Washington Post: The Problem Is Not Selling Baby Parts, But Exposing The Selling Of Baby Parts

It’s still interesting, but, not in a good way, how leftists who support abortion on demand will Blamestorm those who are against abortion on demand, blaming them all for the infrequent and small issues regarding violence against Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills. Yet, they mostly refuse to acknowledge that people who yell Allahu Akbar and cite the Koran before blowing people up, sawing heads off, shooting up civilians, flying planes into buildings, etc, have anything to do with Islam in the least.

Abortion rights groups: Political rhetoric contributed to shooting

To many abortion rights advocates, it seemed only a matter of time before something like this happened.

Ever since the summer, when an antiabortion group accused Planned Parenthood of illegally selling fetal tissue, threats against the organization had escalated to unprecedented levels, abortion providers say. They stepped up collaboration with the FBI and local police and stiffened security at clinics. But on Friday, their worst fears came true: A man walked into a health center in Colorado Springs and opened fire.

See? It’s not a problem that Planned Parenthood was caught in a sting in which they were selling aborted babies in possible contradiction to the law, and laughing about it, and thinking about buying Lamborghinis. No, the problem is that someone dared expose that the were doing all this. The Washington Post, writer Sandhya Somashekhar, and abortion supporters seem to be very upset about this whole free speech thing. Even though, as we see in paragraph 3

Police have not yet identified a clear motive for the shooting, which killed a police officer, Garrett Swasey, and two other people and left more than six injured. But the suspect, identified as Robert Lewis Dear Jr., attacked a clinic run by Planned Parenthood, a longtime foil of antiabortion activists that has been under heightened scrutiny in recent months. During his arrest, Dear referred to “baby parts,” a law enforcement official said.

We know the guy is a complete wackjob, who registered to vote as a woman, and is not registered Republican. He’s also apparently a stoner, smoking lots and lots of marijuana, so, why aren’t the media blaming his use of pot? Oh, right, it wouldn’t fit their narrative in protecting abortion and Planned Parenthood.

Do we blame the Pope? He’s against abortion. But, again, the most interesting part is that it is perfectly acceptable to blame every pro-life person, especially if they are a Republican, for the actions of a tiny, tiny, tiny minority, and for daring to be against abortion. But, we cannot even blame the part of Islam that is radical, and even violent, in the least. Because noting that they are believers in Islam is supposedly blame all of Islam, and Islamaphobia. Just last week the Religion of Peace killed 178 and wounded 176. October saw 1564 killed. An Islamist professor beat up and dragged his niece because she refused to wear a Hijab. They treat women like 2nd class citizens, at best. They throw gays off tall buildings. The place people in cages and burn them to death.

Perhaps a liberal could explain why it is OK to blame all pro-life people for the random acts of a very few (and we still don’t know the motive of Robert Lewis Dear), yet, cannot even link Islam with the violent acts of a lot of people who are acting in the name of Islam? Anti-extremist Islam people aren’t even attempting to blame all of Islam, using the term “Islamists” to separate the radicals, both violent and otherwise, from the rest. Yes, it is noted that Islam has a problem. It does. But, not all of Islam is being blamed, but, we aren’t even allowed to blame the minority.

We’re apparently not even allowed Free Speech anymore, nor allowed to expose the disgusting practices of Planned Parenthood. Maybe it’s because the far left is following the beliefs of virulent racist Margaret Sanger, who despised Blacks, and would be happy that Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills are killing so many Black babies?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

15 Responses to “Washington Post: The Problem Is Not Selling Baby Parts, But Exposing The Selling Of Baby Parts”

  1. John says:

    “Possible contraindication” we’ll Teach of course ANYTHING is possible
    But
    None of the many investigations done so far has indicated that anything illegal took place, not withstanding the heavily edited videos
    Please not that no unedited videos have ever been given for examination
    Teach there has been a long history of violent religious Christian extremism in this country. The Klan not only hated Blacks but also Catholics and Jews
    I am a bit surprised why you are not more strongly allied with Idlam on this abortion issue
    Teach if abortion is murder do you think Dear’s actions were justified?
    Should the radical right wing religious fundamentalists. Be referred to as “Chrustianists”?
    If “babies” are being murdered in Planned Parenthood clinics as many (including yourself?) say shouldn’t we expect people to do things like Dear did?
    Also when using an incomplete quote such as. ” baby parts” shouldn’t you indicate somehow that this is in fact an incomplete edited quite?
    Probably it would have been more correct to use the whole quote it was only a few more words and would have better shown why Dear felt motivated to kill
    It was because of those heavily edited and publicized videos
    In fact shouldn’t YOU also indicate that those videos were heavily edited?
    Today the Pope will be visiting s mosque in the Central Afrucan Republic where the heavily majority christianists have been killing many Muslims
    Perhaps he and you will speak out over the thousands of witches that African christianists kill each year, primarily through burning alive
    Christianity’s in Africa kill far more people than do Islamists
    A quick Google will confirm that

  2. drowningpuppies says:

    Don’t get insulted, but is your life dedicated to spreading ignorance?

  3. Jeffery says:

    Planned Parenthood was not/is not selling baby parts. They WERE supplying fetal/embryological tissues to medical researchers at cost.

    Mr. Dear may be a wackjob, but he is also a Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government and anti-Obama wackjob.

    Not every Christian, not even every far-right wackjob is violent. Neither are all Muslims.

    The far-right believes that Islam itself and most Muslims are terrorists, but that far-right Christians are not, yet most terrorist incidents in the US are committed by radical far-right, anti-government wackjobs just like Mr. Dear.

    What liberals are trying to get through your lying, thick cementheads is just that point.

    Do you, as decent far-right conservatives, enjoy being lumped in with the likes of Mssrs Dear, Brevik, Rudolph, McVeigh, Dylann Roof etc?

    Well, decent Muslims don’t enjoy being lumped in with throat-slashing Caliphatists, either. See?

  4. Jeffery says:

    Although Trump misspoke lied about NJ Muslims cheering 9/11, it’s clear that a lot of anti-abortion conservatives are cheering the Colorado Springs terrorist attack:

    Here Are All The People Applauding The Planned Parenthood Shooter

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/jacob-geers/2015/11/here-are-all-the-people-applauding-the-planned-parenthood-shooter/

    Much like commenter Dana, many see the bright side of murdering innocents if it interrupts legal abortion. But isn’t that terrorism? Perhaps they were all just trolling. I hope so. It’s hard to imagine any decent anti-abortion conservatives who would wish murder on those with whom they have religious differences.

  5. Jl says:

    What’s the definition of a “far right conservative”? Interesting that most liberals here say “far right” instead of just “conservatives.” Probably just another drama queen ploy from the liberal playbook.

  6. gitarcarver says:

    Here Are All The People Applauding The Planned Parenthood Shooter

    Except that all of them aren’t applauding the shooting. Even if they were, if “all” of the people means 11 tweets, that is not exactly a wave of support.

    It’s hard to imagine any decent anti-abortion conservatives who would wish murder on those with whom they have religious differences.

    Which is why most of the anti-abortion groups have come out against the shooting Jeffery. Perhaps that fact eludes you.

    And if you think that the objection to abortion is only based on religion, you are wrong. There are plenty of atheists and agnostics who are against abortion as it is murder.

    Sorry to burst your little bubble with the truth, but it is clear that your statement is not based on fact and only meant to inflame.

  7. gitarcarver says:

    Mr. Dear may be a wackjob, but he is also a Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government and anti-Obama wackjob.

    Except for the fact that he doesn’t appear to have ever self identified as a Christian, he never spoke with others about his faith, no one ever claimed he was a Christian, and didn’t attend a church, you might be right.

    As it is, you’re just a liar.

  8. Jeffery says:

    gitarcarver typed:

    As it is, you’re just a liar.

    Perhaps you should read William’s complete wackjob link.

    Apology accepted. Go and sin no more.

  9. gitarcarver says:

    Figures that you would try and distance yourself from your own link.

    And by the way, the article now says that the number is down to 9.

    That is quite a total.

    By the way, I did read Teach’s link.

    You need to apologize for your false statements, but we know that you won’t.

    You don’t have the guts or the moral fortitude to do so.

  10. Jeffery says:

    You read it but you missed these parts?

    He’s a non-practicing Christian and he legally bought the guns used in the shooting.

    The younger Dear was raised Baptist, Ross told the New York Times. She said he was not a regular church goer, but he was religious.

    ‘He believed wholeheartedly in the Bible,’ she said, adding that he was never fixated on the book.

    ‘That’s what he always said, he read it cover to cover to cover.’

    I forgive you. Go and bear false witness no more.

    Dear was a Christian. He was anti-abortion, anti-government, anti-Obama, a conservative and owned guns. And he was nuts enough to shoot innocent people.

    That doesn’t mean that every Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government, anti-Obama, conservative with a gun is going to shoot innocent people, but they are worth keeping an eye on.

  11. drowningpuppies says:

    That doesn’t mean that every Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government, anti-Obama, conservative with a gun is going to shoot innocent people, but they are worth keeping an eye on.

    You sometime stumble over the truth, but, as usual, you quickly pick yourself up and carry on as if nothing happened.

  12. gitarcarver says:

    It is so much fun watching you try to talk about things you do not know.

    He’s a non-practicing Christian and he legally bought the guns used in the shooting.

    A “non-practicing Christian” is, by definition, not a Christian.

    The younger Dear was raised Baptist, Ross told the New York Times. She said he was not a regular church goer, but he was religious.

    While there are Christians who are Baptists, being raised a Baptist does not make you a Christian.

    ‘He believed wholeheartedly in the Bible,’ she said, adding that he was never fixated on the book.

    Believing in the Bible does not make you a Christan. Never has.

    ‘That’s what he always said, he read it cover to cover to cover.’

    I have read the Koran and other texts from other religions from cover to cover. That doesn’t mean that I am Muslim.

    Once again, you have been shown to be false and a liar. Wallowing in your ignorance, you still haven’t addressed how 9 people making a statement somehow condemns the rest of the people.

    As I said, you don’t have the morals or the intestinal fortitude to admit when you are wrong.

  13. Deserttrek says:

    gotta luv the logic of the supporter of child abuse and murder J. one or two pro lifers may approve so the whole world is bad , but islam is pure and none of its believers can be blamed for anything when they go on murder sprees.

    funny how those who support murder and child abuse band together, J and the mohammedan murderers

  14. Jeffery says:

    A “non-practicing Christian” is, by definition, not a Christian.

    That you typed that would be funny if it weren’t so stupid.

    Religionists always categorize other cultists who stray as not part of their religion. It’s the classic “No true Scotsman” argument.

    I had a college friend who was a fundamentalist Christian. He was convinced that Baptism only “worked” if it was full immersion. Good people or babies who were only sprinkled or had holy water poured across their head would not find Heaven. Baptists were Christians, Lutherans were not.

    Just because one Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government, anti-Obama, gun lover shot a bunch of people at Planned Parenthood while shouting Allahu akbar “no more baby parts” doesn’t prove all Christian, anti-abortion, anti-government, Obama-hating gun lovers are terrorists. It just means we need to vet them better before selling them a semi-automatic rifle – at least vet them as well as we do a Syrian orphan.

    Of course surveilling Mosques churches would not have detected this particular terrorist.

    What can we do as a society to stop terrorists such as Dylann Roof, Adam Lanza and Robert Dear? Anything?

  15. gitarcarver says:

    That you typed that would be funny if it weren’t so stupid.

    And yet you did not refute the point at all.

    The shooter was not outside Christianity because he did not practice some ritual or did not believe in something that one denomination believes but another does not.

    The man was not a Christian.

    Period.

    I know that you have problems believing that because it goes outside the narrative that you want to portray. As evidenced by your silly rant, you are not ready, willing and perhaps even able to deal with the truth. The fact that you are more comfortable with the lies you willing spread speaks volumes about you.

Pirate's Cove