If All You See…

February 21, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is horrible bad fog from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Victory Girls Blog, with a post on the SCOTUS tariff ruling not being the win Dems think it is.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

This entry was written by William Teach and posted on at 1:00 pm and filed under If All You See. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

3 Responses to “If All You See…”

  1. drowningpuppies says:
    February 21, 2026 at 2:30 pm

    Oh Canada…

    So, it was a shock when Canadian economist Trevor Tombe and the International Monetary Fund ran the numbers in 2023 and 2024 and concluded that Canada had, in fact, become poorer than Alabama.

    But they have “free” healthcare, eh.

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2026/02/21/out-of-nowhere-canadians-are-now-poorer-than-alabamians-n2671681

  2. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    February 21, 2026 at 2:30 pm

    Those dang foreigners at the Olympics have been down right nice to the United States’ contestants!! There was fear that the global unpopularity of the uber-hateful trump would spill onto the U.S. contestants. And the judges have been fair. The U.S. athletes have comported themselves beautifully, as well.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:
    February 22, 2026 at 8:54 am

    Some things never change! Historian HC Richardson (Boston College):

    “Democrats promised to lower the tariffs that drove up prices for consumers, while Republican leaders agreed with industrialists that they needed the tariffs that protected their products from foreign competition. Republicans assumed that the upcoming 1890 census would prove that the West was becoming the driving force in American politics, and admitting new states full of Republican voters would dramatically increase the strength of the Republican Party in Congress. The one new representative each new state would send to the House would be nice, but two new Republican senators per state would guarantee the Republicans would hold the Senate for the foreseeable future.

    Then, too, the new states would change the number of electors in the Electoral College, where each state gets a number of electors equal to the number of the state’s U.S. senators and representatives. (Benjamin) Harrison’s men were only too aware that Harrison had lost the popular vote and won only in the Electoral College, and they were keen to skew the Electoral College more heavily toward the Republicans before the 1892 election.”

    The Republican Party has never trusted democratic processes!

    Is it somewhat a little bit ironic that it’s Republicans who oppose free market economics?

Pirate's Cove