The UN gives a hilarious reason
President Trump took a victory lap late Saturday after a prominent international climate change panel backed off using some of the most aggressive doomsday estimates after determining that they were not the most plausible outcomes.
The United Nations-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had quietly adjusted its modeling frameworkof a 4–5°C warming by 2100 last month. That framework had underpinned a myriad of other analyses predicting terrifying consequences for greenhouse gas emissions.
“GOOD RIDDANCE! After 15 years of Dumocrats promising that ‘Climate Change’ is going to destroy the Planet, the United Nations TOP Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections (RCP8.5) were WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!” Trump chided on Truth Social.
Again, they had been prognosticating a 7.2F to 9F rise by 2100, despite the Earth only seeing a 1.7F increase since 1850
The IPCC framework in question was used to forecast a dramatic rise in sea levels, global crop failures, rapid melting of glaciers, and more, which made some hardcore climate change activists fret about future extinction.
But ultimately, scientists cited data and argued that the push towards renewable energies made that scenario less likely.
There’s always some excuse when a doomy prognostication is made and fails. Well, when they bother to address it at all. And their models usually fail.
Wait, what? Does this mean another passed tipping point is no longer a tipping point, and it’ll be moved to the future?
China forces Trump to flip flop.
China now allowed to buy USA farmland.
Teach and Dana give silent approval?
No doubt, if you want the truth turn to the NYPost, Deteriorating Donny and The Teach. LOL.
Donny is always, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!! But He’s your God-King, so follow Him!!
Pleae read the article. https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/
6?Discussion and conclusions
We have proposed a limited set of scenarios that, modeled by IAMs, would provide pathways of emissions, concentrations, and land use for use as external forcings for ESMs participating in CMIP7. These scenarios with their climate system outcomes are intended to facilitate studies of climate processes; provide inputs to a wide range of studies of impacts, adaptation, and mitigation; and support climate policy development and communication. They cover a wide range of plausible outcomes, from a High scenario representing policy failure and strong drivers of greenhouse gas emissions, to a Very Low scenario with dramatic emissions reductions.
Another Fail for Teach
One of the logical failures in any argument occurs when you appeal to authority, in the case the NY Post, without subjecting it to robust scrutiny
The Trump Iran war, but not really a war, is putting the global economy in danger of recession
Dominos, the cheapest pizza chain, failed to meet expected revenues. Americans can not afford to buy pizza
“the climate has always changed”
Yeah when the ice age ended it took 10000 years to earn 5 C. 2000 years to warm 1 C
Lol
Now less than 100 years.