<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cantor Calls Embryonic Stem Cell Reverals A &#8220;Distraction&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/09/cantor-calls-embryonic-stem-cell-reverals-a-distraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/09/cantor-calls-embryonic-stem-cell-reverals-a-distraction/</link>
	<description>If we don&#039;t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don&#039;t believe in it at all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:03:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/09/cantor-calls-embryonic-stem-cell-reverals-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-122704</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7422#comment-122704</guid>
		<description>Ah, you mean like those privately funded scientists, who argued that tobacco was good for you?  Hey, what do you think would be the motivation for a corporation to fund scientific research?  This might be the most ironic argument made by deniers.  You have on your side, scientists who are funded by the coal and oil industries, and you have the tenacity to claim that it is the publicly funded scientists who are biased.  Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you mean like those privately funded scientists, who argued that tobacco was good for you?  Hey, what do you think would be the motivation for a corporation to fund scientific research?  This might be the most ironic argument made by deniers.  You have on your side, scientists who are funded by the coal and oil industries, and you have the tenacity to claim that it is the publicly funded scientists who are biased.  Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/09/cantor-calls-embryonic-stem-cell-reverals-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-122702</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7422#comment-122702</guid>
		<description>I mean privately funded companies, rather then those receiving funds from the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean privately funded companies, rather then those receiving funds from the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/09/cantor-calls-embryonic-stem-cell-reverals-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-122697</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7422#comment-122697</guid>
		<description>Just for clarification, what do you mean when you say &quot;private researchers&quot;?  Give me an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for clarification, what do you mean when you say &#8220;private researchers&#8221;?  Give me an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.thepiratescove.us @ 2012-02-12 16:46:13 by W3 Total Cache -->
