It would be a whole lot easier to simply catch and deport
Appeals court reverses decision on immigrant detention, leaving no-bond policy in place
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a July 2 panel decision requiring bond hearings for immigrants held under the Trump administration’s mandatory detention policy.
For now, that means many immigration prisoners from all over the country can still be held indefinitely without bond in some of the nation’s largest detention centers in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. The Trump administration policy requires detention without bond for an immigrant who crossed the border illegally, no matter how long they’ve been here.
The appeals court will rehear the case in September. (snip)
Some judges in the 5th Circuit had already ordered bond hearings or releases based on the July 2 ruling. The Supreme Court has agreed to take up a related case and resolve the conflict in its next session starting in October.
The law states that illegals can be held up to 6 months, charged a small fine, and deported. Nothing about bond hearings, especially knowing that the illegals will just disappear. Just deport them.
Our distinguished host is exactly right: it is more efficient and certainly less expensive to ship them out almost immediately upon apprehension. If they believe they have a case to make to remain in the United States, they can make their cases at the US embassies or consulates in their home countries.
It is MOST efficient for Queen Donny to instruct his ill-trained ICE goons to shoot all Hispanic-looking men while in their cars with their children. Bullets are a lot cheaper than detention center beds! “Bullets, Not Beds!!” Shout it from the rooftops!
If a nice white American objects, Queen Donny has insructed his ill-trained ICE goons to shoot them too! “Off With Their Heads!!”
Will Sen Collins second guess voting for $20 BILLION more of your money for ICE? After all, Donny’s ill-trained and reckless STASI killed the WRONG FUCKING man while in his car in HER state of Maine…
Mr Dana favors efficiency in ridding America of these less-than-pure-white sub-humans. Hmm, that rings a bell, historically speaking.
Nahhh, I support the deportation of lily-white illegals, too.
In the meantime, our angry agitator for sexual abusers defended a now deported sex offender and maybe being less rapey than fully penetrated rape of a ten-year-old, because he seems to oppose any deportations of illegals, because Donald Trump is President.
Since illegal aliens are by definition a flight risk, lack of bond is the only rational policy. As Dana pointed out, since the policy is to immediately deport, it is also efficient to hold them pending action.
AMENDMENT IV
The right of the PEOPLE to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
AMENDMENT V
No PERSON shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury… nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
…nor shall any State deprive any PERSON of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
_______________________
What is due process?
Procedural due process mandates that the government must follow fair, established procedures before it can penalize or deprive someone of a protected right. The core requirements include: Notice: Informing the individual of the government’s intent to take action. Opportunity to Be Heard: Providing a fair and quick chance for the individual to defend themselves. Neutral Decision-Maker: Having the case reviewed by an impartial judge or tribunal.
Substantive Due Process: Substantive due process acts as a safeguard over the content of laws themselves. It dictates that certain fundamental rights (such as the right to privacy, freedom of speech, and the right to marry) cannot be infringed upon by the government, regardless of how fair the procedures are. Laws affecting these rights must be related to a legitimate government interest and not be arbitrary or irrational.
__________________________________
It seems as if grabbing a PERSON off the streets and locking them away without due process violates our Constituion.