<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Napolitano Ignored Civil Liberties Lawyers For &#8220;Right Wing Extremists&#8221; Hit Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/</link>
	<description>If we don&#039;t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don&#039;t believe in it at all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/comment-page-1/#comment-123253</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=8250#comment-123253</guid>
		<description>Interesting how Napolitano uses McVeigh, but fails to mention veteran and massive communist Lee Harvey Oswald.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how Napolitano uses McVeigh, but fails to mention veteran and massive communist Lee Harvey Oswald.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaganite Republican Resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/comment-page-1/#comment-123245</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaganite Republican Resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=8250#comment-123245</guid>
		<description>Napolitano&#039;s use of Oklahoma City in 1995 certainly is an intriguing example of how US military veterans are supposedly some sort of threat to us all.

That bombing was a single event, staged almost 14 years ago- hasn&#039;t Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn&#039;t keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn&#039;t that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?

Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes, either... while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.

So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn&#039;t have been a willing participant is such a sham report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napolitano&#8217;s use of Oklahoma City in 1995 certainly is an intriguing example of how US military veterans are supposedly some sort of threat to us all.</p>
<p>That bombing was a single event, staged almost 14 years ago- hasn&#8217;t Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn&#8217;t keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn&#8217;t that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?</p>
<p>Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes, either&#8230; while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.</p>
<p>So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn&#8217;t have been a willing participant is such a sham report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaganite Republican Resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/comment-page-1/#comment-123244</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaganite Republican Resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=8250#comment-123244</guid>
		<description>Napolitano&#039;s use of Oklahoma City in 1995 certainly is an intriguing example of how US military veterans are supposedly some sort of threat to us all.

That bombing was a single event, staged almost 14 years ago- hasn&#039;t Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn&#039;t keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn&#039;t that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?

Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes, either... while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.

So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn&#039;t have been a willing participant is such a sham report.

http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Napolitano&#8217;s use of Oklahoma City in 1995 certainly is an intriguing example of how US military veterans are supposedly some sort of threat to us all.</p>
<p>That bombing was a single event, staged almost 14 years ago- hasn&#8217;t Al Qaida staged hundreds of attacks on US interests since then? Why so little mention of them since she was appointed three months ago- isn&#8217;t keeping a lid on those medieval savages 80% of her job description? Isn&#8217;t that why the Department of Homeland Security created in the first-place?</p>
<p>Apparently there is no bounds to what government assets Obama will prostitute for his own purposes, either&#8230; while neglecting daunting, actual threats in the meantime.</p>
<p>So all who wondered why Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now have their answer: a serious choice who would have focused upon real terrorist threats -not imaginary, partisan ones- like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani, wouldn&#8217;t have been a willing participant is such a sham report.</p>
<p><a href="http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N Waff</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/comment-page-1/#comment-123232</link>
		<dc:creator>N Waff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=8250#comment-123232</guid>
		<description>Dear President Obama,

In 2004, congress introduced legislation called the &quot;End Racial Profiling Act&quot; to stop the offensive discriminatory act of stereotyping ordinary citizens as criminals.   The ACLU said this act was &quot;a key step in the fight to ensure that no one in America is subject to law enforcement encounters based on crude bias.&quot;   Now, your administration, under Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, has committed the same criminal act against our citizens, denying them equal protection and, instead, holding them under criminal suspicion because they hold a conservative political position.  This action taken by your administration is offensive, un-American and has already eroded the trust between citizens, the federal government and law enforcement.  It needs to be retracted and the appropriate disciplinary action needs to be taken against those who implemented this federally sanctioned discrimination.  I am requesting your prompt attention to this matter.

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear President Obama,</p>
<p>In 2004, congress introduced legislation called the &#8220;End Racial Profiling Act&#8221; to stop the offensive discriminatory act of stereotyping ordinary citizens as criminals.   The ACLU said this act was &#8220;a key step in the fight to ensure that no one in America is subject to law enforcement encounters based on crude bias.&#8221;   Now, your administration, under Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, has committed the same criminal act against our citizens, denying them equal protection and, instead, holding them under criminal suspicion because they hold a conservative political position.  This action taken by your administration is offensive, un-American and has already eroded the trust between citizens, the federal government and law enforcement.  It needs to be retracted and the appropriate disciplinary action needs to be taken against those who implemented this federally sanctioned discrimination.  I am requesting your prompt attention to this matter.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/04/17/napolitano-ignored-civil-liberties-lawyers-for-right-wing-extremists-hit-job/comment-page-1/#comment-123229</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=8250#comment-123229</guid>
		<description>when will the jumping barracuda be replaced ? Why do you hate Sarah ? Why do your archives with Sarah show NO ENTRIES  since Dec 31st ? Why was Saeahcudda thrown under the bus ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will the jumping barracuda be replaced ? Why do you hate Sarah ? Why do your archives with Sarah show NO ENTRIES  since Dec 31st ? Why was Saeahcudda thrown under the bus ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.thepiratescove.us @ 2012-02-12 17:19:09 by W3 Total Cache -->
