If All You See…

…is a world dried out from Other People’s carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is MOTUS A.D., with a post on #SooperSunday.

It’s armed women of Israel week, as recommended by Steve Eggleston.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

40 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. Jeffery says:

    Why is Don Juan tRump trying to silence Stormy Daniels? He’s preparing to launch a suit against 60 Minutes to prevent them from interviewing Ms. Daniels. Well, any good dictator needs to exert government control over critics.

    Maybe he can get his Federal agents to “silence” her. Maybe he can persuade his “militia” of AR-15 toting tRumpitistas to “take out” some media. All he needs is say the word. His “brown shirts” await his orders.

    • formwiz says:

      She’s being silenced?

      Oh, yeah, I keep forgetting Lefties don’t recall how many times she’s said it never happened.

  2. Jeffery says:

    The NRA and Ronald Reagan once opposed the right to open carry – when the Black Panthers exercised it.

    “There is absolutely no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.” — California Gov. Ronald Reagan in 1967, after signing the Mulford Act.

    Reagan wrecked the middle class AND didn’t want you carrying guns!

  3. Jeffery says:

    We may have missed your “proof” that human-generated CO2 has caused “greening” of Earth. Here’s an article discussing it.

    Do you accept the NASA scientists’ conclusions as proof of your contention?

    If so, why?


  4. Jl says:

    Why yes. But if they start adjusting the color like they do temperatures, I might have to reconsider.

  5. Jeffery says:

    We’re certain they’re concerned about your opinion.

    But if they start adjusting the color like they do temperatures,

    So you really believe the “warming” is a hoax?

    Can you identify the proof that atmospheric CO2 is causing “greening”? In your amateur opinion is the physical link between CO2 and “greening” stronger than the link between CO2 and warming?

    Is it possible you accept the limited data on “greening” while rejecting the voluminous data on warming because you have no ideological/political objections to “greening”?

    • formwiz says:

      Well, when you consider the data and the studies, not to mention the critiques and “peer” reviews were all phony,


  6. Jeffery says:

    “While the detection of greening is based on data, the attribution to various drivers is based on models,” said co-author Josep Canadell of the Oceans and Atmosphere Division in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Canberra, Australia…

    So they measure greening with satellite spectroscopy but the cause (CO2 vs sunlight vs warming vs N2) is attributed by modeling. Does that give you pause? That is good enough “proof” from a skeptic such as you?

  7. Jeffery says:

    Don the Con is picking winners and losers.

    Harley-Davidson, already sputtering, will likely die as The Con drives a stake through its heart with his tariffs (and the inevitable retaliation).

  8. formwiz says:

    Bet every one of those girls could throw a hand grenade.

  9. Jl says:

    “So you believe warming is a hoax?” There’s that reading comprehension that J is infamous for. Never said it wasn’t warming-it’s been warming since before elevated CO2 levels. Just the amount and the cause. “Can you identify the proof CO2 is causing the greening?” Oh, I don’t know-maybe several hundred years of greenhouse use showing increased greening and growth rate with no other variables thrown in for starters. The fact that no one doubts the fact that more CO2 causes more greening? The fact that there aren’t hundreds of research papers out contradicting the fact that CO2 causes greening, like there is disputing the cause and or amount of warming?

    • Jeffery says:

      You’re making progress, admitting finally that it’s warming! But if it’s actually warming, how are the scientists cooking the books?

      And it’s interesting that you believe atmospheric CO2 can have a significant effect on a physical process. We’re aware of the laboratory experiments demonstrating CO2 induced plant growth, but do you have direct proof it’s happening outside the laboratory? (LOL- We’re just mocking you with your own argument.)

      Anyway, you believe the bit of evidence on greening because you’ve not been told to oppose it by your masters. “Greening” is not a threat to an entire industry, as global warming is.

  10. Jl says:

    But you’re not, as no one, including me, has ever said it wasn’t warming. But nice try. “You have direct proof it’s happening outside the laboratory? ”. Why yes, greenhouses, where, unlike the outside atmosphere, the only variable is CO2. But thanks for asking.

    • Jeffery says:

      LOL. So under the contrived conditions of a greenhouse, increasing “atmospheric” CO2 causes plant growth? How about in the real world? (Sorry, just giving your arguments back to you, LOL).

      Why can’t you give any direct evidence that CO2 produced in the US or China is causing increased plant growth?

      Do you think that infrared radiation leaving the Earth, and headed out to space, can interact with atmospheric CO2?

    • Jeffery says:

      And TEACH can chip in here too. If it’s really warming, what’s your gripe with climate scientists? Do you still think they’re perpetrating a hoax? If it’s really warming, what’s your concern about “siting” of thermometers?

  11. Jeffery says:

    What’s the over-under on tRump calling Rep. Waters a “nigger”? His base (the ignorati) will go nuts!

  12. drowningpuppies says:

    Mow the frickin’ grass. … That’s going to stop MS-13. … Mow that frickin’ grass! … Man, shes crazy, but shes a fine woman. She is. I actually like Nancy Pelosi. Can you believe that? Her and Maxine Waters. How about that one? Maxine Waters, He must be impeached! That’s all she knows how to say, He must be impeached! Impeached! …

    But hes done nothing wrong. Doesn’t matter, they say. What has he done wrong? I don’t know! You got to be impeached! And then I say … I get in trouble for this, She has to immediately, take an IQ test. And people go crazy. They went crazy/ But Maxine and Nancy and these people, there’s a lot of hatred. There’s so much hatred we have to stop Mike. We have to stop the hatred.

    Donny Dangerfield


  13. Jeffery says:

    Most Con Men are afraid to say “nigger” out in the open any more, although they say it constantly in private (e.g., tRump behind the scenes at You’re Fired! – it’s why he forced all to sign non-disclosure agreements).

    Cowardly white ethno-nationalists.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Now the nignorant angry little black fella is confusing politeness with cowardice.

      • Jeffery says:

        So Con Men limit their use of “nigger” amongst the like-“minded”, and in private, so as not to offend Black men. LOL. Stop digging…

  14. Jeffery says:

    LOL. Devo Nunez, tRump’s “buttboy” in the House, says nothing to see here! Mr. Robert Mueller III will let little Devo know when the investigation is over.

  15. Jeffery says:

    Years ago, cowardly peckerwoods could call a Black man “nigger” without repercussion. Nowadays they get their cowardly pussy asses handed to them.

    • Some Hillbilly in St Louis says:

      Cracker is a reference to Scots-Irish from Britain and from the south – not terribly insulting unless you’re familiar with the race. Peckerwood is a reference to rural white trash in the SoCal penal system, again not terribly offensive unless your familiar with them. Honky is a reference to white men that would go to black neighborhoods and honk to summon the black whores – comical, but not too insulting. None of those things are terribly insulting.

      However, the white nationalist pap that you fart out of your cock-holster would get all of your teeth fed to you. Stick to the nazi/kkk/white nationalist insults, they are the only ones that have any chance of insulting a white fellow. Be sure to work it into a conversation with any white fellow that you run into. Tell us how it turns out for you.

      • Jeffery says:

        Will do. White nationalist is a description, not an insult. Peckerwood and tRumpitista are insults.

        You’re telling me that a tiki torch marcher with a swastika tattoo, chanting “Jews Won’t Replace Us” would become violent if referred to a white nationalist? Do you consider yourself a white nationalist? You seem to be getting increasingly violent, talking about shooting Americans and knocking teeth out. Is that working for you?

        White Nationalism: an ideology that advocates a racial definition of national identity. These individuals identify and are attached to the perceived white nation. It ranges from a preference for one’s ethnic group, to feelings of superiority and forms of white supremacism.

        Granted, many supporters of varying degrees of white nationalism dislike being identified as such, so they like to keep it quiet and elect men who do their bidding, like Don Juan tRump.

      • Jeffery says:

        I was born and raised in the Missouri Ozarks, so am proudly a liberal hillbilly.

  16. Jeffery says:

    Betsy DeVos said that schools get better when better students transfer out and cut the funding. This is what passes for thought in Con Man circles, these days. Oh well, they believe tax cuts for the rich increase tax revenues. Cult.

  17. Jl says:

    “Contrived conditions of a greenhouse”. That’s funny-contrived. In other words, a perfect setting to see that CO2 causes plant growth because as said, the only variable is the CO2. But J, if you’d like to link to papers that purport to show that isn’t the case, by all means do so.
    “Years ago, cowardly peckerwods would call a black man “ nigger” without repercussion.” Yes, and those would have been southern democrats.

  18. Jl says:

    As far as the warming, here for J’s viewing pleasure is the often quoted paper, (amongst others) that talk about the temperature record. The redundancy is required for J…https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf

    • drowningpuppies says:

      The angry little black fella is too lazy or too nignorant to read that.

    • Jeffery says:

      And in what peer-reviewed journal was this published? Deniers put words to paper all the time to support their silly notions. That doesn’t mean the results are true.

      “Years ago, cowardly peckerwoods would call a black man “ nigger” without repercussion.” Yes, and those would have been southern democrats.

      Those would have been southern conservatives. All the Con Men moved to the GOP when the Dems decided to support civil rights. There are few classic liberals remaining in the today’s GOP.

      • JGlanton says:

        LOL! Revisionist history to support the Dem narrative. Everybody knows which party supported civil rights and which didn’t.

        • Jeffery says:

          And we know which movement supported civil rights and which movement didn’t. The Dems used to be the party of conservative white supremacy and racism. Now it’s the GOP.

          It’s just the truth.

  19. Jl says:

    Yes, it would ruin the narrative. “Do you think infrared radiation….”? Sure:https://realclimatescience.com/2015/11/nasa-has-known-since-1971-that-co2-is-not-dangerous-yet-lied-to-the-public-continuously/

  20. Jl says:

    . “And we know which movement supported civil rights…”. That would have been the Republicans, J, as the Democrats were the ones who filibustered the Civil Rights Bill.

Pirate's Cove