Leftist LBGT Protesters Look To Eat Their Own

It’s highly amusing when the grievance monster victimhooders start whacking each other

At pride events, protests claim prejudice, exclusion

Gay pride marches in New York City, San Francisco and in between this weekend will have plenty of participants – and also protests directed at them from other members of the LGBT community, speaking out against what they see as increasingly corporate pride celebrations that prioritize the experiences of gay white men and ignore the issues continuing to face black and brown LGBT people. (snip)

In Minneapolis, organizers of the Twin Cities Pride Parade planned for this Sunday asked the police department to limit participation following the acquittal of police officer Jeronimo Yanez in the death of Castile. The openly gay police chief said the decision was divisive and hurtful to LGBT officers, which the organizers acknowledged. But Twin Cities Pride Board Chairwoman Darcie Baumann said the decision was made to be sensitive to those grieving after the verdict “and seeing those uniforms brings angst and tension and the feeling of unrest.”

The cops should bow out completely, but, then, that would just allow the violent lefties to run roughshod over each other and other people.

The recent flare-up of racial tensions comes as no surprise to Isaiah Wilson, director of external affairs for the National Black Justice Coalition, one of the few national groups focused specially on black LGBT rights.

He said the broader LGBT-rights movement “has been whitewashed” – dominated to a large extent by white gay men.

“Black queer and trans folks have always been there, but our contributions have been devalued,” Wilson said.

Victimhood Society being victims

“The real test will be, can the LGBT movement own up to its historic legacy of racism and evolve to be more accountable and inclusive of people of color?” Minter, a transgender man, wondered. “If not, then it will cease to be a major political movement.”

They can’t help themselves. They have to be victims and throw out racial grievance mongering even amongst themselves. Get the popcorn.

New York City spokesman James Fallarino said if there are any disruptions or protests during the event, “We’re going to make sure we do everything in our power to respect the people who are disrupting or protesting and to respect their message.”

That sounds like NYC will stand back and allow the same type of violence and vandalism we’ve seen during many other Leftist protests. Have fun, Democratic Party run cities!

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Leftist LBGT Protesters Look To Eat Their Own”

  1. Dana says:

    That title was intentional, wot?

    • Lettuce, bacon, gouda, tomato.

      I kept looking at the headline going “something’s off”, finally said “hang it all” and hit publish

  2. Dana says:

    Our esteemed host wrote:

    The cops should bow out completely, but, then, that would just allow the violent lefties to run roughshod over each other and other people.

    No worries, mate! How effectively can someone with a limp risk throw a rock, or a punch?

  3. Dana says:

    Damn it, limp wrist!

  4. Jeffery says:

    Dana typed, referring to TEACHs raunchy headline:

    That title was intentional

    Closeted gays, especially closeted conservative men, lash out, mock and ridicule openly LGBTQ people. They feel it removes suspicions that their conservative friends may have about them. Not all lifelong bachelors are gay anymore than all over-compensating “macho” men are straight. One think is for sure, those that bully others are either sociopaths or terribly insecure and weak.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      sociopaths or terribly insecure and weak.

      In other words;
      little jeffuckery

    • Dana says:

      It seems that mocking homosexual stereotypes has an uncommonly large impact on Jeffrey, almost as though he is as much personally as politically insulted.

      I, of course, would never assume that such is the case, knowing how often strong, virile, heterosexual men are leading, and defending, the ‘LGBTQP’ movement. Indeed, I am certain that our Jeffrey, were it to turn out that he was of what one government document referred to as “minority sexual orientation,” would be a top rather than a bottom.

  5. Jeffery says:

    Daan doth protest too much, methinks… not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    Not too worry. Your secret is safe with us. Quite often caricature “he-men” lead secret lives – not that there’s anything wrong with that.

    But seriously, why do “men” like you and TEACH mock and ridicule LGBTQ folks? Are they hurting you? Your town? Your business? The nation? The world? Is it a religious belief, much like being anti-abortion?

    We defend any and all that the New Con Men attack – women, children, the poor, gays, Blacks, Muslims, disabled, Mexicans… If you attacked and mocked Amish, we’d defend Amish. If you attacked and mocked Mormons we’d defend Mormons. If you attacked and mocked Lutherans we’d defend Lutherans.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      We defend any and all

      Nah, little jeffuckery just likes to bitch and encourage others to shoot people that didn’t vote for bernie…

    • Dana says:

      Jeffrey asked:

      But seriously, why do “men” like you and TEACH mock and ridicule LGBTQ folks? Are they hurting you? Your town? Your business? The nation? The world? Is it a religious belief, much like being anti-abortion?

      We mock the mockworthy, we ridicule the ridiculous.

      And, of course, they do hurt some people’s businesses, as they have sued some Christian businesspeople who do not wish to participate in something they see as immoral.

      Is it a religious belief? Yes, of course, but it is also a practical one: men and women are complementary, and two (or more) men or women are effectively incomplete.

      We defend any and all that the New Con Men attack – women, children, the poor, gays, Blacks, Muslims, disabled, Mexicans… If you attacked and mocked Amish, we’d defend Amish. If you attacked and mocked Mormons we’d defend Mormons. If you attacked and mocked Lutherans we’d defend Lutherans.

      We should expect, then, that you will be defending Catholics and Baptists, who were so trashed and scorned by Hillary Clinton’s campaign staff.

      But your statement certainly is true! You (plural) very much look the other way when it comes to shari’a law oppressing women, at female genital mutilation, ’cause it’s part of some Muslim cultures, at terrorism, when perpetrated by Muslims, at homosexuals being thrown off buildings or hanged, because it’s Muslims doing it, all things an honest liberal would say he abhors, because these things are being done by Muslims.

      By any logical consistency, liberals and conservatives ought to be united on these issues, but we’re not, because y’all would rather attack anything Republican or conservative rather that do something really radical like examine the issue.

  6. Jeffery says:

    Daan,

    We mock the mockworthy, we ridicule the ridiculous.

    So it’s simple bigotry. Understood. As far as it being religious, are you admitting that your fundamentalist religion is similar to the Islamic fundamentalists?

    US Muslims as a group do not practice genital mutilation, terrorism or throw gays off buildings. We will continue to criticize ALL who abuse other humans – although our focus is on America and Americans. Yes, we would defend Catholics and Baptists from unfair attacks and mockery.

    Liberals and Cons are united against the murderous terrorists. But Cons want to blame an entire faith rather than the actual perpetrators.

    You are correct that we oppose the New Conservative movement for it’s emphasis on hatred of all persons not white, xtian, straight or conservative “enough”.

    • Dana says:

      Jeffrey cannot have missed the stories:

      US Muslims as a group do not practice genital mutilation, terrorism or throw gays off buildings.

      From CNN, not exactly a right-wing site:

      The alarming rise of female genital mutilation in America
      By Michelle Krupa, CNN | Updated 12:08 PM ET, Thu May 11, 2017

      (CNN)It’s a brutal practice that’s inflicted on thousands of girls and women every year. Female genital mutilation, or female ritual cutting, involves altering or injuring female genital organs. It’s often done by people with no medical training and in filthy places, posing horrendous health risks that can linger for decades. Most victims are told never to talk about it — and some don’t survive to tell their stories. Even as girls and women across the globe faces these risks every day, misconceptions abound. To end the practice, experts and survivors say this practice must be drawn out of the shadows. Here’s what you need to know:

      It’s often painful and harrowing …

      Some women say they have no memory of being cut and don’t feel any pain at the incision site. Others end up ravaged and require special medical procedures just to be able to menstruate or give birth. It all depends on the type of FGM, which experts have classified by the part or parts of the body that get cut. Cases run the spectrum, from pricking the clitoris to removing it completely to sewing up skin around the vagina.

      You can follow the link, and if you do, you’ll read that the incidence has tripled in the United States. You’ve been reading this site long enough that there is no way you cannot have heard about this!

      Liberals and Cons are united against the murderous terrorists. But Cons want to blame an entire faith rather than the actual perpetrators.

      Really?

      “Astonishing” two in three British Muslims would NOT give police terror tip-offs
      TWO thirds of British Muslims would not inform the police if they thought that somebody close to them had become involved with terrorist sympathisers, according to a poll.

      By Laura Mowat | PUBLISHED: 10:00, Mon, Apr 11, 2016 | UPDATED: 10:40, Mon, Apr 11, 2016

      That was a UK, not US, study, but it demonstrates the problem: just like the fact that most Germans weren’t Nazis, the remainder of the German population enabled the Nazis. Most of them had little choice, of course, because the Nazis held the power of the state, but what the Islamist terrorists have found is a safe haven, places for concealment and support among the Muslim populations.

      The Israelis, who have been fighting this for far longer than we have, learned this lesson; that’s why they destroy the homes of terrorists, to fight the community as much as the individual terrorists.

      • Jeffery says:

        According the CDC article cited in the CNN article:

        https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Humanitarian/Special%20Situations/fgmutilation.pdf

        Results. Approximately 513,000 women and girls in the United States were at risk for FGM/C or its consequences in 2012, which was more than three times higher than the earlier estimate, based on 1990 data. The increase in the number of women and girls younger than 18 years of age at risk for FGM/C was more than four times that of previous estimates.
        Conclusion. The estimated increase was wholly a result of rapid growth in the number of immigrants from FGM/C-practicing countries living in the United States and not from increases in FGM/C prevalence in those countries. Scientifically valid information regarding whether women or their daughters have actually undergone FGM/C and related information that can contribute to efforts to prevent the practice in the United States and provide needed health services to women who have undergone FGM/C are needed.

        From the actual data, filtered through the CNN article, filtered through your comment, being “at risk for” has transmogrified to a three fold increase in incidence. What the actual study points out is there are more immigrants from regions where the barbaric practice in endemic. The researchers did not even hazard and estimate of the number of girls undergoing the barbaric practice in the US> CNN also pointed out that both fundamentalist Muslims and fundamentalist christians performed this horrid procedure as a method to control women. The CDC data do not differentiate between incidence and being from such a country. Certainly it doesn’t differentiate between immigrants who were mutilated overseas and girls mutilated here. According to your CNN article there has been one prosecution in the US (still ongoing). You mock an entire religion over one incident? Maybe cuts to NIH and CDC proposed by trump/GOP will help gather the necessary data.

        CNN also pointed out that the practice is decreasing worldwide, thankfully.

        Your CNN citation:

        It’s practiced in households at all educational levels and all social classes and occurs among many religious groups, including Muslims, Christians and animists…

        Note too that male genital mutilation is a widespread practice in Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

        And:

        A New York City infant contracted herpes last month as a result of an Orthodox Jewish procedure known as metzitzah b’peh (MBP) that involves orally sucking the blood off a newborn’s penis after circumcision, according to the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH).

        The news, which came in an April 3 email alert from the New York City Bureau of Sexually Transmitted Disease Control, marks the 13th such case in New York City since 2000. Two of those infants died (including one last year), and two others have suffered brain damage as a result, according to a department alert from January.

        13 cases of herpes transmitted to infants in a single American city, and two deaths. Do you hold fundamentalis Judaism and fundamentalist Jews as a group, responsible. Should we ban travel from Israel?

        • Jeffery says:

          dana,

          And let me help you out:

          http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/female-genital-mutilation-case-2-oakland-county-women-now-charged

          The Burhani Medical Clinic in Livonia is owned by Dr. Fakhruddin Attar, who is accused of conspiring with the other defendants to perform female genital mutilations on young girls. Federal authorities believe the couple has performed the surgery on more than 100 girls.

          This is an update on the case I cited earlier. They are members of a fundamentalist Muslim sect from India, and if convicted should be punished appropriately (life would be fine with me).

          Do you favor the US supporting the UNs and WHO’s efforts to stop female mutilation worldwide?

  7. drowningpuppies says:

    Yes, we would defend Catholics and Baptists from unfair attacks and mockery.

    Thanks for the chuckle, little jeffuckery.

  8. Jeffery says:

    Dnaa typed:

    We mock the mockworthy, we ridicule the ridiculous.

    Using that standard we should all mock any religion based on supernatural beliefs, which encompasses almost all major religions. For example, xtianity is based on the superstitions of stone age goatherders. Seriously, do you christies really believe in god, angels, demons and miracles? And the fundies among you want to impose/inflict your xtian sharia on others.

Pirate's Cove