Good News: Abortions Can Be Funny

If we had a competent RNC this kind of stuff would end up in ads that would devastate Democrats

Notice, this is in a magazine meant for teens and pre-teens. These people are bat shit insane.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Good News: Abortions Can Be Funny”

  1. Jeffery says:

    So threatening women and calling them murderers is OK, but making fun of the attackers is bat-shit insane?

    We understand that people have differing, deeply-held opinions regarding the morality of abortion that break along political affiliations. The abortion rate in the US has been steadily decreasing since the peak in the early ’80s, and may be below the rate of illegal abortions performed pre-Roe v Wade.

    Most women seeking abortion are young (~ 70% under 30), poor (75%), undereducated, but Christian (62%; Protestant, Evangelical and Catholic).

    In 2014, 80% of service providers reported some level of harassment, mostly picketing and telephone calls, with 3% receiving bomb threats.

    In 1973, the US Supreme Court affirmed a woman’s right to obtain a therapeutic abortion.

    The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state’s interests in regulating abortions: protecting women’s health and protecting the potentiality of human life. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.

    • formwiz says:

      No, it invented something out of thin air and the court has been chipping away at it ever since. Casey v Planned Barrenhood, f’rinstance.

      And murdering a kid is OK in your book?

    • bob says:

      there is no right to privacy in the 14th amendment. the “court” created a right out of nowhere using there personal opinion, not the Constitution. abortion was already legal in about half the states before roe v. wade. the court just federalized it. if roe is ever overturned it will go back to the states where it belongs. and hopefully some babies may be saved from being ripped apart. here’s an idea. for their party these stupid bitches could show films of their babies being ripped apart.

  2. Back to the original subject, though. Is it funny?

    • Jeffery says:

      Not to me, but neither are the 3 Stooges, the KKK, Donnie tRump, racism, Martin Lawrence or Andrew Dice Clay.

  3. Jeffery says:

    We oppose murder. But abortion is not murder.

    And your own (lack of) actions belie your accusations. Why aren’t you fighting tooth and nail to stop these murders of babies? If you actually believed your own words you wouldn’t stand idly while hundreds of thousands of babies were murdered.

    If you and the GOP get your way, and therapeutic abortions are declared illegal, what punishment would you recommend? Since you claim it’s murder, and certainly it’s willful and premeditated by a woman and provider, it seems it’s murder in the 1st. In some states, the killing of child, even lacking willfulness and premeditation, can be considered 1st degree murder. Do you prefer the death penalty or life without parole for both the woman and provider?

    If not, why not?

    • McGehee says:

      If the GOP gets its way, the authority over abortion law will revert to the states where it was before Roe.

      Seriously, Jeff: decaf.

      • Jeffery says:

        So? And at the state level would you recommend charges of 1st degree murder against a woman and doctor who committed murder (abortion)? It’s not a difficult question.

        Or do you agree that abortion is not murder?

    • formwiz says:

      The Hell it’s not.

      Gassing Jews wasn’t murder, either. Lynching blacks wasn’t murder,.

      And good people have been fighting abortion for years. We just do it through legal means, not lynch mobs like the Left.

      Hang the butcher. Most of the women have been conned by people like you, telling them it’s just a clump of cells.

      Too bad ultrasound makes a liar out of you.

      • Jeffery says:

        j,

        So your plan allows a woman seeking/obtaining an abortion to get off scot-free?

        Why? Isn’t she a party in 1st Degree murder? If not, why not?

        Women obtained abortions prior to Roe v Wade. Now that there a medicines that induce abortion how do you regulate it?

  4. Chuck says:

    If you, Jeffery, believe that killing a baby in the womb is NOT “murder” because a “law” says it’s not, then you are being willfully blind to science and reason. This is the quintessential definition of “the law” being an ASS!!!
    What to do? Revoke the medical license of the abortion provider. Abortion seeker? “Three Strikes” rule: 1. House arrest. 2. One year in jail. 3. Incarceration for 20 years.

    You asked…..

    • Jeffery says:

      Would you also investigate every so-called “miscarriage” as a potential murder? What if you find that the woman was a smoker, an alcoholic or took legal medications with the potential for miscarriage? How do you know that all the hundreds of thousands of miscarriages are natural?

      Would you leave a state that allowed therapeutic abortions and move to one that banned them? Would you support a federal law banning abortions? Would you support a government police force to investigate and enforce your proposed laws, e.g., how do you keep women from getting morning after pills, or chemical abortifacient pills, investigating miscarriages etc.

      Would you have murder exemptions for rape victims, 13 year old incest victims or the few women who might die from a full term pregnancy?

      Would you ban IUDs which anti-abortionists say prevent implantation of the “baby”? Morning after pills?

      So you would make abortion a “special” case of 1st Degree murder, with house arrest as the punishment? For 1st Degree murder? Why? If it’s the murder of a baby in the womb why not punish it as such? Many states still execute those convicted of 1st Degree murder.

      You don’t even believe abortion is murder. You make it seem more like stealing a pizza.

Pirate's Cove