Pro-lifers Should Be Concerned With ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Or Something

Does this mean the pro-murder folks shouldn’t be concerned? This is just another hot-take designed to increase the membership of the Cult of Climastrology

Pro-lifers should be concerned about climate change | Opinion

Toddlers will melt your heart with their innocence, trust, and wide-eyed wonderment. Their mischievous curiosity and determination to sit, stand, crawl, walk, run, talk and read rouses us to wonder what great contributions they will make to humanity when they’re grown. One can see why pro-life supporters oppose abortion.

A vexing question is, where’s the fierce opposition from “pro-life, sanctity of life people” to political policies that jeopardize today’s toddlers’ futures once they’re outside the womb? A large majority of pro-lifers vote for the political party whose policies support for-profit wars, assault weapon ownership, foster environmental degradation, and deny climate change.

Out of the above policies, the most formidable threat to our children’s futures, along with the rest of humanity, is climate change.

If it’s such a threat, why do so many cultists refuse to make their own lives carbon neutral?

Additionally, the Trump Administration is working fast and hard to promote fossil fuels making it impossible to reach that goal. Not only are they condemning American citizens, they’re sealing the fate of all life to an uninhabitable planet.

So, how old will today’s toddlers be in 2050 when, if we fail to cut carbon emissions to zero, they’ll have to try to survive in a hostile atmosphere? Are any of them your children or grandchildren?

If your pro-life beliefs are that important to you, how hard will you fight to get our government to cut CO2 emissions to zero by 2050 in order to preserve today’s toddlers’ sanctity of life?

If they had actual science, they’d show it. Since they don’t, they have to trot out unhinged feelings based attempts to shame. Just like good little cultists.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

21 Responses to “Pro-lifers Should Be Concerned With ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Or Something”

  1. Professor hale says:

    If it’s such a threat, why do so many cultists refuse to make their own lives carbon neutral?

    Carbon neutral is a dodge for the uncommitted. If they were serious, they’d go for carbon zero. If they breathe, they are the problem, not the solution.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The so-called and self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” are really pro-birthers. They care little for the living.

    TEACH (scam) claims, falsely of course, that if “they” had science they would show it. What evidence does TEACH need to understand why the Earth is warming rapidly from CO2 added to the atmosphere?

    If there is no evidence that he’d find persuasive it means he’s part of the Cult of Denial (COD).

    • formwiz says:

      The so-called and self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” are really pro-birthers. They care little for the living.

      Apparently, the Lefties care a lot less. How else to explain the Democrat-run big cities are hellholes of murder and rape, with the Left financing prosecutors who let the savages run wild?

      What evidence does TEACH need to understand why the Earth is warming rapidly from CO2 added to the atmosphere?

      Facts, for a start.

      And I don’t see any Lefties emptying their tills to support unwed mothers.

    • Kye says:

      “The so-called and self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” are really pro-birthers. They care little for the living.”

      Really? How many black inner city kids did you foster? I fostered two. How many poor folks did you give their first job to? I did hundreds. How many kids who couldn’t afford school did you pay for? I did several.

      Last year I left my Lutheran church because when they decided that a married, female dyke would be a pastor that was the end for me. But I did tithe for 12% of my income. Of course when I left, the tithe stopped. So what June and I did was rather than ignore the plight of the needy we would tithe to charities instead of the church. We decided on St. Judes Hospital for Children, The Shriners Hospital for Children and Covenant House, each getting a third or about 4%. Not including other smaller donations I make from time to time such as Boys Town, that 12% tithe comes to over $35,000 per year. And before you say I’m bragging I want you to realize these charities were made known to you because you unjustly challenged my(our) compassion when you don’t know a damn thing about what we do.

      So besides yourself, who do you help? And before you start telling other people what they are like caring “little for the living” I suggest you open that welded shut mind of yours and stop projecting your own greed, jealousy and hate on others. Just because you don’t care doesn’t mean we don’t.

      Therein lies the difference between Christian love and atheist hate. All the left has is hate.

      Trump 2020 Keep America, America.

      “All of leftism is a creed without a guiding moral force. The spot where God should be standing is filled by the leftists themselves, a giant unthinking collective driven by an indistinct and ever-shifting desire to be important, to save the world from its sinful self without ever using the word ‘sin.’”
      https://youtu.be/EYhguQeX2xQ

      • Marshall Gill says:

        Kyle, it simply fascinates me how many people argue that supporting socialism, an ideology responsible for the deaths of 100,000,000 people during the 20th century, is “caring”.

        It is the old bait and switch. First they claim that the pre-born are not alive or are not human or have no right to live. Then, when the baseness of their claim is presented back to them, they shift to claiming that caring equals socialism.

        Pity them.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Are the Social Democracies of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel etc dangers to America and the world?

          If the USA adopted similar policies would we be a socialist or communist nation?

          Is universal healthcare, progressive taxation, worker safeguards, a stronger safety net really symbols of communism?

          Or… is this just another right-wing scare tactic, much like the conspiracy tale that expanded background checks will lead to total firearm confiscation? We hope it’s a tactic and not something right-wingers actually believe, which would be delusional.

          Much of the right-wing scare tactics have a primary intent – the re-election of trump – and not because his supporters feel he will make material changes in their lives (he actually harms the working classes), but for a purely emotional reason – he hates those liberal elites who look down their noses at the “bitter clingers” and “bucket of deplorables”.

          • formwiz says:

            Are the Social Democracies of Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Israel etc dangers to America and the world?

            Since Israel is something of a theocracy, it’s an exception, but the rest rather blindly fall into lockstep with all the Lefty trends unquestionably. That’s a danger to their own people as well as us.

            If the USA adopted similar policies would we be a socialist or communist nation?

            Duh.

            Or… is this just another right-wing scare tactic, much like the conspiracy tale that expanded background checks will lead to total firearm confiscation? We hope it’s a tactic and not something right-wingers actually believe, which would be delusional.

            The Lefties have a long-documented tactic of incrementalism. Certainly worked for Hitler.

            As is telling people they’re just being paranoid when they notice what’s going on.

            Much of the right-wing scare tactics have a primary intent – the re-election of Trump – and not because his supporters feel he will make material changes in their lives (he actually harms the working classes), but for a purely emotional reason – he hates those liberal elites who look down their noses at the “bitter clingers” and “bucket of deplorables”.

            Yeah, that’s why the “working classes” went for Trump last time and will do again, because of all the economic good he did them. It’s the welfare classes that vote Democrat.

            And the Hildabeast shooting off her mouth is what helped beat her last time.

            And it’s “basket of deplorables”. God, what an ignoramus.

          • IB_Joe says:

            All the scare tactics are coming from the left. The population explosion, the hole in the ozone layer, black mold, global warming, climate change, covid…. Stop trying to scare people with your psychotic insecurities or socialist fantasies, whichever it is.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Kye,

        We should all be grateful for what you’ve done and do for your community.

        You are absolutely correct that I don’t know you, I only know what you type. That said, why slur your Lutheran pastor?

        One has to be cautious about how much personal information one posts, as commenters here have been known to take that information and post telephone numbers, workplace names and addresses, and even try to hack company networks.

        • formwiz says:

          I’m sure Jeffery regrets his name getting out.

        • Kye says:

          Elwood, I try not to post any information which could be attributed only to me and therefore be tracked down. I do admit to saying more than I should in this day and age but I sincerely am trying to make a point. A good point. I’ve told you before but I’ll mention it once more; I don’t hate anybody. Not even people who have done me personal harm. I do hate ideologies that preach hate and tyranny like Islam or communism or Nazism. But I consider the poor souls who follow such teachings to be misguided and perhaps brainwashed fools. Now don’t get me wrong, not hating someone does not mean I wouldn’t put a bullet through him in a second if I believe he is a threat to my family or my country.

          I was not slurring my Lutheran pastor, I was pointing out that my Lutheran church, by allowing two practicing homosexuals to teach the Word of God has blasphemed His Name and corrupted the church that is supposed to represent Him. In Christianity practicing perversion is an abomination but we don’t hate the people who do it, rather we would prefer to help them. However, in modern America practicing sodomy or other sexual perversions among same sex persons is considered a “right” not a sin and therefore any attempt to help these poor unfortunate souls both physically and spiritually is verboten.

          So they troop on creating new perverts and new sinners along their way and the next thing you know there are lawsuits against the church, the Boy Scouts and eleven year old girls are made sex objects in movies. Such is the state of the moral soul of America today.

          Trump 2020 Keep the commies out of power.

          There’s no religious basis for anti-racism, for example. Even if there was, the people screaming about racism are flamboyantly opposed to religion. There’s nothing in our history or traditions that can be the moral authority for something like anti-racism. Republican virtue demands equality before the law and support for the basics of citizenship, but it does not require you to live next door to a black guy. In fact, it opposes such a requirement.

          Most of the current taboos are deliberately conceived to contradict religion and tradition, which are dismissed as white privilege. The normal impulse to be around those with whom you have something in common has been anathematized in order to damage the normal functioning of society. Sending men dressed as women into the schools, while demanding everyone celebrate it, is nothing more than an outlandish rebuke of religion and tradition. Its only purpose is spite.

          The same can be said for the whole catalog of modern taboos. There is no moral authority for them. There’s no logical basis for them either. A society that thinks sexualizing children is acceptable cannot rationally claim it is immoral to oppose the normalizing of men in dresses. The only authority for the current taboos is the force wielded by the taboo makers. They have control of the institutions and use that power to enforce these taboos on society.
          the Zman, 8/21/20

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Kye,

    You did slur your pastor as a dyke. She’s a woman who has devoted her life to Christianity. It’s been common for Christians (even gay Christians) and non-Christians to demonize homosexuals for some reason. You’re certainly entitled to choose where and even if you worship just as your pastor had the right to love and to marry whomever she wanted. Just like the Islamists, you’re of the feeling that adult same-sex relationships are sinful. You’re entitled to that opinion. But if you think your feelings entitle you to “fix” them “physically” or “spiritually”, you’re sadly mistaken. To you, are same-sex relationships worse than adultery (mentioned in the Ten Commandments)? Do you now accept adultery in modern society?

    Many of the stories that TEACH promotes originate from JimHoft of the Gateway Pundit. Hoft is a homosexual married to man. Your buddy formwiz almost exclusively cites the Pundit.

    Your suggestions that homosexuals are pedophiles is unfounded. Some are. Most aren’t. We can say the same of heterosexual men and women. Not all Catholic priests are pedophiles. Not all Lutheran ministers are pedophiles. http://www.stopbaptistpredators.org/article07/path_to_healing.html

    At what age is it OK to turn females into sex objects? TEACH regularly posts photos of teen girls in various stages of undress for the titillation of his mostly male readers.

    Most of the current taboos are deliberately conceived to contradict religion and tradition… Now, now. It’s not always about you and your religious beliefs. The taboos against demonizing other humans, e.g., same-sex relationships, Muslims, immigrants, transgendered, Black Americans, are not conceived to harm religion but rather to support Americans who are oppressed. It’s about personal freedom. Criticizing your slurs against fellow Americans is not an attack on your religion, it’s a defense of our common humanity.

    Would you like blasphemy laws to be reinstated? How about laws against same-sex relationships and acts? How about modesty/indecent exposure laws – no thongs, no bikinis, no low cut dresses, etc.

    There have been busybodies forever. People who wish to dictate how people dress and act. We protect children in our society, but we can all agree it’s wrong to depict girls as sexual objects.

    • formwiz says:

      You did slur your pastor as a dyke. She’s a woman who has devoted her life to Christianity. It’s been common for Christians (even gay Christians) and non-Christians to demonize homosexuals for some reason.

      Well, there is that business in the Old Testament, not to mention they’re mentally ill, spreaders of venereal disease, and many of the perverts and child molesters.

      More professional courtesy?

      Just like the Islamists, you’re of the feeling that adult same-sex relationships are sinful. You’re entitled to that opinion. But if you think your feelings entitle you to “fix” them “physically” or “spiritually”, you’re sadly mistaken. To you, are same-sex relationships worse than adultery (mentioned in the Ten Commandments)? Do you now accept adultery in modern society?

      No one should. It causes a lot of harm, but obviously, you don’t mind the harm caused to other people. You just want what you want.

      Hey, I thought you were the one who respected Moslems, but here you’re bad-mouthing them.

      And your understanding of Christianity and Islam is lacking. Both are proselytizing religions. Trum believers are bound to save the sinners.

      Many of the stories that TEACH promotes originate from JimHoft of the Gateway Pundit. Hoft is a homosexual married to man. Your buddy formwiz almost exclusively cites the Pundit.

      No, but he does cite his stuff, unlike you. I also get my stuff from Surber, Insty, Zero Hedge, WND, and a lot of other places. And they all cite their stuff.

      You’re just made because the Hofts are better than you.

      Your suggestions that homosexuals are pedophiles is unfounded. Some are. Most aren’t. We can say the same of heterosexual men and women. Not all Catholic priests are pedophiles. Not all Lutheran ministers are pedophiles.

      Funny, but when the Church and the Boy Scouts let all the queers in, that’s when the molestation began. Funny how most of theird is on the queer side of the ledger.

      Again, professional courtesy?

      Now, now. It’s not always about you and your religious beliefs. The taboos against demonizing other humans, e.g., same-sex relationships, Muslims, immigrants, transgendered, black Americans, are not conceived to harm religion but rather to support Americans who are oppressed.

      Those aren’t taboos. The Left has no problem maligning and stereotyping anybody who dares stray off the plantation. And the people you cite are hardly oppressed.

      How many queers, blacks, Moslems, and gendernuts are in politics, show biz, business, etc?

      It’s about personal freedom. Criticizing your slurs against fellow Americans is not an attack on your religion, it’s a defense of our common humanity.

      Your business of turning people into non-persons is to stifle dissent.

      Would you like blasphemy laws to be reinstated? How about laws against same-sex relationships and acts? How about modesty/indecent exposure laws – no thongs, no bikinis, no low cut dresses, etc.

      I have no problem with it. When a couple of the Demos leave SCUS in the next few years, I expect Lawrence will go bye-byes.

      There have been busybodies forever. People who wish to dictate how people dress and act. We protect children in our society, but we can all agree it’s wrong to depict girls as sexual objects.

      Oh, you mean ever since there’s been such a backlash against Cuties? I thought your crowd was all about sex before 8 or else it’s too late.

      And yours is the side dictating to people. And your record says children aren’t safe around people like you.

    • Kye says:

      If you think dyke is a slur then you don’t know any dykes. You jammed so much shit into your “response” I’d have to type till Tucker tonight to rebut you and that ain’t happening. Suffice it to say you seem to have more of a problem with my beliefs and opinions than I do with theirs.

      I do have the right to decide where to worship but my “pastor” has polluted the Church with abomination. I made my decision and left. I did not start an anti-dyke movement to get rid of the two lezzies. I left. I harmed no one yet you call me out like I’m the blasphemer.

      Last point cause I’m not spending all day on an insane tirade by a non believer.
      “Your suggestions that homosexuals are pedophiles is unfounded. Some are. Most aren’t”
      I did not suggest that homosexuals are pedophiles. Some aren’t, most are. Any place where homosexuals are present will eventually degrade into sodomy and pedophilia. Again, check the Catholic church and the Boy Scouts if you don’t believe me. BTW, many, many instances of gay pedophilia are suppressed and hidden to protect NOT THE CHILDREN but the gays.

      I am friends with several gay guys and every single one was recruited as a child by a queer. Every one. And they admit it. And most before high school. You really need to read up on the facts of homosexuality , not the leftist “feel good” talking points. It’s a disgusting, vile sinful perversion but they can be helped. You just don’t want them helped for political reasons. You usual motivation.

      That’s all I’m gonna say on this subject because I am arguing with a person who is incapable of separating his “feelings” from rights.

      Trump 2020 Because there is a difference between right and wrong and the left is wrong.

      From Rudyard to you, Elwood:

      The Stranger within my gate,
      He may be true or kind,
      But he does not talk my talk–
      I cannot feel his mind.
      I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
      But not the soul behind.
      The men of my own stock,
      They may do ill or well,
      But they tell the lies I am wanted to,
      They are used to the lies I tell;
      And we do not need interpreters
      When we go to buy or sell.
      The Stranger within my gates,
      He may be evil or good,
      But I cannot tell what powers control–
      What reasons sway his mood;
      Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
      Shall repossess his blood.
      The men of my own stock,
      Bitter bad they may be,
      But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
      And see the things I see;
      And whatever I think of them and their likes
      They think of the likes of me.
      This was my father’s belief
      And this is also mine:
      Let the corn be all one sheaf–
      And the grapes be all one vine,
      Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
      By bitter bread and wine.

      And of course, we all know what today’s bien-pensants think of Kipling.

  4. formwiz says:

    I bet Good, Deutscher and Fuller do too.

    We have nothing to hide.

  5. drowningpuppies says:

    The thing is if Rimjob can’t take it maybe he should stop dishing it out.
    Capisce?

    But we know that ain’t gonna happen.

    So f#ck him.

    Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  6. IB_Joe says:

    All the scare tactics are coming from the left. The population explosion, the hole in the ozone layer, black mold, global warming, climate change, covid…. Stop trying to scare people with your psychotic insecurities or socialist fantasies, whichever it is.

  7. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    population explosion, the hole in the ozone layer, black mold, global warming, climate change, covid

    All real.

Bad Behavior has blocked 10146 access attempts in the last 7 days.