It Should Totally Not Be Allowed To Not Comply With Global Climate Pacts Or Something

Quite possibly one of the most cultish headlines from Warmists of all time

Adhering to global climate pacts should no longer be optional
With millions affected by soaring temperatures around the globe and forest fires ripping through continents as we speak, curbing industrial poison is anything but an abstract aspiration

And Warmists complain when I note that this is all about Progressive (nice fascist) politics rather than science.

Of course, the fire the article refers to is the one along the French Riviera. Sadly for these Warmist, officials suspect arson, not Hotcoldwetdry.

As whales continue to wash up on the world’s shores with piles of plastic in their stomachs, the issue is no longer a theory that we can optionally espouse as a worthy cause.

Confusing a real environmental issue with ‘climate change.’ What a shame, because plastics in the ocean is a real problem.

It is an urgent necessity and a race against a ticking time bomb. An industrial superpower like the United States leaving the Paris climate pact will have ramifications for the entire globe. As it turns out, countries are at the mercy of Mother Nature now. They can comply or, as we saw in recent weeks, face her wrath.

Weather never happened before, you know. Hence, all must be forced to comply.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

3 Responses to “It Should Totally Not Be Allowed To Not Comply With Global Climate Pacts Or Something”

  1. Jeffery says:

    Only the headline mentioned that the pacts not be optional.

  2. Oldav8r says:

    “..countries are at the mercy of Mother Nature now.” NEWSFLASH! The world has always been at the mercy of mother nature.

Pirate's Cove