Surprise: Deal Would Eliminate Inspection Of Iranian Nuclear Sites

Trust but verify cross your fingers

(Israel National News) The P5+1 countries led by the United States under Barack Obama have caved in to Iranian demands and will not insist on inspections of nuclear installations as part of a deal on Iran;s nuclear weapons program, Channel 1 reported Sunday.

The channel’s Arab affairs correspondent reported that the June 30 – Tuesday night – deadline for the talks has been set back to an unspecified date but that the negotiations are good natured and the feeling is that the deal is nearly done.

Capitulation to a hardcore Islamist regime, hell bent on developing nuclear weapons and controlling the Middle East.

Obama wanted a deal no matter what, no matter how bad it is for the West and Israel, so he could say “I got a deal!” The terms have been dictated by the Iranians, and the only country that had held tough was France (think on that one!). If there are to be no inspections, what, exactly, is the point of any deal?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Surprise: Deal Would Eliminate Inspection Of Iranian Nuclear Sites”

  1. Liam Thomas says:

    Back when Hitler/Goebles/Goehring et. al were running the United States and invadin Afghanistan and Iraq and there was talk of invading Iran….the progressive left went absolutely bat shit crazy.

    As a result they took Iran upon their backs and made it a cause. Not that it was necessarily a plank in their platform but it was a roadblock to the nationalism they were so desperately trying to destroy.

    to wit:

    The editor of the uber-liberal magazine The Progressive proudly wrote: “It’s July 4th, my least favorite holiday…You see, I don’t believe in patriotism.”

    As amazing as it might seem, the 27-year-old Matthew Rothschild :

    You can call me unpatriotic if you’d like, but really I’m anti-patriotic.

    I’ve been studying fascism lately, and there is one inescapable fact about it:

    Nationalism is the egg that hatches fascism.

    And patriotism is but the father of nationalism.

    Patriotism is not something to play with. It’s highly toxic. When ingested, it corrodes the rational faculties. […]

    Plus, it’s a war toy, wheeled out whenever a leader needs to improve his ratings by attacking some other country-often after invoking God’s name, too. […](see the reference here to invading IRAN?)

    But as for me, between God, country, and apple pie, I’ll take the apple pie.(Perfect little communist agenda…anti-god, anti-nationalism.)

    Essentially the progressive far left has made Iran a cause. A push Back against nationalism, and the conservative movement and all things mom and apple pie.(No I am not for invading Iran….In fact I was opposed to invading Afghanistan and Iraq as well….I could see another Vietnam when they started talking about turning an anti-democratic culture into a democratic nation.)

    They are willing to make a deal with anything or anyone to get this deal done. They want Iran to have Nukes for the very reason that Israel has nukes given to them by the USA back in the 60’s. Weapons so old now that no one is even sure they would work anymore.

    So the reason that obama has lost his freakin mind over Iran is because the huge progressive base demands it….they demand a deal and the manchurian candidate must deliver before his term ends.

    and no I do not fear the constitution being rewritten to allow Obama more time in office….the puppet masters of the left would lose power.

  2. Liam Thomas says:

    And if anyone thinks that Bush was not repeatedly called a nazi and Hitler during his time in office as the progressive left threw out all stops to destroy nationalism…….

    Then let me remind you…..and this is why iran is a must win for the progressive left……its a slap in the face of the most hated man in the world by the progressive left.

  3. john says:

    And if anyone thinks that Obama was not repeatedly called a nazi and Hitler during his time in office as the reactionary right threw out all stops to destroy his presidency….

    Then let me remind you…..and this is why iran is a must win for the reactionary right……its a slap in the face of the man overwhelmingly re-elected by the people of the United States by the reactionary right

    Teach is Israel spying on the USA and then leaking material that could undermine the negotiations? In all probability the no inspection clause will refer only to military bases where little if any R&D is done. Just as in the USa that is not done on military bases. Of course Iran realizes that it is much easier politically for the USA to attack a military base they choose to do their research elsewhere
    All of the previous chiefs of noth military and civilian intelligence in Israel have said that any deal with Iran is better than no deal. If no deal in Iran is reached than the Iranian hard liners will have won. The Iranian hard liners want NO DEAL, apparently just like tou !

  4. Liam Thomas says:

    And if anyone thinks that Obama was not repeatedly called a nazi and Hitler during his time in office as the reactionary right threw out all stops to destroy his presidency….

    I told jeffery if you look long enough you can find someone that says what you want them to say.

    there is no doubt that in reaction to nearly 5 years of Bush is Hitler including march after march after march in which I linked…that some on the right would resort to the same tactic.

    But lets compare marches…..Tea Party vs Anti-war…

    I have already shown you anti-war marches.

    Some tea party rally links………and surely there would be anxious progressives hoping to find those ugly signs to show the world the right was just as unhinged as they were.

    sorry John I have tried and im sure you can find an isolated instance of the tea party with a nazi sign…I remember the tea party actually running off any protestor with a Nazi sign or a kkk sign or any inflamatory sign.

    Obama is a socialist….most likely a manchurian communist but he is not Hitler….Nor was Bush…..

    However the treatment afforded bush by the unhinged left vs the treatment afford obama vs the unhinged right is night and day……..

    once again you do a poor job of even trolling this site. You do no research you just simply throw stuff out and hope it gains traction…….

  5. Liam Thomas says:;_ylt=AwrT6VvxUpFV.V8AtMInnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTEzOWlpMXBsBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDRkZHRTAyXzEEc2VjA3Nj?p=Tea+Party+Town+Hall+Protest&fr=yhs-mozilla-001&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-001

    We can see these violent anti-Obama radicals calling Obama a Nazi non stop.

    I suppose if you find one sign it validates your post but where you can find 1 or 2 or 10….I can find 1000’s upon 1000’s of Bush is HITLER posters in march after march after march.

  6. john says:

    The Iranians bought nost of their early nuclear knowledge from Pakistan. Reagan allowed Pakistan to develope the bomb because he needed their help in arming the radical islamists to fight Russia in Afghanistan. Say how is that working out now that the Russians have left the mess of that country?

  7. Liam Thomas says:

    JFK was the first into Vietnam…..LBJ radically escalated it and then quit leaving the war to Nixon who was seen as a war monger trying to end the war.

    Jimmy Carter was the first to begin arming the Muslims in Afghanistan against Russia.

    When Reagan took office he continued the policy.

    BUSH invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. He surged in Iraq. When Obama took office he continued Bush’s patriot act and began flying drones into peoples houses around the world and SURGED in Afghanistan….

    It is rarely one presidents fault.

    Obamacare……yeah thats On Obama….giving Nukes to IRAN…yeah thats on Obama…..

    Now your trying to say that Obama is giving Iran nukes because of?….Hell they are the ones destablilizing the entire middle east and want to nuke Israel and probably will the minute they have a bomb ready to go…….

    No this ones on Obama….you can’t blame Reagan or Bush or carter or Clinton……Everyone of those presidents were vehemently opposed to Iran’s radical regime…..

  8. Liam Thomas says:

    Say how is that working out now that the Russians have left the mess of that country?

    And Just how do you think it will work out for anyone when Iran has nukes? Anyone that thinks thats a positive is a lunatic.

  9. Jeffery says:

    Does Israel allow the rest of the world to inspect their defense systems? How about their nuclear facilities?

    The alternative to a nuclear deal with Iran is war and continued radicalization of Iran.

    The benefits of a deal with Iran is an unleashing of their young and idealistic and moderate society, help against ISIS and no continuous war with Iran.

    What’s your solution?

Pirate's Cove