Bummer: Trump EPA Looks To Remove Greenhouse Gas Limits On Power Plants

I’ll say again that I am no fan of coal, because it does create dirty air and despoils the land. But, CO2? Nah. The NY Times is very upset over this, despite none of them giving up their own use of what they call “dirty” energy

Documents Show E.P.A. Wants to Erase Greenhouse Gas Limits on Power Plants

climate cowThe Environmental Protection Agency has drafted a plan to eliminate all limits on greenhouse gases from coal and gas-fired power plants in the United States, according to internal agency documents reviewed by The New York Times.

In its proposed regulation, the agency argued that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from power plants that burn fossil fuels “do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution” or to climate change because they are a small and declining share of global emissions. Eliminating those emissions would have no meaningful effect on public health and welfare, the agency said.

But in the United States, the power sector was the second biggest source of greenhouse gases, behind transportation, according to the most recent data available on the E.P.A. website. And globally, power plants account for about 30 percent of the pollution that is driving climate change.

What will you do without power? Natural gas is cheap, abundant, affordable, and easy. The power plants have small footprints, unlike solar and wind. And provide a hell of a lot more power for the cost and footprint. Maybe if the Warmists would let us build nuclear power plants we could have what they call sustainable power.

The E.P.A. sent the draft to the White House for review on May 2. It could undergo changes before it is formally released and the public is given the opportunity to offer comments, likely in June.

The proposed regulation is part of a broader attack by the Trump administration on the established science that greenhouse gases threaten human health and the environment. Scientists have overwhelmingly concluded that carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases from the burning of oil, gas and coal are dangerously heating the planet.

It was once established science that the world was flat, that the Sun went around the Earth, and that witches floated.

The Trump administration is methodically uprooting policies aimed at curbing climate change, and the E.P.A. is at the epicenter of that effort. In recent weeks, Mr. Zeldin has shuttered offices responsible for regulating climate and air pollution, and has launched the repeal of more than two dozen regulations and policies.

I’m actually rather surprised that Trump and his folks are missing the opportunity to tell Warmists to practice what they preach. To give up their own use of fossil fuels and make their lives carbon neutral.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

14 Responses to “Bummer: Trump EPA Looks To Remove Greenhouse Gas Limits On Power Plants”

  1. Aliassmithsmith says:

    Most economists day that the levelizred cost of renewables is now less than the cost of natural gas. .
    Offshore wind cost is about 4 cents per kwh levelizred
    Natural gas about 6.5 cents per kwh
    Every year the cost for renewables goes down
    When discussing the footprint for natural gas does that include the gas lines to fuel it ? How do you feel about taking land from individuals for gas lines ?
    The most expensive power “currently” is nuclear
    Power generated by your formerly beloved coal Mr Teach is now less than 15% of total electric generated.

    • Jl says:

      And yet the countries with the highest energy prices by and large are the ones using the most renewables. Strange..

    • James Lewis says:

      levelizred

      Definition: Whatever the fuck I want it to mean.

    • TJ Jackson says:

      Strange renewables have put the German chemical, steel and auto industries out of business out of business. They have the British public screaming. In Spain it caused a national power failure because of its reliability. Its expensive, unreliable, and faulty. Only someone with Biden’s iQ would defend it.

  2. Dana says:

    The United States has the world’s fourth largest proven coal reserves, so it’s stupid to just leave it in the ground; that’s real wealth. But, at least right now, natural gas is less expensive than coal, and the percentage of sparktricity generated by burning coal has dropped significantly.

    Think how much we’d be able to better the lives of people in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania is we were to increase our use of coal!

  3. Christian Mountaineer says:

    Amen, Dana. God gave us these resources to use.

  4. Christian Mountaineer says:

    Amen, Dana. God gave us these resources to use.

  5. JGuy says:

    I am a retired Electrical Engineer that worked most of my life in Telecom but also spent time setting up power in buildings. The present power grid needs to be updated as most of it is too old, it can be affected by weather and in all areas cannot handle the future needs.

    This EPA change is needed across the country. More and more power is needed as higher data growth is in the future especially with the plans for AI. I do not want AI at all anywhere as it will not be good for people and it will take large amounts of energy to run.

    All power companies in the US need to stop with solar and wind turbines as they do not produce enough power for the amount of money and time of use. The companies need to go to Nuclear, Natural Gas, Coal, Hydroelectric, and Biomass.

    • James Lewis says:

      Me too.

      About 20 years, after just retiring, I decided to build a house that would survive when the grid went down and pay for its energy use by selling back.

      Don’t remember all the details but I went the full monte. Solar panels, battery room, batteries for 24 hours at 1/2 load, 7 days at full emergency, rectifiers/chargers, transfer switches, etc. At that time Dallas was big into buy back so the gave me the numbers I could epect.

      Then I did a ROI and it looked goooooooood…. Until I plugged in the EOL for the panels and the batteries……The panels went EOL at about 15 years…I don’t remember the batteries.

      Short answer. I could never break even.

      So if you want to be secure, do it. But it’s gonna cost.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Mr trump needs to instruct the energy companies to re-re-retrofit their plants to burn coal. Maybe he can put a tariff on U.S. producers of natural gas to make coal economic again.

      Make KY and WV great again! Air and water pollution (scam) are make-believe problems! We have 1000 years worth of coal but libs have mandated that we can’t use it!!

      • James Lewis says:

        ellie, educate yourself

        Scrubbers in coal-fired power plants are devices that remove sulfur dioxide (SO2) and other pollutants from the exhaust gases (flue gases) before they are released into the atmosphere. These pollution control systems, often referred to as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems, are crucial for reducing the harmful effects of power plant emissions, including acid rain and respiratory health issues.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          And what does one do with the tons of sulfur dioxide adsorbed by the “scrubbers”? And the mountains of coal ash?

          Trump EPA exempts dozens of coal plants from mercury and air toxics rules

          The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is exempting 47 companies from regulations to curb mercury and air toxics from their coal-fired plants, according to a list released by the agency this week.

          The Trump administration previously allowed coal plants to apply for exemptions from the Mercury and Air Toxics (MATS) Standards, which were strengthened by the Biden administration in 2024. The rule was implemented to reduce emissions of mercury and non-mercury metal pollution, such as nickel, arsenic and lead. These pollutants are known to cause significant health impacts including fatal heart attacks, cancer and developmental delays in children.

          The Trump admin has expressed concern that the tightened rule creates an undue burden on certain coal-fired plants, at a time when electricity demand is soaring because of data centers, electric vehicles and manufacturing. Earlier this month, Trump signed a series of executive orders aimed at boosting the coal industry.

          Perhaps all the toxic coal ash can be shipped to the states where the coal is mined. West Virginia, Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove