Yet, somehow, the climate alarmists keep defending this lying un-scientific body, via Watts Up With That from There Is No Frakking “Scientific Concesus” On Global Warming
Considered the climate Bible by governments around the world, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report is meant to be a scientific analysis of the most authoritative research.
Instead, it references literature generated by Greenpeace – an organization known more for headline-grabbing publicity stunts than sober-minded analysis. (Eight IPCC-cited Greenpeace publications are listed at the bottom of this post.)
In one section of this Nobel-winning report, climate change is linked to coral reef degradation. The sole source for this claim? A Greenpeace report titled “Pacific in Peril“ (see Hoegh-Guldberg below). Here the report relies on a Greenpeace document to establish the lower-end of an estimate involving solar power plants (Aringhoff).
Dana Laframboise has much, much, much more on the subject, so, head on over and read the whole thing.
Meanwhile,
- Roger Pielke, Jr catches the IPCC using a fake graph.
- Joseph D’Aleo states that NASA and the NOAA are complicit in data manipulation.
- Objectivist Individualist finds no temperature increases at rural stations since 1900 (I’m a little skeptical about that)
- Uh oh: the current cold spell is killing coral off the Florida coast.
