“Experts Say” AC Saves Lives But Is Also Killing The Planet

I wonder if the same “Experts” have given up their own use of AC?

Keeping cool saves thousands of lives yearly, but at a cost of worsening global warming, experts say

(the original headline was “Experts say air conditioning saves many lives, but worsens climate change…”)

Cooling from air conditioning saves lives — more than 5,000 a year in the United States alone — but it also heats up the planet and taxes our electrical grid, scientists say.

As the world warms, heat waves strike nearly every continent and United Nations officials estimate that about half a million people die a year from heat, air conditioning is needed and being used more than ever. A study in Nature Health reported Monday that air conditioning saved nearly 58,000 lives between 2010 and 2020 in the U.S. Air conditioning use is skyrocketing around the world, with electricity demand from cooling expected to triple, according to the International Energy Agency and the United Nations Environment Programme.

It’s also more of a problem than ever. Because most of the electricity for cooling comes from the burning of fossil fuels, the U.N. projects the amount of heat-trapping gas spewed into the atmosphere from air conditioning use to rise from 4.5 billion to 7.2 billion tons in the next 25 years or so. That 7.2 billion tons is almost as much as the carbon pollution from the United States and Europe now.

Well, let us build nuclear power plants. Even Michael Mann and some other leading climahysterics are in favor of them. We can have Gen 6 and mini-nuclear plants, and then this would be no problem, at least according to climate cult dogma about CO2.

But, until the cult has reasonable solutions, they can f*** right off.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

9 Responses to ““Experts Say” AC Saves Lives But Is Also Killing The Planet”

  1. Dana says:

    As air conditioning units use refrigerants to pull heat out of the air, to make the air cooler for use inside, what happens to the heat pulled out of the air? It gets dumped into the outside atmosphere. So, I have to ask: how much of that ‘transported’ heat contributes to exterior temperatures being recorded?

    Current temperature at Old Creekmore Farm: 91.7º F, with a heat index of 101.3º F. Yes, we have the AC on. Sadly, the power plant runs on natural gas, and not coal.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      According to experts (one refrigeration engineer): The direct effects of A/C (cooling air with refrigerants and “pumping” the heat outside) largely balances out. But since entropy always wins, the heat transfer is never 100% efficent, and contributes a little to warming.

      Although leaked refrigerants ARE potent greenhouse gases they don’t appear to be a significant contributor.

      By far the greatest warming effect comes from the greenhouse gases produced from electricity generation from coal and gas.

      Currently, 99° F in St Louis County MO, heat index 104° F. About 15% of MO power comes from the Calloway nuclear power plant.

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    “Non-expert” Teach says: “We can have Gen 6 and mini-nuclear plants (SMRs), and then this would be no problem…”

    Can we? Are any models ready for production and deployment?

    And why should humanity waste the time and money on this now, when we have a century of coal, and a century of oil. Plenty of time.

    Relax. Mr Teach assures us that global warming is a hoax/scam. CO2 is nothing more than plant food. From Professors Arrhenius to Mann, they’ve all been lying to grift money from the rich.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Rimjob: From Professors Arrhenius to Mann, they’ve all been lying to grift money from the rich.

      Arrhenius, to his credit, later admitted to a huge error in his calculations.

      Mann was proven to be a liar.

      Better try something else, fat boy.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Arrhenius did not admit to huge errors. He concluded that increasing atmospheric CO2 would warm the atmosphere.

        Temperature Range Limits: The Arrhenius equation works best over small temperature changes. Large changes cause major prediction errors.

        Constant Value Assumptions: The equation assumes the stay fixed. In reality, heat capacity changes can make activation energy vary with temperature.

        Complex Multi-Step Reactions: Single-step reactions follow the rule easily. Multi-step biological or physical processes break the linear log pattern.

        Environmental Fluctuations: Small shifts or errors in the test temperature set point inflate data variance and skew rate predictions.

        There is no evidence that Professor Mann was proven to lie. Show your “evidence”, Mama’s Boy.

  3. Alias says:

    The last nuke built cost 30 billion and took 10 years
    You can put up a solar or wind equal to 1 nuke on 3 years

    Even red states don’t want nukes. Who will fund them? No insurance company will even insure the construction bonds.
    The levelized cost of the last 2 miles built is 20 cents per kwh. Renewables 20 year contract price of 9 cents per kwh
    Wack Trump’s war has seen fossil fuel prices “skyrocket” a word seldom if ever used since Biden left

  4. SD says:

    LIVE: Tracking Tropical Depression Five, could become Edouard | Forecast cone

    https://commoncts.blogspot.com/2026/08/live-tracking-tropical-depression-five.html

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove