Okay, I get it. You won’t admit the report says what it says. I just wonder if you only believe that the report is good because Obama is president.

Okay, it just says what it says, huh? Look, the government is not out to get you. You can take the tin foil hat off now. If you really think Obama had anything to do with this report, you really are a nut. The report is about violent extremists. It’s warning law enforcement about the possibility of more Poplawskis. If you don’t get it, then I don’t know what else to say. This is not about you. Get over yourself.

It is the soldier, not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press.

It is the soldier, not the poet,
who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the soldier, not the campus organizer,
who has given us the freedom to demonstrate.

It is the soldier, not the lawyer,
who has given us the right to a fair trial.

It is the soldier,
who salutes the flag,
who serves under the flag,
and whose coffin is draped by the flag,
who allows the protester to burn the flag.

By Father Dennis Edward O’Brien, USMC

You don’t get it.

I don’t get what? My point is that YOU don’t get it, “it” being the purpose of the DHS assessment. So what is it that I don’t get?

Sorry, Reasic, you cannot blame this report on Bush, even though you clearly blame him for, well, everything.

Um… can you show me where I blamed this report on Bush? I don’t remember saying that.

The report is about singling out specific people and specific viewpoints that federal law enforcement has been told by their leader that the people who have those viewpoints ARE dangerous and ARE supposed to be considered suspects as they are inclined to be terrorists. That’s what the report says.

NO!!! You have it backwards, Ogre! The report first warns about terrorists and extremists, and then details some of the viewpoints held by these groups. The viewpoints were not used to define the meaning of “extremist”. Besides, the DHS also published an assessment on “leftwing extremists” in January. This isn’t about you, unless you’re plotting acts of violence.

As for the report, you don’t understand it. The report is about singling out specific people and specific viewpoints that federal law enforcement has been told by their leader that the people who have those viewpoints ARE dangerous and ARE supposed to be considered suspects as they are inclined to be terrorists. That’s what the report says.