or not to use contraception, they are deciding whether it is in the health insurance plans. Government is mandating over the specific religious objections of Catholics, a clear violation of the 1st Amendment, along with the liberals own talking points about a “separation of Church and State.”

This is not a bug, though, nor a by-product. This is intentional. When you dig into ObamaCare, you see that one of the main points is to make sure private sector employers who offer health insurance drop their coverages. Central government would much rather have the private sector pay the $2,000 fine to the Central Government, rather than pay the $6-12 thousand per year per employee they are paying now, with the employees then joining the government health insurance exchange. With each company that ends up dropping their offers, the Democrats can demonize them and says “look how mean private sector companies are!”

If just one employee obtains insurance through the exchange, their company is responsible for paying the fine for every employee. In retail, there can be, roughly, 25% of the employees being part-time. Some companies offer insurance for them, but, none take it, because it is much more expensive. Some do not even offer to part time. Companies will not take the chance that just one obtains insurance through the exchange. They will drop their plans. And that’s beside the notion that the fine is cheaper than the out-lays.

Let’s not forget this from the other day

Unless this rule is overturned, we Catholics will be compelled to either violate our consciences or drop health care coverage for our employees (and suffer the penalties for doing so),” according to a letter from Archbishop Joseph Naumann of the Archdiocese of Kansas City in Kansas.

“Drop health care coverage.” That’s the point. But, why Obama would want to pick this fight in a presidential election year is strange. Perhaps he thinks that no matter how shabbily he treats Catholics, they’ll still vote for him. Democrats treat lots of voter blocks poorly, and, yes, they are dumb enough to vote Democrats. Will this time be different? Perhaps Obama was trying to change the narrative, which is that he is incompetent, has no clue how to deal with the economy, and is against creating private sector jobs. Move the conversation away from Keystone XL, Solyndra and other failed “green” companies, the waste of Stimulus, and Fast and Furious. Or, perhaps, he just doesn’t know better, and made a whopper of a mistake in green lighting this agenda.

More: The Lonely Conservative: To hear them talk you’d think Republicans are trying to outlaw birth control. Kirsten Gillibrand even said a woman’s boss shouldn’t be the one to decide whether she uses birth control. This isn’t about choosing to use contraception, it’s about who pays for it, and the government has no business forcing people to pay for it when it violates their beliefs.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Obama Reinforces Stance On Unconstitutional Contraceptive Mandate”

  1. Dana says:

    Our esteemed President will back off of this regulation, as he always intended to do, until after the election; that’s why they scheduled the one year delay for implementation until August of 2013 in the first place. He will wind up reining in the liberals, showing us all how moderate he is, until he is safely re-elected. Then, watch out! The regulation will be imposed, stringently.

  2. Word says:

    You actually want to have this fight early. Not later.

    Fighting it now means it will be played out and passions will be cooled by general election time.

    This is what happened with the Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers thing. It played out in the primaries and come election time……it was no longer much of an issue.

    Obama camp are not idiots. They are a lot like the Bush/Rove team…..they understand politics. Obama himself might not but his puppeteers do in deed understand what they are doing.

  3. Dana says:

    Of course, there’s also the other interesting notion, that I would guess is still in the back of their minds. ObaminableCare is before the Supreme Court now, and this proposed regulation could help persuade the five conservative, Catholic justices to toss the whole thing. Then they mobilize the liberal base by saying, “OK, we tried a universal health care plan utilizing the private insurers, and it didn’t work; all that’s left is to go to a single-payer plan.”

  4. Word says:

    Perhaps he thinks that no matter how shabbily he treats Catholics, they’ll still vote for him.

    They do the same thing to the Jewish people as well. For whatever reason the Jews seem to vote Democratic when it is the right and conservatives who are their biggest supporters.

    I surmise the thinking is that the Jews and Catholics believe they have nothing to gain by being in the conservative/right/GOP fold and so they remain in the Democratic fold in order to persuade the party to not infringe upon their interests.

    Politics is about interests. Always has been and the Democrats know this….its why they can continue to trample upon their base and know…..just know that the base will never abandon them to vote for the other guys.

  5. […] has no business forcing people to pay for it when it violates their beliefs.Update: Linked by the Pirate’s Cove – thanks!google_ad_client = "ca-pub-1395656889568144"; /* 300×250, created 8/11/08 */ […]

  6. david7134 says:

    It isn’t just the Catholics that are upset with this mandate. Some of my friends don’t have a religious preference yet are po’ed.

    But always remember, a number of Jews and other religious folks voted for Hitler.

  7. mojo says:

    I think “suffer(ing) the penalties” constitutes martyrdom, doesn’t it?

  8. PatriotUSA says:

    Fuck obama and the far left progressives that wipe his ass and pander to moochelle and her numerous crusades.

    Sick of this bastard and his crap.

    November cannot get here soon enough for so many of us>

    Fuck obama!

  9. […] forcing the choice of whether to use contraception on someone. Our friend William Teach over at the Pirate’s Cove notes one of the arguments and its failure. “The power to decide whether or not to use […]

Bad Behavior has blocked 8695 access attempts in the last 7 days.