Post-Hillary Email Decision, Trump Takes On….Frozen

The Hillary email scandal decision was laid out perfectly by FBI Director James Comey for Donald Trump to use to beat Hillary. While Comey said he would not recommend charges, he spent three-fourths of his televised comment saying exactly how she did wrong and broke the law. Trump could have pounded Hillary using those comments, and continued to beat on how the system is rigged. At the NY Times, one letter writer noted

Forget the election. Forget conservatives versus liberals. Forget the theater that is Trump versus Clinton. What saddens and disgusts me about the decision not to take some formal disciplinary action against Hillary Clinton for her blatant disregard for the rules that are meant to protect our country and its citizens is the duplicity of it all.

What this says is that there is one set of laws for people in power, like the Clintons, and another set for us “rank and file” citizens. Many federal employees have been disciplined and prosecuted for less negligence with classified material than Mrs. Clinton exhibited.

Our country should mourn this decision, not based on our political stripes, but because it signals a very public decree that we are no longer equal in the eyes of the law.

People have been charged with much less. And there does seem to be a double standard on how some people are treated in the legal system. So, Trump could have expounded on this. But, after a brief statement and video, here’s where Trump is going

Yup. Frozen

(Yahoo) Trump was seemingly arguing that the Disney star showed that his latest Twitter controversy was overblown and that the image was, as he said in a speech Wednesday, “just a star.” On Saturday, Trump tweeted an image of Hillary Clinton, a pile of money and the six-pointed star, which is a symbol of Judaism. The text inside the star read: “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever!”

The tweet was criticized by both Democrats and Republicans for its anti-Semitic overtones. Trump deleted the tweet within hours and replaced the star with a red circle.

Though the image reportedly originated with an anti-Semitic Twitter account and was featured on a white nationalist site, Trump later said the star he used was a “Sheriff’s Star” or a “plain star” — and not the Star of David.

He’s also yammering about this in speeches. And, he yammered about Saddam Hussein being good at killing terrorists. If, by terrorists, Trump means Saddam enemies, like the Kurds, because Saddam sponsored terrorists to go blow themselves up in Israel, allowed terrorist training camps inside the border, and even had hardcore Al Qaeda member Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as a guest.

The Lonely Conservative is constantly wondering if Trump really wants to win. Blowing off tailor made issues for stupid things sure doesn’t help.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Post-Hillary Email Decision, Trump Takes On….Frozen”

  1. Liam Thomas says:

    Trump is a billionaire….hes got his meathooks buried so deeply in the Pimp Daddy and Hooker that is the clintons that he stands more to gain IF THEY WIN then if they lose.

    As he FLIPPANTLY said in the FIRST DEBATE when he never expected any of this to happen…..I gave hillary money and I expect her to pay up when I come calling.

  2. Jeffery says:

    It’s difficult to divine what the man-baby Trump really wants. While all presidential candidates are arrogant and self-centered Trump takes it to a new level. He craves attention – actually he craves adoration and subservience – so it’s likely he would love the attention and approval reflected in winning the election but have little interest in governing. He’s obviously unfit to be President, he just wants everyone to love him.

  3. Odysseus says:

    Am I the only one wondering if the there is a hypocrisy of Trump criticizing Clinton for getting special treatment from the law that is too much for even Donald to swallow?

  4. John says:

    Teach the biggest supporter of Islamic terrorists have always been the Saudis and the Gulf sheiks
    These are our allies who you were happy to defend from the dangers of Saddam
    When al Zarqawi was his “guest” he was under their control after Saddam was deposed Zarqawi was out of control and ever since Iraq has become a huge recruiting office for terrorists
    They flicked there from all over which of course was bin Laden’s stated reason for 9/11
    He wanted us to invade and occupy Muslim countries
    Muslims are sort of like Americans, no they don’t really like being killed by their own
    BUT they absolutely can’t stand being killed by “others”
    We can tolerate 15000 being killed by other Americans but if 100 of us are killed by “terrorists” well by golly we aren’t going to stand for THAT!!
    And that is

  5. david7134 says:

    Having watched the questioning of the FBI chief, I came away with the idea that if you do not intend to break the law, then you haven’t. So, if I go into a bank with a gun (legal in my state) and have a mask on to protect me from the sun and say I want the money, actually meaning mine. Then I did not intend to rob the bank. This Clinton thing stinks so bad that it hurt, yet we see our resident liberals can not understand the issues at all. What really was amazing was that the black members on the committee were defending old lady Clinton. Yet this is a glaring example of white privilege. So, they were defending a woman who is getting away with activity that would have put them in jail for 10 years.

  6. Jeffery says:

    Hello Racist!

    You typed:

    What really was amazing was that the black members on the committee were defending old lady Clinton. Yet this is a glaring example of white privilege. So, they were defending a woman who is getting away with activity that would have put them in jail for 10 years.

    Now, now. Condeleeza Rice and Colin Powell, both Black, also got away with the same activity, with not only no jail time, but not even a politically driven “investigation”.

    Anyway, Comey said there was no evidence Clinton broke the law, nor did she lie to investigators. This was a political action all along. So why do you want her in prison again? For being a woman daring to run for president, right?

  7. drowningpuppies says:

    Condeleeza Rice and Colin Powell, both Black, also got away with the same activity…

    Err, no.

    –that little guy who exaggerates often being dishonest again.

  8. Hoagie says:

    I don’t think Jeffery likes black people. Racist! I denounce you!

  9. Teapartyguardian says:

    Wow, Trump has turned the election season upside-down. Killary didn’t help with her lying, cheating, irresponsible handling and selling of secrets. But, I think we can all agree, another round of Progressive bullshit like owebama and killary would be bad for everyone in America. Even the welfare mooche’s and illegals will suffer when America collapses under the disease of Progressivism.

Bad Behavior has blocked 9481 access attempts in the last 7 days.