Marc Morano Destroys Warmist Bill Nye

Lots of good links to the lively debate beatdown over at Climate Depot. Let’s start with this one from Tom Nelson, who points out that Bill Nye the Science guy exposed the Warmist agenda with 6 words

MORANO: Why is it the wrong argument? Because every proposal ever done including the United Nations Kyoto protocol would not impact the temperatures assuming you buy into their science.

NYE [shaking his head, at the 7:15 mark]: We’re not talking about the temperature.

And boom, there it is, the notion that “climate change” is about something other than actual warming.

Newsbusters has the transcript.

And here’s NoTricksZone

It started as soon as Nye opened his mouth at the 1:39 mark, he claimed the Medieval Warm Period and Roman Period were isolated incidents occurring only in Europe. He repeated it again at 2:55.

That claim was already refuted 10 years ago. Since then there have been dozens of studies from every corner of the globe where proxy data clearly show that the aforementioned optimums occurred in cycles WORLDWIDE. Incredibly, Bill Nye thinks that the global temperature was more or less constant before human CO2 emissions. Even Michael Mann no longer believes that.

And another good zinger from Morano

Morano: ‘CO2 is rising. No one’s disputing that. What Bill Nye just did was waste everyone’s time explaining that CO2 is rising. The question is what impact does CO2 have on the weather, what impact does CO2 have on climate change,’ exclaimed the publisher of climatedepot.com’

Soros funded Media Matters is upset that CNN dared to provide Morano with a debate platform….probably because Climate Realists always destroy Warmists when they actually debate.

Video below the fold

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

RSS feed

You can login to comment with:

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

7 Comments

Comment by john
2012-12-06 13:10:28

Coldists are now claiming that the Arctic Sea Ice is disappearing becuse it is being used in frozen margarittas

 
Comment by Gumball_Brains Subscribed to comments via email
2012-12-06 17:05:08

that was almost funny dear troll.

Piers Morgan shows his complete and unhinged bias:

MORGAN to Morano: OK. Look, I respect that you have views. I don’t think they’re facts and there are many scientists who would take issue with you about the use of the word facts.

Yes, because claiming that our population is growing is tied to an increasing CO2 level is completely factual. Tying an increasing CO2 level to a “HYPOTHESIZED” warming world (when there hasn’t been any warming) is completely factual.

OMG… there are more people, therefore there must be global warming and so we must cut CO2 to save the planet!!

Just wait till they trot out the “we need to trim the population” meme to save the planet.

 
Comment by JGlanton
2012-12-07 04:23:12

Piers Morgan acted like a 10-year old boy, especially when he closed with his snide comment about it being 60 degrees that day. Sure is weird, he said. Ooooooh, must be globull warming. What an idiot.

 
Comment by Otter
2012-12-07 06:07:03

Teach, I think johnny boi hangs at the edge of his seat, waiting for each and every climate post you make, just so he can be first to say NOTHING.

 
Comment by Trish
2012-12-07 07:58:31

That was sweet. Piers Morgan is a typical elitist liberal whiner worshipping at the altar of AGW, who wouldn’t be negatively affected by climate change taxation like we all would, and probably likes the idea of population control.
Morano was convincing, Nye sounded almost as whiny and ill informed as Morgan did.
Thank you for the links, I will be keeping this one for future arguments about the weather of the day!!!

 
Comment by Gumball_Brains Subscribed to comments via email
2012-12-07 10:13:32

Wow, am glad that I found your excellent topic blog post.

Would please tell me how you handle sex toy hacking dicks?

 
Comment by JGlanton
2012-12-07 14:21:47

I thought is was funny that CNN chose an engineer/entertainer to debate the AGW side. Couldn’t they find a real climatologist with the guts to stand up and debate? I guess not. They are rare as hen’s teeth.

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Bad Behavior has blocked 12382 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE