You’ll never guess why
Nothing says journalistic independence like getting handouts with taxpayer money from the government, eh?
THE AUTHOR
PAGES
Recent Comments
- drowningpuppies on If All You See…: “Rimjob wants to know what is the issue with having and enforcing immigration laws. Seriously? Pretty close to the dumbest…” May 5, 23:59
- david7134 on If All You See…: “Fat jeff, You are not keeping up. It is estimated that there are about 30 wet backs in our country.…” May 5, 23:59
- Dana on If All You See…: “The malcontent from Missouri wrote: A mother had a choice. Leave alone or leave with her child. The gawdawful DHS…” May 5, 22:46
- Elwood P. Dowd on If All You See…: “Even the formerly astute Mr Dana realizes that the Forty-$eventh administration is in disarray, explaining his increasing panic.” May 5, 19:12
- Elwood P. Dowd on If All You See…: “I’ve already explained how the K-Y Kid is wrong on denying that trump had children that were American citizens deported.…” May 5, 19:08
They aren’t defending their journalistic integrity since that isn’t challenged. They are defending their “right” to taxpayer compelled funding. They could easily save the lost revenues by shutting down redundant stations. Especially since all of their content is available on line. Radio stations are no longer needed.
And yes, Congress gets to appropriate the funds, but there is nothing requiring the Executive to actually spend that money. Just as the Executive has the power to decide how (or whether) to enforce specific laws, they also have the power to decide not to disburse monies that Congress has appropriated.
Otherwise, we’d have been able to force Biden to enforce our border security and immigration laws. But he had the discretion on how to allocate the resources Congress gave him.
Why can’t the Left, which they love, adore and dedicate their loyal to, make up the difference once the taxpayer puts and runs?
Because…