Bummer: New Zealand Looking To Shield Companies From Climate (scam) Lawsuits

It wasn’t that long ago that New Zealand was one of the top tier climate cult countries in the world, but, with the end of the cultist (and hardcore socialist: she was once President of International Union of Socialist Youth) Jacinda Arden admin in early 2023, New Zealand started rolling back their belief in the cult

New Zealand:Government brings certainty to climate change tort law

New Zealand plans to amend the country’s climate law to prohibit liability arising from climate change damages. The Government has clarified that these amendments will provide businesses with certainty around their obligations.

The amended Climate Change Response Act 2002 will apply to both current and future court proceedings, including a current High Court case brought against six major emitters.

New Zealand’s Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith in an announcement on 12 May 2026 said, “The Government will amend the Climate Change Response Act 2002 to prevent findings of liability for tort for climate change damage or harm caused by greenhouse gas emissions in both current and future proceedings before the courts.

“The Government is acting now to provide legal clarity and certainty and to remove the possible development of a new regime that contradicts the framework Parliament has already enacted to respond to climate change. Our government is committed to fixing the basics, and certainty of law is essential for businesses to operate, attracting overseas investment, and stimulating economic growth.”

What does all this mean?

Climate change activists and critiques have, however, opposed the proposed amendments in the law. They said this is a controversial move that would shield polluters from climate lawsuits and undermine the rule of law.

The nation will supposedly still meet their scam obligations under the Climate Change Response Act (until they can weaken it and then kill it), but, what they’re saying is that the courts are not the place for climalawfare suits.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Bummer: New Zealand Looking To Shield Companies From Climate (scam) Lawsuits”

  1. Alias says:

    Wacko leader of the climate change deniers cult very very unpopular President. Still thinks wind mills cause cancer. And also upset he does not have ballroom to do his disco dancing in
    The very stable genius started a war and now must try to negotiate a way out. Iran doesn’t seem to be willing to meet his demands

    • Jl says:

      Johnny-who’s denying that the climate changes? Simple question, but not for you..

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Jl,

        We get that Deniers finally recognized the overwhelming evidence that the Earth is warming. Kudos. Better late than never.

        Recall that Denier leaders like Teach and Tony WUWT accused scientists of faking the temperature data until skeptics such as Spencer and Muller finally confirmed the truth.

        Funded by the conservative Koch Foundation, prominent skeptic Richard Muller (UC) ran a huuge project that analyzed billions of data points. In 2011, the team published results demonstrating that the Earth’s land had warmed by roughly 2.5F over the preceding 250 years. Even Tony WUWT finally accepted the truth. Next, the Deniers started attacking the cause.

        Many Deniers deny the scientific underpinnings of warming. Many now accept the reality but argue the cure (decarbonization) is worse than the disease. Essentially, a distinction without a difference.

        • Jl says:

          “Most deny the scientific underpinnings of warming”. You mean the scientific underpinnings that haven’t been verified yet? “Attacking the cause”. You mean practicing science, in that the cause has yet to be verified? Got it.
          Tom Karl, a director at NOAA’s National Climate Data Center, stated at a conference in 1989 that “analysis of the warming since 1881 shows most of the increase in global temperatures happened before 1919 before the most recent rise in the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. While the global climate warmed overall since 1881, it actually cooled from 1921 to 1979.”
          Find one graph today that shows what he said. You won’t find one.

  2. Alias says:

    Many people feny that greenhouse gases caused by burning largely caused by burning fossil fuels ate changing the climate faster than st any time that we know .
    These rapid climate changes will make life/survival more difficult for the most disadvantaged of humanity.
    Your Dear Leader frequently uses the word hoax referencing climate change. Are you personally unaware of his use of that word?

    • Jl says:

      But that’s not what you’ve been saying, Johnny. You just said they’re denying that the climate changes period. No one that I know of believes that. Now you’re getting into the why it changes. Nice try.
      “People deny that burning fossil fuels changes the climate faster than ever before..”
      Nope, they’re just pointing out the fact that the agw theory has yet to be verified with cause- effect evidence. Or a simple experiment. Johnny-you’re the one that’s denying that fact. Remember your straw man “argument”?

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    What do you mean by “verified”? Are you claiming all the data are faked? Are the CO2 levels verified? How about the mean global surface temperature? Stratospheric cooling (and reduced IR wavelengths absorbed by CO2)?

    So are you now claiming the Earth hasn’t warmed as much as measured?

    You may be thinking of the early 20th-century warming period (roughly 1910–1940), which occurred before CO2 concentrations were as high as now. Climatologists, including Karl, have studied this period and attribute it to a combination of natural climate variability (like solar changes and ocean cycles).

    You typed: “Find one graph today that shows what he said. You won’t find one.”

    Are you really claiming the climated scientists successfully suppressed this data?

    • Jl says:

      “Are you really saying it…”. Don’t believe your own eyes and ears? He said it, and there’s no graph that shows that anymore. How did the earth cool for 58 years as CO2 went up?
      “Verified” As I’ve always said, it’s never been verified with cause-effect evidence that CO2 is doing the warming. What you should be concerned about is why hasn’t anyone been able to show experimentally the agw theory-with trillions spent. “Are you claiming data was faked?” I’m simply relaying what Karl said. He said it at the American Geophysical Union Fall Conference in San Francisco Dec.6th, 1989.

Pirate's Cove