What is “all the data” that you’re talking about? What data points “away from global warming”?

Isn’t it interesting that all the data points away from global warming or climate change or whatever we’re calling it today and yet it doesn’t get reported. These people have to know they’re wrong. They just want the taxes and power that pushing this agenda will afford them.

As the article points out, and we have seen previously, 2,500 scientists have resigned from the IPCC in protest.

Um… actually, the article says that “some” of the 2,500 have resigned. I’ve heard of two or three, one whose complaints were unfounded, as the final report didn’t contain the offending statements, and another who was upset about a statement on mosquitos.

And the 31,000 who signed the petition that says there is no convincing evidence that Man is to blame.

I’ll never understand why you and others continue to trot out this completely debunked list. This is filled with errors, and is definitely not a list of actual scientists, much less climate scientists.

While our emissions are increasing fast each year, satellite measurements show the world’s temperatures have still not risen above the 1998 record, and have actually fallen since 2002.

There was also a big dip in the 60′s, but guess what? It went back up. Only a politician and a blogger would draw the conclusion that we’re headed for global cooling, based solely on temperature trends.

AGW took a legitimate occurrence, a warming period that had been going on since the 1850’s, part of a larger warming trend that has been going on for 18,000 years, and turned it into being Man’s fault.

This is a common misunderstanding among you deniers. The reality is that you’re putting the cart before the horse. The theory of AGW was first proposed by Arrhenius far before there was any significant increase in temperatures. We’re only recently able to collect data and analyze it in order to test this theory.

Let me ask you this question:

Do you believe that greenhouse gases warm the planet?