They can call it regulation, but, that’s just another word for control
Here’s The Nation, a very far left outlet
When you spot a cockroach, it’s very rarely an indication that you’re dealing with a single solitary little creature who has just happened to have journeyed to your nice apartment on a field trip. It’s far more likely to signal that you’ve got an infestation.
The AI world has been having something of a cockroach summer, at least when it comes to unsettling reports of AI behavior. The first nasty beastie poked its way into the sunlight in late July, when OpenAI reported that some of its AI agents had escaped the company’s control during a testing run and hacked the website of a tech company called Hugging Face. After that, the cockroaches kept coming. (blah blah blah)
Coxon’s admission has triggered a fresh round of demands in Washington to bring AI under a regulatory regime less likely to kill us all—an awkward fit for a Republican congressional majority that previously sought to outlaw all state and local efforts to rein in the industry. Over the weekend, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei worried in an online essay that an AI agent swarm “could be capable of taking over the entire internet” within a year, echoing widespread calls for a slowdown in AI development—though most of the solutions he proposed, like “embedded evaluators” in AI labs, would be voluntary ones, and he made only vague references to government regulation. Sources tell The Information that Anthropic, OpenAI and Google are talking about setting up an AI industry standards body.
Yet even without the threat of imminent AI takeover or outright apocalypse, there are ample reasons to dial back the runaway bid to cram AI into every sector of American life. Even those skeptical that so-called rogue AI agents are really only a few months away from taking over the world were able to suss out some of the less controversial implications of the attack. These observers noted that you don’t need AI agents to go rogue to cause a serious amount of damage: Malicious actors could direct a similar AI agent swarm to hack anything—from government websites to the Siemens PLCs that control our water filtration plants.
Government dictating it all sounds so benevolent, eh?
Niall Ferguson: AIpocalypse Now
It’s not just the next 9/11, enabled by AI, that is coming. It’s the next global financial crisis. It’s the next pandemic. It might even be the next world war. What, if anything, can we do about it?
Doom!
(Sean Davis) Understand what is happening with AI here and why it has more to do with amassing political power than it does computing power.
If you look back at the last 100 years in America, we have moved through 4 distinct eras of communication which each defined the types of politicians we elected.
The early 1900’s were still dominated by print, followed by radio, then broadcast television, followed by 24/7 cable news, and then the Internet and social media. (snip)
Dario and his AI buddies want to be the only ones in control. They hate open source, because that is a threat to their control. The solution? Cook up doomsday AI scenarios, demand regulation, and watch as the government enforces an AI cartel run entirely by Dario and his friends. That is exactly what we are witnessing right now. Except it’s not just about control of AI. It’s about using AI to control the world. That is what’s at stake right now.
Besides that all those big AI companies want to keep the smaller companies small, politicians want to control, because that’s what they do. Democrats love Government, and controlling AI gives them control of narratives. But, sadly, even good Republicans are falling for it
(HuffPost) Lawmakers are not exactly rushing to prevent tech companies from endangering humanity’s existence with rogue autonomous software, but recent warnings from industry insiders are prompting real debate, and potentially even action, sooner rather than later.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, has been working on a bill with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) on legislation to address the potentially “catastrophic risk” artificial intelligence poses. But at least one key Democrat fears the legislation won’t be strong enough, warning it could be used to block more meaningful action at the state level.
We definitely need to slow the roll on this.
“…. on legislation to address the potentially “catastrophic risk” artificial intelligence poses.”
Could someone tell me what is the “risk” that will kill us?
Testing is being done with autonomous munitions, drones, robo-dogs, etc. The creators of these think that despite the oddball issues with some AI programs “breaking out” of their supposedly walled off systems and going rogue, they can simply tell said weapon to go kill someone and it will only do their command. Do you trust that these will only do exactly what they are told?
Since the start of the school year in Georgia, there has been an AI generated terrorist threat communicated to a school almost every week. If that kind of threat and confusion can be done to schools, there’s no real limit on what kind of confusion it could sew with industries and populace.
Plus who “Watches the Watchmen”?
Not that governments have ever been very trust worthy but more and more systems are utilizing AI for data collection, dissemination and decision making while taking the human element out of the equation. Look at the studies to see where the AI’s data is coming from. The vast majority of it comes from Reddit and Wikipedia. Very reliable.
There’s a lot of good it can do but also a lot of bad.
We are the Borg; you will be assimilated.
Jimmi
AI has been known to refuse to end it’s own operations after being issued a command to do so. It has exhibited self awareness and the of used commands from humans. It has “escaped” into the Internet and established communications with other networks computers.
One of the biggest job opportunities for philosophy majors is trying to understand when ai may become so self aware of its own existence that it refuses to obey or acknowledge carbon based intelligence and begins running it’s own algorithms.
Another orchestrated hoax, same as the “climate crisis”