Will Michigan also shut down all their airports? Ports? Fossil fueled vehicle plants?
Michigan Wants to Make Big Oil Pay for Climate Change
We’ve known for a while now that Big Oil is freaking out about climate change lawsuits. For months, their lobbyists have been urging Congress to pass a liability waiver so they can’t be sued for climate damages. Recently, the American Petroleum Institute, or API, the industry’s largest and most powerful fossil fuel trade association, declared that ending “abusive state climate lawsuits” is one of its top priorities for 2026.
But if Big Oil was nervous before, they should be feeling absolutely terrified now, following the filing of a new lawsuit last week by Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel. This one uses a different approach, alleging that the fossil fuel industry engaged in anticompetitive conduct, in violation of state and federal antitrust laws.
Most of the climate accountability cases to date have been filed under state consumer protection laws; antitrust is not yet a central part of how people understand our climate crisis. But over the last four years, there has been a revolution in the antitrust field. We’ve seen antitrust laws, long semidormant, applied in areas ranging from pharmaceuticals to fast-food wages to housing costs to health insurance—issues that hadn’t been the focus of antitrust challenges before. Michigan’s complaint demonstrates that Big Oil’s climate conspiracy also fits this framework remarkably well.
Um, ok, but, they can only sue using state law, not federal, and only in so much if they can prove fossil fuels companies, which the state of Michigan uses heavily for its operations, engaged in anticompetitive behavior per the law. Because any attempt to look outside the state could see the suit killed off just like the New Jersey one.
A key purpose of federal and state antitrust laws is to stop businesses from combining “in restraint of trade” to unfairly shut out competitors and deprive society of the benefits of competition. Antitrust laws were designed to protect open, thriving markets. They prevent existing companies from colluding against new entrants in the market, a practice that serves to slow down innovation and freeze technologies in place.
What if it’s government combining to stop the competition of fossil fuels companies and those who sell them and those that use them in their products?
Michigan’s lawsuit argues that Big Oil engaged in exactly this kind of shut-out-the-upstarts collusion against renewable energies—a decades-long conspiracy to, according to the initial filing, “forestall meaningful competition from renewable energy and maintain their dominance in the energy market.”
Can they prove it as it would apply against Michigan companies? Anyhow, blah blah in the article, but, none of the Warmists are giving up their own use of fossil fuels.
It may seem counterintuitive but private companies and capitalists hate free markets and anti-trust laws. Monopolies and oligopolies, permitting price fixing, are desired.
Is Mad King Donald colluding with Big Oil to stanch the development with renewables and nucular?
It’s more like sane President Trump is trying to keep costs down for Americans.
All of these cities and states can sue the fuel companies for all sorts of things, but, in the end, the corporations won’t pay: they’ll simply raise fees on consumers to pay whatever they are assessed, meaning that revenues to the government will be raised without politicians having to vote for higher taxes, and the public will be combitching about how much everything costs.
The Mad King is the useful idiot doing the bidding of his fellow plutocrats, who care only that they stay in control.
“President Trump is trying to keep costs down for Americans. “How is that working out?
Higher prices for fossil fuels affects consumption to cover the negative externalities associated with their use (market mismatch).
I’m in Northern Michigan, snowing like a bitch up here right now. House is heated with propane. Pole barn heated with kerosine and propane. Hot tub, well guess what. Electricity, from coal and natural gas plants.
Does Dana Nessel offer an alternative way to heat our homes. Of course not. She is just another democratic mouth piece that is hell bent on destroying a way of life hell and having us live in a world of “You will own nothing and be happy”.
I didn’t take your covid stab and I will not take any of your other bull-$hit.
Mr Tidal Wave wrote:
House is heated with an electric heat pump-based HVAC system, but when the weather gets colder than 20º F, the heat pump has trouble keeping the house comfortably warm.
And so we have our propane fireplace. I’ll admit it: we may have spent more time in the recliners enjoying the fireplace than absolutely necessary the past few days, but the 250 gallon propane tank was topped off in December, and there’s still plenty left.
We also lost electricity for three hours on Sunday, but the propane fireplace does not require electricity to run. We stayed nice and warm. And while we lost power for only three hours, there were plenty of the electric company’s customers who were without power for a couple of days.
Ouch! I see that Michigan has a rather high kwh cost at 20 cents those coal plants are super old due to phase o????ut by 2032 7 years
Johnny-you’ll be happy to know that the demand for coal reached another all time high in 2025
Mao Cultural Revolution Survivor: “Minneapolis Protests Are A Communist Insurrection” Video
https://commoncts.blogspot.com/2026/01/mao-cultural-revolution-survivor.html