Woman Who Accused Trump Of Rape Quietly Drops Lawsuit

Democrats have been crowing about how Donald Trump was going to have to go to court after the election, positioning a federal lawsuit as a criminal case, thinking that it could land him in jail. Neither is going to happen

(Politico) A woman who accused Donald Trump of raping her two decades ago when she was a 13-year-old aspiring teen model has again dropped a federal lawsuit over the alleged assaults.

The accuser, identified in the lawsuit by the pseudonym “Jane Doe,” was expected to appear at a news conference in Los Angeles Wednesday, but that appearance was abruptly canceled.

In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings

Here’s my problem with this case and all the other allegations: none seemed to have gone to the police. None seemed to have filed charges against Trump. Then, suddenly, decades later, they come up with allegations.

The accuser’s lead attorney, Thomas Meagher of New Jersey, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. He filed a one-page notice dismissing the case Friday evening in federal court in Manhattan. No explanation was given for the action.

The UK Daily Mail notes in an article that names her and has her picture

She claimed her motivation to tell her story was to expose Donald Trump to stop him from becoming president.

‘We would have a rapist in the White House. I would feel horrified every single day if I stay in this country,’ she said, in dramatic terms.

Sounds more like she’s just trying to stop Trump. As for a rapist in the White House, that’s what you get if Hillary is elected.

But she also said that in 1994 she had no idea who her attacker was and that it was only when she watched The Apprentice that she came to believe it was Trump, claiming that she could not forget her attacker’s face.

So, zero proof. It could very well be that Epstein raped/sexually assaulted her, because he is a scumbag who’s been under investigation for luring underage girls and served time for soliciting prostitution.

Oh, and Epstein has lots of links to Bill and Hillary Clinton. Huh.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Woman Who Accused Trump Of Rape Quietly Drops Lawsuit”

  1. Liam Thomas says:

    Everyone knew this was about money….the woman was practically living on the streets….Im sure the Donald quietly paid her off…..thats what rich people do…..

    Just like the Clintons pay off or bump off anyone in their political way…….

    Its called settling out of court…..Its what 99 percent of all civil action suits manage to get settled.

    As for Trump U…..Like the Trump tower in toronto….Trump didnt have anything to do with it….he collected money, used his name and let others run it and take care of it.

    Again another lawsuit that corporations have to face almost daily much like Exxon, GE, Kraft, Target….name your company.

    thats why they have an army of lawyers…Lawyers just love suing each other so they can keep their brotherhood alive.

  2. Liam Thomas says:

    She claimed her motivation to tell her story was to expose Donald Trump to stop him from becoming president.

    Perhaps the Clintons paid her off the more I think about it…..You only need to make the accusation….

    its like a man anytime sex is involved he is always guilty until proven innocent even though it becomes pretty hard in many cases to prove it…he is still guilty in the eyes of public opinion until proven otherwise.

    Same with child molestation…OMG a man is 100 percent guilty and it takes the intervention of GOD himself to not be throw in jail for 40 years.

    Yeah I get protecting children totally but Im just saying that to make a point…..

    The accusations were all that was needed….PROOF? Nah….the Clintons are the worlds best at smearing without being seen as smearers…..Congrats HRC….

  3. Liam Thomas says:

    And finally because Trump lacks a ground game…..I do think the polls are accurate…I think HRC eeks out a win….Had trump flipped those polls red….then trump could win it.

    No ground game equals a defeat november 8th….

    And why he spent so much time in PA, MI, Wi and MN is mindboggling….those states show him by a lot…and PA will just have Philly print up however many votes he needs to win PA….thats why the Black panthers prowl the precints in that city.

    Co, NC, NH and FL were where he should have a million get out the vote troops walking and canvassing….he should have put 25 million into those 4 states while continuing to nurture OH…….

    He didnt because TRUMP cant stand to lose….so he in his demented dreams thinks he can flip rock solid Democratic states because he is T R U M P.

    Bad mistake…hes even got Huckabee believing hes going to win plus 10 point polled blue states…….sad.

  4. Liam Thomas says:

    Dont get me wrong he can still win this thing but hes got to win Romneys states which he most likely will…then hes got to get FL OH NC and NH and the one district in Maine for one vote….He has flipped Iowa I believe and will win Arizona…….Nevada he can win…if he doesnt if he gets the others he still prez..

    My predictions……

    IF HE LOSES its 308-230 I believe he loses FLorida, NH, VA and Colorado and Nevada.

    IF HE WINS…its…273-265…He wins FLorida, NH, Ohio and Colorado but loses Nevada…remember nevada is a state in which Harry Reid was behind like 8 points and won on election day because of all the Unions working their magic for him there.

    This is why I personally say…. 5pm EST will tell us whats going on…thats when the press can start releasing exit polling data….

    Again I have to stress the ground game and the GOP establishment fear Trump as much as they do HRC…probably more so because were talking about THEIR JOBS…they got no dog in the Donalds fight….In fact it actually probably benefits them much more greatly personally if the Donald loses….

    And thats why so many republicans are mad….they think its about Obama and it is…they think its about HRC and it is…but its also about a GOP party that is all about the GOP entrenched heirarchy of wealth that doesnt care one bit about their base…..

    And thats why the lefties on the fence should be voting for Trump because electing HRC will just further entrench the left into that suppression machine that actively worked against Bernie Sanders because he was………AN OUTSIDER wanting change.

  5. Jeffery says:

    from the very Trump-friendly article:

    She described a sordid role play in which her and another underage girl were dressed as maids and she claims they were forced to ‘make out’ with each other.
    She alleges Trump – or the man she claims was Trump – entered the room and feigned surprise at seeing the two girls.
     ‘She told me it was a role play but she didn’t tell me what kind until I got there. And so I’m freaking out, I’m like, so you want to tie me to a bed and play out a rape scene with a man.
    Johnson said: ‘Maria was around the same age as me, it was pretty obvious. I felt she was going through the same thing as me, in that she was being forced to be there somehow.
    ‘So we cleaned and then very clumsily kissed and Trump caught us making out on the job as part of the role play.’
    She claims ‘Trump’ ordered the two girls to carry out a string of sex acts on each other and on him.
    ‘Again he finished and said we both could have done it better and then left. We never saw him again that night.’
    She  added: ‘At that point, after these three encounters, the type of man he was, I thought that he was a creepy guy, a molester who wanted sex with these girls. He’s older than my dad, I felt like he was evil, I was scared of him.’

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3894806/Woman-alleged-raped-Donald-Trump-13-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-DROPS-case-casting-doubt-truth-claims.html#ixzz4P8PZ6bEz
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  6. Liam Thomas says:

    and then she drops the case………..All you have to do is make the accusation…the rest takes care of itself as you now are trying to try and convict trump without evidence…..

    Right…Just like 650,000 emails and wiki leaks dumps are not evidence of HRC guilt or the facts that 5 field offices are investigating HRC’s charity including the IRS… But HER personal account corroborated by ONE PERSON is evidence….

    so strong was the evidence SHE dropped the case…..Here is one thing I know….Everything a liberal thinks they believe in is a lie….They spend their lives looking for the bad in everything….they obsess with inequality while doing nothing about it….they profess their undying support for the inner cities and let them rot…….they screech racist language while blaming the KKK for being racist and then baiting and switching every conservative in America as a member of the KKK.

    Evidence….who needs evidence anyway Jeffery…with a Democratic DOJ….nothing will happen….or if it does…it will be because some on the left actually have a conscience and are honest people who feel they are there to serve America….not the democratic party……

    Evidence….we could have a mountain of it…which we do….and the leftist DOJ will just claim its politics and call the right racists or mysogynists for daring to go after HRC.

  7. Liam Thomas says:

    * RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

    James Comey. Deflect the attention off HRC onto Comey….Its all Comeys fault that HRC broke the law.

    Here is one that no one has even been talking about.

    All in a day’s work according to Obama who took advice and training from Saul Alinsky.

    How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky

    There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.

    1) Healthcare
    Control healthcare and you control the people

    2) Poverty
    Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

    3) Debt
    Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

    4) Gun Control
    Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

    5) Welfare
    Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)

    6) Education
    Take control of what people read and listen to � take control of what children learn in school.

    7) Religion
    Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools

    8) Class Warfare
    Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

    Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States ?

    This was actually written and preached by Saul Alinsky.

  8. Liam Thomas says:

    Ever wonder what Jeffery and John preach here everyday….just read the above…..Saul Alinsky at its finest…Its the lefts blueprint for the subjugation of america….for turning a superpower into a super cesspool of poverty…..for taking the most productive nation on earth and turning it into a welfare state of lazy people collecting a check…..

  9. Liam Thomas says:

    Ever wonder why deficits DONT MATTER TO THE LEFT? They want to run up deficits….FREE COLLEGE…paid for by ever increasing DEBT……

    There is no free lunch…except in Saul Alinsky’s plan to socialize America….once that is done….whose gonna pay for it. England is fed up….a majority has voted to leave the socialist EU because they demand that England continue to pile on debt, welfare and they do this with massive influx of immigrants who just take up more and more and more resources.

    Why does the left really want open borders? To make America poor.. the more unproductive people fleeing into our states the more burden until there is nothing left to do but raise taxes and then that by its nature further reduces the nations ability to be productive putting more people on the dole….

    When your depend on the government to be fed….its hard to vote against the government……..Just look at Venezuela……after years of dancing in the streets shouting hallelujah at socialist wonderful offerings they are now rioting in the streets because the government cant feed them anymore….and a nation that was wallowing in 150/bbl oil is now langusihing in 40/bbl oil and on the brink of full blown anarchy.

    Ive spent decades mostly in South America working….I know that continent very well….and its on the brink of mass extinction. Brazil is next IMO.

  10. Jeffery says:

    Actually, according to Dick Cheney it was Ronald Reagan who proved that deficits didn’t matter.

    The only time the national debt was higher than now was just after WWII, where we wiped out the Nazis and the Japanese military machine. Was that a good use of borrowing?

    After WWII did we slash government spending and cut the taxes of the wealthy to stimulate the economy? Nope. We RAISED taxes and spent even more building the American middle class. Have you heard of the GI Bill?

    Yearly deficits result from taking in less money than we spend. You can eliminate deficits by taking in more money or spending less, or a combination of both. Conservatives make the unsubstantiated claim that cutting taxes of the wealthy and corporations will result in more income.

    Americans have always depended on the government “to be fed” to a certain extent. Every job in America has a component that is dependent on or facilitated by government action. Most people drive to work on government-facilited roads, fly through government subsidized airports, were trained in government subsidized schools, protected by government employees, drink water and eat food that is generally safe… cars are safer, water purer, air cleaner. Even our corporations are government protected entities. Government promotes business, sponsoring or conducting much of the research that private business finds too risky, including biomedical research, space exploration, renewable energy and other energy research.

    Of course when conservatives worry about the government feeding people, they picture Black people, who according to cons are naturally lazy. Do you have any idea how much we spend each year feeding people?

    Liberals actually wish everyone was rich! Conservatives are afraid if the poor become well off it can only be at the expense of the wealthy donor class. Conservative elites thrive in the current caste system. The donor class has rigged the system (both Repubs and Dems) to continually enrich themselves at the expense of the working classes. Taxation, labor law, trade policies, immigration policy, patent and copyright law, contract law all add up to benefit the ruling class.

    The time was right for a Republican demagogue to recruit working class white men with tales of Negroes and Mexicans taking all the good jobs because of government set-asides. The meme has been brewing for decades.

  11. Jeffery says:


    If the government spends $1 trillion on infrastructure upgrades – roads, bridges, public schools, internet, energy grid etc… who gets paid?

    If we can borrow money at near 1% and pay it back over 30 years why wouldn’t we?

  12. Rev.Hoagie® says:

    If we can borrow money at near 1% and pay it back over 30 years why wouldn’t we?

    National debt is not a 30 year mortgage, dumbass, it’s 2,3 and 5 year bonds. As they renew, they will most likely increase. Why don’t you stick to casting illegal votes and leave finance to the grown ups.

  13. Jeffery says:

    Rev Dumbass,

    So? Our debt payments stay at a tiny fraction of GDP.

  14. Jeffery says:

    Bush Conservative Michael Gerson on Trump:

    His political theory, such as it is, is “us” vs. “them.” The “them” may be Republican elites, or liberal elites, or migrants or Mexicans or Muslims. Trump would be elected on the promise of fighting, rounding up, jailing or humbling any number of personal and political opponents. Take away this appeal, and there is nothing left but grasping, pathetic vanity.

    The undercurrents of economic anxiety and cultural disorientation that Trump exploits are real, deserving both attention and sympathy. But Trump has organized these resentments with an unprecedented message: The United States is weak and broken, a hell of crime, terrorism and expanding misery, beset from within and without, and now in need of a strong hand — his strong hand — to turn things around.

    The single most frightening, anti-democratic phrase of modern presidential history came in Trump’s convention speech: “I alone can fix it.” A Trump victory would be a mandate for authoritarian politics. Trump’s ambitions would be bounded by strong legislative and legal institutions and by his own risible ignorance of real leadership. But a Trump administration would be a concession to the idea that America needs a little more China, a little more Russia, a little more “so let it be written, so let it be done” in its executive branch.

    I never imagined that Republican leaders — many of whom I know and have respected — would fall in line with such dangerous delusions, on the theory that anything is better than Hillary Clinton. Most options are better than Clinton. But not all. And not this.

  15. john says:

    she said she was in fear of her life. Maybe from trump’s mafia buddies.

Pirate's Cove