Surprise: House Democrats Want Taxpayer Funded Armed Security

Democrats are super happy to disarm you The People, keeping you from protecting yourself, but, for themselves

Democrats push for lawmakers to get armed security

As members of Congress grapple with growing personal threats, top Democrats in the US House are lobbying Republicans to let each lawmaker’s office employ an armed staff member to accompany them in their districts, as well as a law enforcement coordinator.

Rep. Joe Morelle of New York, the top Democrat on the committee in charge of member security, told Semafor that he and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have discussed pushing House Speaker Mike Johnson and committee chair Bryan Steil, R-Wis., for the additional hiring capacity.

Their push, which includes other priorities, comes as lawmakers gain access to a new $20,000 monthly personal security allowance starting Monday.

The law enforcement coordinator could “try to mitigate [threats] in advance and really do the prep work necessary,” Morelle said, while the armed staff member would be “someone who’s probably a former law enforcement, former military, who meets all the requirements of being able to carry a gun.”

Morelle placed “much of the blame” for the increase in threats to members — which he said have jumped tenfold since 2016 — on President Donald Trump, who most recently instructed the FBI to investigate six congressional Democrats who filmed a social media video telling military members not to follow illegal orders.

Perhaps they shouldn’t have broadcast a video telling service members to refuse orders they “feel” are illegal while blowing off the chain of command, all because they decided to die on the hill of caterwauling about strikes against foreign drug running boats.

Maybe Democrats should exercise their own 2nd Amendment right and carry a firearm.

Sure, Raphael isn’t carrying the gun himself, but, most private citizens cannot afford a private security guard following them around.

Weird, since her Islamist buds in Hamas, Hezbollah, and in Somalia all have guns. She’s not trying to take them away.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

13 Responses to “Surprise: House Democrats Want Taxpayer Funded Armed Security”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    It’s estimated that security for Big Don at Mar-a-Largo costs taxpayers $200,000-$300,000 PER DAY!!! And much of this gets funneled to Mar-a-Lardo!!

    The Palm Beach County sheriff’s office has requested reimbursement of $45 MILLION for security for Big Don.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Indiana Republicuns opposing Big Don redistricting there are receiving bomb threats and SWATting!

    “Trump and his allies have been waging a pressure campaign to convince Indiana Senate GOP holdouts to support the president’s move to redraw the state’s House map and create an aggressive map designed to be a 9-0 Republican advantage.”

    Just more MAGA “support” of Big Donnie rigged democracy.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5627929-indiana-gop-redistricting-battle/

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    The Death Throes of MAGA…

  4. Aliassmithsmith says:

    By the end of the year Trump will have deported 25000
    That is .02%
    At that rate in 3 more years he will have deported less than 1% of those “illegals”
    Tell me this is not theater for children

  5. BSmitty56 says:

    I wonder if they’ll let the National Guard troops carry in D.C.? It appeared some were unarmed when the shooting started last week. And the one soldier had to duck around the corner to chamber a round before shooting the bad guy. Were only the MPs armed? Another question our press never asked.

    • Professor Hale says:

      Great question. In the past 100 years or so, US politicians and generals have been terrified of US troops in American soil with live ammunition. A few incidents like Kent state shooting and the USMC gunner who shot a kid at the Mexican border reinforce that illogic.

      Troops deployed to Hurricane Sandy and Katrina had no ammunition but carried weapons anyway to “give the appearance of force”.

      After 9-11 when the National Guard were sent to patrol airports, they again went without ammunition, but put empty magazines in their weapons to conceal that fact.

      MPs generally have ammunition for their pistols, which are their duty weapons but do not have ammunition otherwise.

      Rabbit-like military commanders, fearful of someone getting shot and making them look bad, even if they do issue ammunition, will have restrictions on when the weapons can be loaded. Those same rabbit-like military officers often carry such restrictions into combat areas too.

      Finally, most military units do not even have enough ammunition to issue to all of their troops. This is particularly true of National guards. Active units normally have a bunker nearby from which they can issue small arms ammunition to units, but normally the amounts held in reserve are only what the units need throughout the year for training. The bureaucrats in the military have strict policy control about using training ammunition for operations.

      We can expect guard units deployed to city streets in America to be armed with pistols and ammunition, with no round in the chamber. Ammunition for rifles will be held back in a nearby vehicle and not even a full basic load. No ammunition for machine guns, grenades, or anything bigger. Most guardsmen will rely on safety in numbers to defend themselves from being robbed.

  6. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    William typed: “Maybe Democrats should exercise their own 2nd Amendment right and carry a firearm.”

    True. Unlike the current US president, most can legally carry a gun.

Leave a Reply to Elwood P. Dowd

Pirate's Cove