That would be the 90th Fighter Squadron, known as the “Dicemen,” and the 525th Fighter Squadron, the “Bulldogs,” both of which operate the F-22
When President Obama spoke to troops at Alaska’s Elmendorf Air Force Base last month, the unit there parked a shiny new F-22 fighter plane in the hangar. But according to multiple sources, White House aides demanded the plane be changed to an older F-15 fighter because they didn’t want Obama speaking in front of the F-22, a controversial program he fought hard to end.
“White House aides actually made them remove the F-22-said they would not allow POTUS to be pictured with the F-22 in any way, shape, or form,” one source close to the unit relayed.
Stephen Lee, a public affairs officer at Elmendorf, confirmed to The Cable that the F-22 was parked in the hangar and then was replaced by an F-15 at the White House’s behest.
The Obama admin has worked hard to cancel the F-22 program, but, when one is giving a speech praising the two above Squadrons, and refusing to give said speech in front of the plane they fly, that would count as an insult.
Crossed at Stop The ACLU and Right Wing News
Nobama should get 22 Fs.
I would prefer one loss on the first Tuesday in November, 2012. And about 80 losses next November
In case anyone had any doubt, this should answer all questions. The shit for brains at 1600 is not interested in the security and sovereignty of The United States of America. I said in the autumn of last year, the man is a traitor and lately his mouth has pretty much confirmed that.
Yup. I SAID IT, TRAITOR.
And yes, I have done more for the Republic in a single day than this worthless piece of protoplasm has done in his entire life. And I can produce documentation to that effect. They are called DD-214s.
Glenn,
First of all, thank you for your service. I have a question about your statement. What about this story solidifies in your mind the fact that our President is a traitor?
Not a bloody thing. Just the way he is. And the Old Retired Petty Officer is allowed to call on the carpet any and all politicians up to and including the cinc.
But it seems to me he is catering to those who are our adversaries if not downright enemies. And the screwing he is giving the Air Force and the Republic over the defense of same is reprehensible and in the eyes of the Retired First Class, treason. We really don’t need a reason
And for those twenty years, I would do it all over again!
I’m not sure I follow. In your last comment, you stated that if anyone “had any doubt, this should answer all questions”, apparently about the fact that Obama is “not interested in the security and sovereignty” of the US, and that he “is a traitor”. It sounded to me like you were saying that this story was the final proof for you that our President is a traitor.
And then you say that it’s the “screwing he is giving the Air Force…”
And then you say “we really don’t need a reason”?
I’m confused. Is it because he didn’t want more F-22s, or is there really no reason?
It’s a patriotic American thing, reasic. We don’t expect you to understand.
If it’s so simple, why can’t you explain it?
Why bother? You aren’t going to get it. And even if you did understand it, you would still disagree. That’s what trolls do, reasic. You come to a conservative site, you trash the writers, you trash the people who post, you spew your leftist agenda, you post links that still don’t cover the simple fact that your side has proven itself untrustworthy, and you still insist we should trust them and you.
It would be one thing if your screed actually encouraged someone to think, but it doesn’t. It’s the exact same claptrap every other leftie troll spews on every other right-wing site. You offer as much to the conversation as a fart in a car. The only reason I even bother to respond to your idiocy is that, at those particular moments, I don’t have anything better to do. At best, you are a distraction. Mostly, you’re just an annoyance. You’re not winning anyone over to your side; your side has proven itself false too many times. So either you’re too stupid to figure this out, or you know it, but you still come here to post annoying, pointless drivel.
THIS is why I insult you and call you clown-shoes, Reasic. This is why I rarely bother to link information for your benefit. I’ve encountered your kind enough that I know I could hold a smoking gun directly under your nose, and you’d still insist that it was never fired. You aren’t here to gain information; you’ve made it abundantly clear that you consider us ignorant hicks. And we’ve made it clear to you, repeatedly, that we aren’t buying your leftist agenda. So why are you here?
You’re here to annoy and disrupt conversations. Period. I, for one, am done trying to explain things to you that you either can not or WILL not understand.
lol, TFMo. I love how you pretend you are withholding some critical information from me, because you’re afraid I won’t “trust” it. If I made similar arguments about global warming, you’d jump all over me for belonging to the religion of Al Gore.
You may have had bad experiences with certain people in the past, TFMo, but I’m not them. I’m man enough to admit when I’m wrong. First, though, I must see evidence to that effect.
You’ve been shown evidence, Reasic. I’m not “withholding” any critical information that you can’t find for yourself outside your echo chamber.
The AGW jackasses damned themselves with their own words, but you ignore it. Obama has done little more than lie since he came onto the scene, but you ignore it. The politicians have repeatedly deceived us about HOPERcare, and you ignore it. You seem to be a big fan of trends, I[d expect you to see this one…but then, that wouldn’t help your agenda.