I guess this means they will have more of Other People’s confiscated money flowing throw that they can treat as a slush fund
WHO is now a Green Climate Fund accredited entity
The World Health Organization (WHO) has today received accreditation by the Green Climate Fund (GCF), a fund for climate finance that was established within the framework of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The accreditation will unlock new funding to protect communities worldwide from the health impacts of climate change.
“Climate and health action saves lives,” said Dr Ruediger Krech, Director of the department of Environment, Climate Change, One Health and Migration at WHO, “Climate financing will ensure that the health sector is prepared to meet the demands of the climate crisis without contributing further emissions to climate change.”
This landmark decision is the result of extensive preparations including high-level exchanges between the Director General of WHO and the Executive Director of the GCF.
WHO has over 25 years of climate and health policy and technical leadership, and over 15 years of implementing climate and health programmes in over 30 countries. Extensive country presence and partnerships with ministries of health and governmental agencies position WHO as a vital partner in addressing global climate and health challenges. The combined strength of WHO and GCF will lead to direct climate and health programmes and the development of health-promoting interventions at the country level by leveraging a network of health ministries and key partners.
And what percentage of the money will never make it to the recipients/projects? I wonder if they will allow bi-yearly, unannounced audits?
According to estimates, just 2% of adaptation funding and only 0.5% of multilateral climate funding go to health, leaving the health sector with the greatest unmet demand. WHO aims to address these needs for climate finance support and empower national health ministries to develop climate-resilient health systems, reduce emissions and bolster climate-health action across sectors.
In other words, WHO wants its piece of the scam pie. Why should others get rich of siphoning the money, leaving WHO out of it till now?
Still another reason to cut off all funding of this international organization of racketeers.
U.S. out of the UN, and the UN out of the U.S.
Turn the building into Homeless Housing!
The 1000+ U.S. billionaires, e.g., trumpInc, Lutnick, Ellison, Bezos, Zuck, Elon, Adelson, Huang, Dell, Waltons, Page, Brin, Kochs, Schwarzman, Thiel, Murdochs, Kraft etc have been doubling their wealth lately.
Are THEY receiving these billions of scam money?? LOL.
The actual scam is that MAGAts keep denying that global warming is caused by We, The People, and is real.
Mr Teach calling global warming a scam is just propaganda. America pays lip service to the belief that a cornerstone of American justice is that those causing harm be held responsible. Who SHOULD pay for adapting to global warming? Adapting to hurricanes, wildfires, floods, diseases, heat waves, droughts, tornadoes… the seawalls, moving to higher ground, FEMA etc?
No, the actual scam is that it’s “from we the people” has never been verified. You’re like Johnny who kept repeating “permanent tax cuts for the elites!”, knowing it wasn’t true. Speaking of that a new paper, Cohler et al, 2026 alleges “IPCC’s Earth Energy Imbalance is Based on Physically Invalid Argo-Float-Based Estimates of Global Ocean Heat Content”.
“Adapting to hurricanes, wildfires, ect….”. You mean like we’ve always done?
Wow jl I am really impressed with your memory !:I can’t even remember the last time I said that. Can you refresh my memory ? When was it ? Have the tax breaks for billionaires somehow secretly ended ? If they do end,how will that affect you emotionally? Happy they are paying more? Or Sadz because they will not have money to trickle down on us?;
Cohler sees problems in data collection of ocean temps.
I have no problem with that.
How exactly does that affect the basis of the consensus (,generally accepted view) that the Earths temps are rising quickly ?
Cohler says those observations of ocean temps are/maybe inaccurate. OK. Disregard them. How does that change the data on observed air temps ?