Obama Fiscal Cliff Plan: 73% New Taxation

During the campaign and previous rounds of talks, (NMP) Obama pushed $3 in cuts for every $1 in new taxation. Of course, just like happened with Reagan, the tax increases would come now, with the cuts down the road, which would never materialize. During the debate he pushed $2.50 cuts to $1 increases. What’s the reality?

(AEI) President Obama’s opening bid in budget talks with congressional Republicans is a reheating of his 80-page deficit reduction package from September 2011. The president calls it a “balanced” plan. Well, here it is:

Nice big graphic at the link.

Now, according to Obama’s math, his “balanced” plan cuts the projected cumulative debt by $4.4 trillion over ten years with 36% of the reduction coming from $1.6 trillion in tax increases — 80% from wealthier Americans, 20% from business. So, basically, $2 in spending cuts for each $1 in tax hikes. “Balanced.”

But once you begin to dig into the numbers, the plan doesn’t look balanced at all. As the bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted back then:

The Administration claims that the plan would save about $4.4 trillion in total (including interest savings, war savings, and the costs of the jobs proposals). However … counting the war savings is counting a policy that is already in place and is thus a gimmick to be avoided. Taking out the war savings and savings from the discretionary cuts in the Budget Control Act leads to total savings of less than $2 trillion.

Of the supposed savings, then, $1.6 trillion comes from tax hikes and $577 billion comes from spending cuts, not counting saved interest. So 73% of the savings comes from taxes, 27% from spending cuts. That’s $3 of tax hikes for every $1 of spending cuts.

The cuts would never materialize, except, surely, to the military budgets (note, we do need to reduce military expenditures that are wasteful, just like with every federal agency. And surely need to reduce the horrible waste which creates surplus through the appropriations process, which needs to be reformed, which I somewhat cover in this post).

Interestingly, he also includes the cost of his “American Jobs Act” as $447 billion dollars. Another attempt at stimulus, despite all the others failing, but, he thinks it will pass this time. And actually expects $320 billion in “health savings”, despite the reality that ObamaCare will vastly increase the government’s costs.

Also, we see a reduction of $992 billion which would include disaster relief reductions.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

RSS feed

You can login to comment with:

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

5 Comments

Comment by Gumball_Brains Subscribed to comments via email
2012-11-15 17:00:09

So, basically, $2 in spending cuts for each $1 in tax hikes. “Balanced.”

But once you begin to dig into the numbers, the plan doesn’t look balanced at all.

Actually, isn’t that already nearly a 3:1 balanced approach? 1.6 times 3 is 4.8, right? So, its 2.75 difference.

Of the supposed savings, then, $1.6 trillion comes from tax hikes and $577 billion comes from spending cuts, not counting saved interest. So 73% of the savings comes from taxes, 27% from spending cuts. That’s $3 of tax hikes for every $1 of spending cuts.

That’s 2.77:1 IT’S STILL 3:1 no matter how you slice it.

And yep, add on the cost of ObamaCare and you now have 6-10:1.

Balanced. In a socialist’s wet dream.

 
Comment by William Teach
2012-11-15 17:09:05

We’re starting to look more like the old USSR economic model rather than Greece’s

 
Comment by Gumball_Brains Subscribed to comments via email
2012-11-15 20:37:50

Yeah, look how well that economy of government-proportions turned out. And, I hear its been going along swimmingly over the last 35 years since. Can’t get much better than that, right?

Good thing we have Greece and USSR to look up to.

 
Comment by William Teach
2012-11-15 21:07:00

But, hey, on the bright side, Obama will soon nail those dirty evil rich people who provide jobs and capital investment and stuff. That’ll show ‘em!

 
Comment by Gumball_Brains Subscribed to comments via email
2012-11-15 21:17:09

Yeah. All for one week of a balanced budget.
woopie

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Bad Behavior has blocked 11482 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE