What’s in them? We don’t know yet. Will they be big? That remains to be seen, but why bother if they are tepid and meaningless?
(The Smoking Gun) Armed with confidential memos to Hillary Clinton that were stolen from the e-mail account of a former White House aide, a hacker has distributed some of the documents to a wide array of congressional aides, political figures, and journalists worldwide.
In a series of weekend e-mail blasts, the hacker known as “Guccifer†disseminated four recent memos to Clinton from Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of the former Secretary of State. (snip)
Most of the e-mail recipients were sent four separate memos that were e-mailed to Clinton by Blumenthal during the past five months. Each memo dealt with assorted developments in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. One memo marked “Confidential†was sent to Clinton on September 12.
Now, according to this these are emails sent to Clinton, no mention of responses. And if they’re from the time period after the attack, what could they show? Perhaps the willingness to stonewall and obfuscate. Color me a bit skeptical. But, then, why bother if they are meaningless?
Of course, Liberals will say this is no big deal, because having our consulate attacked, burned, have Islamist flags raised above it, and 4 Americans killed, including our Ambassador, is much ado over nothing to them.
Can’t wait to see the context of the emails.
context? or content?
The person who should have known the most about the security conditions in Benghazi was the Ambassador. He apparently was unaware of how dangerous it was, as was the Turkish Ambassador who left just 1 hour before the attack.6 months after the attack not ONE person who was there has gone before Congress and testified to anything that looked to be irresponsible. This Benghazi is typical of the rightwing attacks that we see all too often, like the frame up of Menendez 6 days before the last election with the “underage hookers”. That story has finally been proven false. Your post congratulated The Other McCain for his “great” coverage of Hookergate.Haven’t seen a lot of apologies or corrections from mcCain on Hookergate.
Hill must be thrilled to know her version of events will soon be corroborated lol
Wow john, what fantasy world are you living in?
Leon Panetta and JCS General Martin Dempsey testified that not only did they know the situation in Benghazi was dangerous, but that they had done nothing. Ambassador Stevens had made requests for more security but was denied. Previous commanders in the area testified to Congress that they had requested more security but were denied. Panetta testified he told Obama of the attack and Obama told him to “take care of it” despite Panetta having not authority in the molitary chain of command. Panetta also testified that Obama never called him back or checked on what happened. The facts don’t match up with your fantasy world.
As for Martinez, I have no idea why you think the story was false. The “evidence” against the allegations is a alleged affitdavit from a lawyer who doesn’t appear to be a laywer from a prostitute that was not one of the prostitutes Martinez hired and listed her address as a place that doesn’t exist. Sorry, once again yor fantasies don’t match with the facts.
If anyone should apologize for lying and making stuff up, it is you and people of your ilk.
Congratulated? Or simply linked to in one of the Pinup posts? The latter.
But we all know if Benghazi had happened under Bush you would be screeching for heads to roll. Instead, sinceit is Obama, you could care less about dead Americans.
And Stevens, along with others, were begging for more security for months. Everyone knew benghazi was dangerous. The Brits pulled out. The media avoided the place.
Actually, john, you’re an idiot. Plain and simple.
The Menendez issue? The prostitute that came forward and said she was paid? Wasn’t either of the two that were part of the original story. But then, I wager you knew that, and like the Media, didn’t care. It suited a narrative, so you put it forward, hoping no one else knew the actual story behind it.
Very sleazy, you must be very proud of yourself — like the Dems, the only standards you adhere to are Double Standards.
Hypocrite, heal thyself.