We’ve already seen several hyper-left wing judges attempt to rule that immigration enforcement cannot arrest illegal aliens in courthouses, schools, daycare centers (they weren’t), churches, and so many other “sensitive” place. How soon till some wacko judge says ICE cannot arrest illegals in the streets?
ICE shift in tactics leads to soaring number of at-large arrests, data shows
The Trump administration’s mass deportation campaign has led to a significant change in strategy, as federal officers shift away from focusing on arresting immigrants already held in local jails to tracking them down on the streets and in communities, according to a Washington Post analysis of government data.
The result has been a huge surge of such at-large arrests, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement tallying about 17,500 in September and on pace to exceed that in October. (The data The Post examined had been updated through the middle of that month.) That was far more than any other month included in the data, which dated back to October 2011.
The Post’s analysis highlights a broader pattern in how the Department of Homeland Security is approaching enforcement, even as authorities insist that immigration officers are focusing on violent criminals whom they describe as “the worst of the worst.” Government data shows that more than 60 percent of the people detained in at-large arrests since June did not have criminal convictions or pending charges.
So, you mean that 40% are bad people, and the rest got scooped up because they were known illegal aliens? Cool!
Many local jails flag undocumented immigrants for removal and contact ICE directly. ICE also has the authority to monitor local arrests through a fingerprint-sharing program. The agency often files a detainer requesting that jails hold potential deportees for up to 48 hours for federal officers to take custody.
By comparison, at-large arrests typically require more human and financial resources to carry out, immigration experts said. ICE’s website says that such arrests “are unpredictable and can be dangerous to the public.”
So, wouldn’t it make more sense for all those sanctuary jurisdictions, which tend to have higher, denser populations and lots of illegals, to cooperate with ICE, therefore taking the bad folks away and keeping ICE busy doing that, meaning less time to go after the little angels (who are breaking 8 U.S. Code § 1325?
Ronald Reagan said he believed in amnesty for immigrants here for years who built an American life, even if their entrance was illegal. But then, Reagan, for all his flaws, believed in American greatness.
Mr Elwood P Dowd told us:
President Reagan offered amnesty for the illegals, along with increased border security to reduce the flow of new illegals into our country. Why? Because he could not wrap his head around a solution to the illegals already here.
This is part of the brilliance of Donald Trump. He knew it would be hard, and resisted by the loonies on the left, but he saw the solution to the illegals already here, was not to reward their lawbreaking with amnesty, but to do what the law already prescribes, and that’s to round them up and kick them out!
Why the difference? Mr Reagan was a nice guy, as most of our Presidents have been, while Mr Trump is an absolute [insert slang term for the anus here]. But President Trump’s base realizes very well that sometimes you need an [insert slang term for the anus here] to get things done. We want an [insert slang term for the anus here] in the White House, to do what previous nice guys would not.
Of course, our good friends on the left kept screaming that “no one is above the law,” or at least they were were doing so when they wanted to imprison Mr Trump. Why should we not believe them as President Trump starts enforcing our immigration laws? You should be supporting this, and you are a hypocrite if you do not.
Dana appears to believe/feel that 1) all acts are equivalent, e.g., jaywalking and being present in the U.S. without permission are offenses as serious as the attempted violent overthrow of the U.S. government or sexual assault of minors and 2) that America requires periods of unConstitutional and un-Jesus-like assholery to return us to our 18th Century roots. The majority of Americans disagree with his assessment. But authoritarians believe as he does.
Dana purports to being a Catholic, one of the christian cults, but doesn’t follow the teachings of Christ, making Dana a hypocrite.
Many of the ICE/DHS thugs break actual laws but the hypocritical MAGAts such as Dana stay quiet. Are all laws not equal?
The illegal immigrant excusing Mr Dowd wrote:
Perhaps our admitted atheist doesn’t know what the teachings of Jesus are. Jesus said, as documented in the Gospel according to John, Chapter 10, verse one:
While we welcome legal immigrants, our Lord himself has told us that those who sneak in are thieves and robbers. Is Mr Dowd telling us to welcome thieves and robbers?
Isn’t all law enforcement dependent upon “assholery”? Doesn’t all law enforcement depend upon apprehension and imposition of penalties, the taking of, at the very least, money, up to the taking away of someone’s rights, property, and freedoms?
Actually, your President and mine is trying to be slightly less of an [insert slang term for the anus here], by offering the illegals assistance in leaving voluntarily. It is, of course, less expensive for the country when they do leave voluntarily, but it’s about as merciful as we can be with regard to them having to leave.
Rimjob: Many of the ICE/DHS thugs break actual laws…
Do they? How many? Which laws?
Once again Rimjob parrots the talking points of advocacy groups without any actual evidence.
Rimjob wanna cracker?
Jeff piggy squealed while caked in mud despite trying to throw it: “Many of the ICE/DHS thugs break actual laws…”
Wishcasting. Meanwhile, ALL — as in EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE OF THEM — illegal aliens break actual laws, but the hypocritical piggy stays quiet.
Piggy wants you to forget that it is he who said, “No one is above the law” while he worships illegals, because the TV told him to.
Also piggy: “Dana purports to being a Catholic, one of the christian cults, but doesn’t follow the teachings of Christ, making Dana a hypocrite.”
Translation: “Hey man, if Jesus did exist he’d be leftist like me and even though I don’t believe in Him I just want to educate you on how a proper Christian should behave because I’m the expert.”
Why doesn’t the president with the huge gaping void where a soul should exist just kill the illegals like he does the purported drug runners?
Would you’uns object to that? Why or why not?
Well Rimjob let’s let AI respond…
In other words, you’re an ignorant fucking asshole.
Bwaha! Lolgfy Loser!
MAGA47 Motherfucker!
Dear MAGA Motherfucker,
WHY or why not? Donnie is killing dozens if not hundreds in boats – not even a threat to the U.S. – AND calls the millions of ‘illegals’ invaders – so why kill the boaters but not the invaders destroying America? Makes no sense.
Dear Ignorant Fucking Asshole,
Besides you have posed yet another stupid rhetorical question that doesn’t make sense therefore has no meaningful answer.
Bwaha! Lolgfy Rimjob!
MAGA47 Motherfucker!
The clearly agitated Mr Dowd wrote:
We’d simply apprehend the drug runners if they were using actual fishing boats that we could overtake and board. Blasting the high-speed boats is the equivalent of shooting a fleeing criminal, criminals who, in this case, would bring death upon our own citizens.
It is interesting that our avowed atheist is telling us that the greatest President of this century has a “huge gaping void where a soul should exist”. Is Mr Dowd telling us that he does have some religious beliefs? Inquiring minds want to know!
The self-satisfied Dana feels having the “soul of a human” exists only in christians. Conservative christians are the least soulful and least moral of humans.
LOL. So the U.S. military can’t catch the so-called drug boats so they have to kill the boaters?
Why don’t they kill the fleeing “illegals”?
The atheist piggy is now squealing about souls? How does a far-left atheist, who currently worships Somali Muslims but will go on to worship the next shiny object the TV puts in front of him, go about empirically proving the existence of the soul?