Awesome: EPA Ditching Some Climate (scam) Rules

This is, quite frankly, one of the reasons the GOP needs to get its act together to make sure they win the White House in 2028, to make sure all these rollbacks of climate cult regulations and such are not reinstated

EPA announces rollback of climate pollution rules for power plants

The Environmental Protection Agency is repealing rules that curb greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The action, announced Monday at the G20 “Energy Abundance Ministerial” in Houston, eliminates limits set by the Biden administration in 2024.

“The Trump Administration has come in to protect American energy and to make sure you can afford to keep the lights on,” said EPA Administrator Zeldin, in a release. “Americans will see a decrease in electricity prices, but this is just the beginning.”

The rule change is the latest in a back-and-forth between Democratic and Republican administrations over whether or not to limit power plants’ greenhouse gas pollution, the main cause of climate change.

Power plants are the second largest sources of emissions in the U.S. behind transportation.

And, yet, all those climate cult states have not just ended their use of those power plants. It’s almost like the Warmists would rather have “dirty” energy that save the planet.

The Trump administration stressed the importance of coal and natural gas in powering the electric grid, which is seeing high demand from artificial intelligence and data center growth. Coal accounts for 16 percent of the country’s electricity, while natural gas accounts for 40 percent, according to federal data.

“During periods of peak electricity demand, coal and natural gas continue to play a critical role in keeping the lights on,” said Secretary of Energy Chris Wright. “Today’s announcement will help ensure reliable electricity generation.”

Look, I’m not a big fan of coal, it is dirty (not from CO2) and bad environmentally, but, the US needs energy. If Warmists would have let us start building next-gen nuclear power plants 20 years ago we’d be doing great!

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

12 Responses to “Awesome: EPA Ditching Some Climate (scam) Rules”

  1. Alias says:

    The cost of power generated from the last nuke that went on line is 2x as much as power from renewables. And will take 5 times as long to build. We do not yet even have designs for utility scale next gen designs. After that comes permits. Locals do not want them. No one is even willing to insure the construction bonds needed to begin construction. Last wind turbine construction took 3 years to finish and gives kwh equal to a nuke plant

    Globally renewables supply 32% of kwh.
    In the USA 25%, wind power greatest at night solar daytime

    Nukes are designed to last 40 years
    25cwere shit gown in less than 30 years. The avg age of an operating nuke USA is 44 years.

    • Jl says:

      And of that 32%, only 15% of the total is wind and solar. Hydropower is 15% of the total, with geothermal and biomass making up the remainder

      • Alias says:

        Solar generated power is expected to increase by 18% next year and wing by 8%
        This 25% increase per year of its 15% total energy contribution to double by 2035
        To 35%
        Basically all new electric power coming on line now is renewable wind and solarc

        • Jl says:

          Which means all that new renewable power needs to be backed up by fossil fuels, because renewables are intermittent.

        • Jl says:

          Johnny-basic math. A smaller number of to begin with will generate a larger percentage increase than beginning with a larger number. Example-there’s 1 solar plant, and then another one is built. That a 100% increase. There’s 50 coal plants, and 10 new ones are built. That’s a 20% increase.

  2. Dana says:

    I’m not certain how the wokesters who were running President Biden’s administration thought they could impose expensive new rules on electric power plants and concomitantly force more people into driving plug-in electric cars.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    By the grace of God we have 1000 years of clean king coal!! Let’s burn it and finally kill the myth of “dangerous” carbon dioxide, our most powerful plant food that the wokesters want locked away underground!!!

    We’ll finally drive a stake through the woke hearts of expensive solar, wind and nucular power.

    Sulfur and nitrogen oxides, arsenic, lead, mercury, and hexavalent chromium will be freed!

    Future generations will hail us for our wisdom and strength!!

  4. Dana says:

    Our esteemed host wrote:

    Look, I’m not a big fan of coal, it is dirty (not from CO2) and bad environmentally, but, the US needs energy.

    There is an abandoned rail line near our farm, something which reminds me constantly of all of the men who have lost their jobs mining coal in eastern Kentucky. Yeah, burning coal is dirtier than natural gas, but the closure of coal mines has truly impoverished eastern Kentucky, as well as West Virginia.

    There is a cost to everything, and the transition away from coal has had the cost of seriously degrading the economic health of the Appalachians.

  5. Professor Hale says:

    Real regulation like this needs to be debated in congress and passed by legislation. But congress is spineless (both parties). They all want to accept all the benefits of being in office and passing any sort of bill that gets attention will hurt their re-election chances. Spineless. They much prefer to let unelected bureaucrats decide all of the important issues of the day.

Pirate's Cove