Bummer: NOAA To Stop Tracking Cost Of Weather Events

It is good to know what the costs of weather events is, though, it is skewed since there are so many more people and buildings in the way, and the property is more expensive. However, NOAA has been using those costs to push their climate cult beliefs

US will stop tracking the costs of extreme weather fueled by climate change

stop global warmingThe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will no longer track the cost of climate change-fueled weather disasters, including floods, heat waves, wildfires and more. It is the latest example of changes to the agency and the Trump administration limiting federal government resources on climate change.

NOAA falls under the U.S. Department of Commerce and is tasked with daily weather forecasts, severe storm warnings and climate monitoring. It is also parent to the National Weather Service.

The agency said its National Centers for Environmental Information would no longer update its Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters database beyond 2024, and that its information — going as far back as 1980 — would be archived.

For decades, it has tracked hundreds of major events across the country, including destructive hurricanes, hail storms, droughts and freezes that have totaled trillions of dollars in damage.

The AP shows exactly why this doomsday cult crap needs to end

Scientists say these weather events are becoming increasingly more frequent, costly and severe with climate change. Experts have attributed the growing intensity of recent debilitating heatHurricane Milton, the Southern California wildfires and blasts of cold to climate change.

Assessing the impact of weather events fueled by the planet’s warming is key as insurance premiums hike, particularly in communities more prone to flooding, storms and fires. Climate change has wrought havoc on the insurance industry, and homeowners are at risk of skyrocketing rates.

Except, not of that is actually true. Weather events are not becoming more frequent, a 1.7F increase in global temps in 175 years is no big deal, the SoCal wildfires were caused by human idiocy, and, wait, blasts of cold? Yeah, it’s a cult.

But, the constant bleating does freak out insurers, and, yeah, it is more costly, because things are more costly and there are more buildings.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

9 Responses to “Bummer: NOAA To Stop Tracking Cost Of Weather Events”

  1. alanstorm says:

    Translation:

    NOAA to stop cherry-picking scary data without context for scare-mongering purposes

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Translation: Don’t like the results, stop the analysis!!

    • Jeffery Keene of St. Louis says:

      Translation: Use only radical left wing and communist “experts” to do all analysis in the future. Just like the good old days pure

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Porter Good of Raleigh is so fucking stupid, LOL!!!

        Does he really believe scientists are communists? LOL.

        King-Pope Donald I and his MAGAts hate science and scientists. Why? Because science is apolitical and honest. Dictators need to control ALL the information, ALL the time. That’s why they are attacking universities, professors, scientists, teachers, and those that report the results! They are after medical and science journals for reporting data Donnie and the MAGAts find unsupportive of their ignorance. We don’t need no stinkin’ First Amendment!!

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Porter,

        We understand what you are doing, but it’s not working. You hope that your doxxing will scare me off. Here’s the deal. My sons know where you live and where you work, so if anything happens here you’ll “hear about it”.

        • drowningpuppies says:

          Well it is always about you, fatboy.

          Get over yourself, Rimjob.
          You’re really not that important. You’re worthless.

    • alanstorm says:

      No, dear, it’s simply not NOAA’s problem. They need to stick to science, not political propaganda.

      Try again.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Oh Stormy. Stop flirting with me, you old perv you! LOL. Not interested.

        King-Pope Donald I knows all you need to know and will suppress the rest.

  3. drowningpuppies says:

    It really is a mystery…

    On experts and economists who would have guessed?

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove