If All You See…

…is a city flooded by carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is No Tricks Zone, with a post on physicists saying clouds mostly control climate, with humans accounting for about .01C per 100 years.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. formwiz says:

    If you think the Pelosi Galore-Occasional Cortex feud is fun, try this one on for size; headline:

    San Francisco: wealthy opponents of new shelter claim homeless are bad for environment.

    If you know anything about the French Revolution, you know how this ends.

    • Professor Hale says:

      Are you saying this is a “let them eat cake” moment? I disagree. Homeless people are notoriously drug addicts and crazy people. They don’t follow politics or care about local city policies. You could publish on the front page of the paper that homeless would be rounded up to be used as Dog food and it is unlikely any of them would know about it.

      • formwiz says:

        I’m saying this is a Maximilien Robespierre-Georges Danton-Jean-Paul Marat moment.

        “Let ’em eat Sara Lee” was supposed to have caused it, not ended it.

  2. JGlanton says:

    I thought maybe she was a one-armed Instagrammer, but I found out that Angie Verona does have both of her arms and she needs them to put on a pair of these shredded jeans:


    Fun fact: Did you know that Instagram use contributes more greenhouse gasses than Exxon? Girls like her are a big reason why. Tax that!

  3. formwiz says:

    Winning. And how Jeffery will scream.

    The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday ruled in favor of the Trump administration’s efforts to prioritize federal dollars for local policing to towns and cities that complied with certain immigration policies.

    IOW Sanctuary cities get less police money than ones that care about Americans.

    Talk about Let ’em eat Twinkies.

    PS Since the bunny suit says we’re all hypocrites because we swing by Gateway now and again, take a look at the 2 posts about how a former Border Patrol chief ripped Occasional Cortex and the rest of the anti-Americans a new one about the “tragedy” of illegal kids.

    Remember, at least 30% of them were not traveling with family. Jeffery Epstein, pick up the white courtesy telephone.

    • gitarcarver says:


      Maryland and D.C. officials sue President Trump, alleging he’s violating the Constitution’s Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses by maintaining an ownership interest in the Trump Organization while president. That “global business empire”—which includes the Trump International Hotel in D.C. (in which the president has a 76% interest), the Trump towers in Manhattan, and income from the international distribution of The Apprentice—provides him with millions of dollars from foreign and local governments. Fourth Circuit: Maryland and the District lack standing to bring this “extraordinary” suit against the president in either his official capacity or his individual capacity.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Unlike Sibley, we respect the courts. Sibley and the tRumpublicans consider the courts tools to be used to consolidate power and oppress the non-Cons.

      • Kye says:

        Your ability to project and be totally self unaware is pathological! No one, absolutely no one misuses the courts more for political lawfare than leftists. If you actually read the news instead of propaganda you’d know that. Always have and always will until we get rid of them. Why do you think they always talk about stacking the courts? Why do you think they currently have RBG under lock and key and away from public scrutiny? The crazy old bitch is on the ninth stage of Alzheimer and may even be on ice. It’s “Weekend at Bernie’s” at the SC. They’re proppin’ the old bat up.

        Trump 2020 End DemCom lawfare Bring back Justice in America!

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:


          Merrick Garland ring a bell?

          Your ability to project and be totally self-unaware is pathological. It’s diagnostic of the Con “mind”.

          Much of what Cons believe is untrue.

          • formwiz says:

            No law said Cocaine Mitch had to run Garland. It was considered a courtesy.

            Lefties love playing hardball, but hate it when somebody else wins.

            And the word you want is emblematic or indicative. Diagnostic in the sense you use it is a noun.

            Everything Lefties believe is untrue.


        • Elwood P. Dowd says:


          As said many times, Republicans are clever, smart and ruthless compared to the pollyannish Dems. For decades the Repubs have been outwitting the Dems both at the local and national level. Repubs draw up most of the districts. At the state levels Repubs get to make most of the elections laws, suppressing the votes of minorities.

          The Repubs are now re-proposing that representation not be based on population but on eligible voters! Children don’t count?

          There are only two ways a minority can rule a majority: cheating or force. The trumpublicans favor both.

          • formwiz says:

            Actually, that describes the Demos. As always, you project.

            The Repubs are now re-proposing that representation not be based on population but on eligible voters! Children don’t count?

            No, they want representation based on citizens. As always, you lie.

            That’s what liars do.

            Repubs draw up most of the districts. At the state levels Repubs get to make most of the elections laws, suppressing the votes of minorities.

            Try again. You guys insisted on designated black voting districts.

            The Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires what AP referred to as “racially gerrymandered congressional boundaries.”

            You would not have a 35-member Congressional Black Caucus in the House without racial gerrymandering.

            It is required — especially in the Deep South.

            The NAACP lobbied for the law, which Democrats overwhelmingly supported.

            So you painted yourselves into that corner.

          • Kye says:

            You may not have noticed Elwood, but this is a Republic. Nobody is supposed to “rule” anybody. But that’s not how you see it is it? You leftists no longer officially recognize tea Constitution since it stands in your way on so many issues (like the Electoral College). You the Green New America as a democracy with the only party being DemComs after allowing millions of non-citizens to vote, harvesting and early voting, stuffing the ballot boxes, “finding” boxes of all DemCon votes weeks after the election and of course the DemCons favorite old standby: dead people voting! And if that all fails take it to court and try to win there. Sue yourselves into office!

            Trump 2020 Cause America is too precious to leave to Democrat Communists!

      • formwiz says:


        Without the courts, there would be no abortion, no same sex marriage.

        You respect them as long as you control them.

        • Kye says:

          Don’t forget without the courts there would be no Obamacare. There would also be a question of citizenship on the census. We could name probably 100 leftist initiatives or court decisions rendering the people’s desires moot in just the last two years if we took the time.

          Trump 2020 Cause if the courts are gonna be crooked they may as well work for us!

Pirate's Cove