If you remember back, a couple of astrologers, er, scientists, modeled what they think happens with alien civilizations and how it leads to ‘climate change.’
Climate cultist Adam Frank: "my colleagues and I have just published a first study mapping out possible histories of alien planets, the civilizations they grow, and the climate change that follows" https://t.co/4bCN0MdFAd
— Tom Nelson (@TomANelson) May 30, 2018
This has led to lots and lots of articles on the subject since. Most of which were silly, and ignorable. Then we get this
DOES CLIMATE CHANGE EXPLAIN WHY WE DON’T SEE ANY ALIENS OUT THERE?
In the 1950s, famed physicist Enrico Fermi posed the question that encapsulated one of the toughest questions in the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI): “Where the heck is everybody?†What he meant was, given the age of the Universe (13.8 billion years), the sheer number of galaxies (between 1 and 2 trillion), and the overall number of planets, why has humanity still not found evidence of extra-terrestrial intelligence?
This question, which has come to be known as the “Fermi Paradoxâ€, is something scientists continue to ponder. In a new study, a team from the University of Rochester considered that perhaps Climate Change is the reason. Using a mathematical model based on the Anthropocene, they considered how civilizations and planet systems co-evolve and whether or not intelligent species are capable of living sustainability with their environment.
See? All the aliens killed themselves off because of carbon pollution! That’s why we don’t see them!
BTW, when it comes to aliens, can we really claim that 100% of all the reported encounters are fake?
