Bummer: “Climate Change” Bad For Santa Or Something

Continuing the 25 Days Of Climate Christmas

Tough sledding ahead for Santa

This Christmas is turning out to be a potentially bad season for Santa Claus.

The North Pole is melting and as it shrinks there’s the danger that it will reveal the location of the secret workshop where Santa and the elves spend most of the year making toys, cleverly disguising their origin by labeling them “Made in China.”

Moreover, as the ice melts, nations are beginning to lay claim to segments of the Pole in the belief that under the ice cap there are oil, gas and mineral deposits in addition to a super-efficient toy factory.

And then writer Dale McFeatters makes fun of Santa’s out of season and PETA enraging clothing. Fortunately, if this winter becomes the 5th out of the last 6 to be heavy…

Scientist: Heavier Snow Just One Climate Change Impact in Ohio

From heavier snowfall and rainfall to record-setting summer temperatures, many experts say climate change is happening in Ohio.

That’s how you know it’s a cult. No Warmist can tell you what conditions would disprove anthropogenic “climate change”, and no matter what happens, climate change is to blame.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

RSS feed

You can login to comment with:

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

10 Comments

Comment by Jeffery
2013-12-14 09:29:05

The Pirate typed: “That’s how you know it’s a cult. No Warmist can tell you what conditions would disprove anthropogenic “climate change”, and no matter what happens, climate change is to blame.”

Cultists, and warmists and hypocrites, oh my. You know full well what it takes to disprove anthropogenic climate change – demonstrate that the Earth is not warming, demonstrate that CO2 is not increasing, demonstrate that CO2 isn’t causing the Earth to retain more of the sun’s heat…your claim that the theory is not falsifiable is false.

Present the solid evidence that is not consistent with the theory. That the climate has changed before is not evidence. That it snows in winter is not sufficient.

 
Comment by Jl
2013-12-14 10:39:42

“You know what it takes to disprove AGW.” Actually, no, because we don’t have to prove a negative. It’s you who has to prove it, but you haven’t. “Demonstrate that CO2 isn’t increasing.” Jeffery, is your memory going on you? As said before, no one is saying CO2 isn’t increasing- please follow along. But that’s the point- there’s no correlation between CO2 and heat. But your un-scientific method of “debating” is pretty funny- start with a conclusion and work backward. A theory is supposed to conform to the evidence rather than attempting to conform evidence to a theory.

 
Comment by William Teach
2013-12-14 11:41:28

Present the solid evidence that is not consistent with the theory.

We have have, time and time again. But there is no evidence that you Warmists will accept, and you’ve set up your hypothesis to be impossible to disprove. No matter what occurs, you say it proves anthropogenic “climate change”. It’s a cult, not science.

 
Comment by Veritas
2013-12-14 13:41:27

In the 70s they warned of an ice age. Then the ozone hole. Most scientists warn against this cult. I wish just one of these cultists would put their money where their mouth is. But they sit on them most of the time.

 
Comment by Jeffery
2013-12-15 07:57:22

Pirate -
Bummer. The sum total of your “evidence” is: 1. It snowed today in Cairo or something. 2. Climate scientists drive to work and fly to conferences or something. 3. Jeffery uses an electric clothes dryer or something. Perhaps the Nobel Committee lost your telephone number or something.

jl –
Bummer. It’s a scientific theory, not a hypothesis or something. Because of the overwhelming evidence and propensity of data, the burden of proof has shifted! God is a hypothesis, since there is no evidence. Just as you would now have to disprove the cell theory, the theory of gravity, the theory of relativity, and evolution, you now have to disprove or refute this theory, otherwise you’ll be labeled a crank, or a denier or something. All you have to do is explain why the Earth has been rapidly warming for the past century. Or something.

This is like discovering a lost tribe in Borneo that believes a sky god puts a blanket over the Earth every night. Or something.

 
Comment by gitarcarver
2013-12-15 11:19:51

Jiffy:

And the sum of your rebuttal is “If I ignore the evidence you put forth, I can claim it doesn’t exist.”

No wonder you say there is not a God….. you believe you are one.

 
Comment by jl
2013-12-15 20:33:17

J-”All you have to do is explain why the earth has been rapidly warming this past century.” What’s “rapidly”? And you’d have a point if you somehow knew how centuries in the past warmed or cooled. Which you of course don’t, so there’s no way of knowing if this is out of the ordinary- mainly because we don’t know what “ordinary” is. So Jeffery, there’ve been at least 40 million centuries that have gone by since the beginning of the earth. Let me know when you can prove none of those warmed faster than this last century. It should be easy, right, because you have all the “data”. We’re waiting. “The burden of proof has shifted!” No, it has not! Nice try.

 
Comment by Done With Winter Gumballs Subscribed to comments via email
2013-12-15 21:15:56

As J only points out heat waves, tornados, droughts, and fires as proof of his cult’s belief system, then he can’t complain when the other side does the same thing.

but he does? hmmmm.. telling.

Wonder if the fact that santa flies through the air kinds proves this fallacy? Or, that he is supposedly a magical creature with magical elves and reindeer? So much fail here. THe fact that he is not bound by our physics means anything???

 
Comment by Jeffery
2013-12-15 22:40:36

gitty up,

If you weren’t so belligerent I’d pity you. Ignorance and dickishness are a bad combo.

Your dwindling side presents no evidence.

I didn’t say there are no gods, only that there is no evidence of gods. There may be gods, but it seems unlikely to me. I do not understand how supposedly rational people think that magic is real.

 
Comment by gitarcarver
2013-12-15 23:08:00

Your dwindling side presents no evidence.

Not only do we keep presenting evidence, we show the fallacies in your so called “evidence.” But like most members of a cult, you refuse to see the evidence and engage in any rational debate.

I didn’t say there are no gods, only that there is no evidence of gods.

Once again, what you mean is “there is no evidence that you are willing to accept.” That is not the same thing as no evidence.

I do not understand how supposedly rational people think that magic is real.

When you start with the false premise that God is “magic,” there is nothing that can convince you (at least in this life.)

In the end, your arguments are lacking in logic and thought.

But that is why you are a liberal as most liberals hate facts and logic.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9379 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE