Hillary Shared Names Of Intelligence Agents Over Her Breachable Server

Remember the freakout over the release of Valerie Plame’s name as a CIA agent? Even though Joe Wilson featured her name and employer on his Who’s Who page, it resulted in a massive investigation, which went on for years past when the special prosecutor knew who the leaker was, and liberals wanted Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs, often along with Dick Cheney and George W. Bush. What do they think of Hillary?

(Breitbart) Hillary Clinton posted and shared the names of concealed U.S. intelligence officials on her unprotected email system.

Federal records reveal that Clinton swapped these highly classified names on an email account that was vulnerable to attack and was breached repeatedly by Russia-linked hacker attempts. These new revelations — reminiscent of the Valerie Plame scandal during George W. Bush’s tenure — could give FBI investigators the evidence they need to make a case that Clinton violated the Espionage Act by mishandling national defense information through “gross negligence.”

Numerous names cited in Clinton’s emails have been redacted in State Department email releases with the classification code “B3 CIA PERS/ORG,” a highly specialized classification that means the information, if released, would violate the Central Intelligence Act of 1949.

The State Department produced a document to Judicial Watch in April 2014 that identifies different types of “(b)(3)” redactions, including “CIA PERS/ORG,” which it defines as information “Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute … Central Intelligence Act of 1949.”

There are quite a few examples available at the Breitbart article of this conduct, which occurred via a server that was set up in violation of State Department policy, as well as federal record keeping laws and national security laws. She was told not to do it. Yet, she still did. She, and the people who worked for her at the time, some of whom still do, put national security at risk in willful defiance of federal law.

Be honest, Liberals: if Hillary was a Republican, you’d be calling for Hillary to be prosecuted. You’d be demonstrating. You’d be screaming it to the news media. All the leftist groups would be constantly advocating for the prosecution of her and her associates. If you’re honest with yourself, you know that’s true. You have a lady running for POTUS who willfully blew off the national security for her own convenience.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Hillary Shared Names Of Intelligence Agents Over Her Breachable Server”

  1. Jeffery says:

    Breitbart? LOL. The right-wing spin machine puts a new nail in her coffin every week, and yet there she is, still leading. If any of this is true, the FBI will do their jobs, unless you think the FBI is fatally corrupted.

    President Clinton or President Sanders, it doesn’t matter, Congressional Repukes will obstruct. The Prez will veto.

  2. Zhytamyr says:

    I’ll be, you can make a post that doesn’t reference the KKK or man on man sex? Who knew?

  3. drowningpuppies says:

    I’ll be, you can make a post that doesn’t reference the KKK or man on man sex? Who knew?

    Just wait a few minutes…

  4. drowningpuppies says:

    You have a lady running for POTUS who willfully blew off the national security for her own convenience.

    That’s no lady, son.

  5. Conservative Beaner says:

    If any of this is true, the FBI will do their jobs, unless you think the FBI is fatally corrupted.

    No Jeff, just the DOJ and Obama.

  6. drowningpuppies says:


    But, I said this many times, it was still a mistake. If I could go back I would do it differently.

    The statement every criminal makes after they’ve caught.

  7. Jeffery says:

    Zamboni,

    Only need to call out Teach’s racism when he’s being racist (see his post on mooching).

    Only need to bring up man on man sex to rein in the dickheads’ comments. It’s a tactic, it works, but only for a while. Wait and watch.

  8. Jeffery says:

    What crime was committed?

  9. drowningpuppies says:

    What criminal investigation?

  10. Zachriel says:

    was breached repeatedly by Russia-linked hacker attempts.

    The email referenced in the link indicates no such thing, but rather shows that Clinton was aware of the possible virus and advised the purported sender of the problem.

  11. Zhytamyr says:

    It seems from your posts that you frequently have gay sex and rough amoral men in uniforms on your mind.

  12. Jeffery says:

    Z,

    And it seems from your “posts” that you frequently have me on your mind.

  13. […] Pirate’s Cove: Remember the freakout over the release of Valerie Plame’s name as a CIA agent? Even though Joe Wilson featured her name and employer on his Who’s Who page, it resulted in a massive investigation, which went on for years past when the special prosecutor knew who the leaker was, and liberals wanted Karl Rove frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs, often along with Dick Cheney and George W. Bush. What do they think of Hillary?  more […]

  14. […] William Teach on The Pirate’s Cove: Hillary Shared Names Of Intelligence Agents Over Her Breachable Server […]

  15. Jeffery says:

    Trump-Sharia: The Republican candidate believes that Hispanics should only be judged by Hispanics. White Christians by white Christians. Muslims by Muslims. Blacks by Blacks.

    Trump’s attacks against Judge Gonzalo Curiel for being Hispanic are un-American. Judge Curiel is as American as Trump. Establishment Republicans circled the wagon in defense of Trump, with Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell explaining that the only important thing is for the party of Lincoln to win the election. Not exactly a profile in courage.

  16. Hank_M says:

    “Be honest, Liberals”

    Teach, as you can see, the liberals here simply ignored the article, blessed Hillary’s actions and changed the subject once again.

    No offense, but those two words, “honest” and “liberals” do not belong in the same sentence.

Pirate's Cove