<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AGW Today: Jacking Taxes With C&amp;T While Warming Is On Hold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/04/agw-today-jacking-taxes-with-ct-while-warming-is-on-hold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/04/agw-today-jacking-taxes-with-ct-while-warming-is-on-hold/</link>
	<description>If we don&#039;t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don&#039;t believe in it at all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/04/agw-today-jacking-taxes-with-ct-while-warming-is-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-122676</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7357#comment-122676</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yet, you, like most of the rest of the true believers, want everyone else to change their lives, you just don’t want to change yours. Why is that? Kinda hard to take you and others serious when you don’t walk the talk.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

1. I believe the phrase is &quot;walk the walk&quot;, but I digress.

2. I&#039;ve given you a list of the steps I&#039;ve taken.  I&#039;ve asked you over and over to give me some specifics on what I should be doing differently.  By refusing to get into specifics, you have continually proven that you are only spouting talking points.  There is no substance here.  Any time I bring substance to the discussion, you run.  I wonder why THAT is?

3. You always talk about what most of the &quot;true believers&quot; do, but again, you&#039;re just generalizing and speculating.  You really have no idea.  You&#039;re just pulling **** out of your ***, to put it bluntly.  Let&#039;s talk about what you DO know.  Oh, wait.  That conversation would end very shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yet, you, like most of the rest of the true believers, want everyone else to change their lives, you just don’t want to change yours. Why is that? Kinda hard to take you and others serious when you don’t walk the talk.</p></blockquote>
<p>1. I believe the phrase is &#8220;walk the walk&#8221;, but I digress.</p>
<p>2. I&#8217;ve given you a list of the steps I&#8217;ve taken.  I&#8217;ve asked you over and over to give me some specifics on what I should be doing differently.  By refusing to get into specifics, you have continually proven that you are only spouting talking points.  There is no substance here.  Any time I bring substance to the discussion, you run.  I wonder why THAT is?</p>
<p>3. You always talk about what most of the &#8220;true believers&#8221; do, but again, you&#8217;re just generalizing and speculating.  You really have no idea.  You&#8217;re just pulling **** out of your ***, to put it bluntly.  Let&#8217;s talk about what you DO know.  Oh, wait.  That conversation would end very shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/04/agw-today-jacking-taxes-with-ct-while-warming-is-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-122661</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7357#comment-122661</guid>
		<description>Talk about only reading and believing what you want. Yet, you, like most of the rest of the true believers, want everyone else to change their lives, you just don&#039;t want to change yours. Why is that? Kinda hard to take you and others serious when you don&#039;t walk the talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about only reading and believing what you want. Yet, you, like most of the rest of the true believers, want everyone else to change their lives, you just don&#8217;t want to change yours. Why is that? Kinda hard to take you and others serious when you don&#8217;t walk the talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasic</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2009/03/04/agw-today-jacking-taxes-with-ct-while-warming-is-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-122656</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=7357#comment-122656</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Um, oops? How is that possible? Could it be that natural forces are far more powerful then anything Mankind is doing, and that CO2 is not as big a deal as the Climahysterics tell us (right before they get in their SUVs and crank the A/C up to go buy Arugula)?

Of course, the article does end with a bit of that typical hysteria. Check it out and laugh.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL!!!  Mr. &quot;I only read what I want to read&quot; can&#039;t see the forest for the trees again.

The article is half description of the issue and half explanation, and you quote the first half and write the second off as &quot;typical hysteria&quot;.  Hilarious!  You ask how that is possible (as if you really wanted to know), and then completely write off the possible explanations given.  What a joke.

You are the most close-minded, partisan, intellectually incurious person I think I&#039;ve ever seen.  You don&#039;t have a CLUE what you&#039;re talking about, but you&#039;re still more than willing to spew talking points and conjecture at the drop of a hat.  Please at least inform yourself to the point that you can put up a semi-intellectual argument in your defense.  You are so easily debunked, and you haven&#039;t the slightest idea how to respond to the simplest of criticisms.  It&#039;s laughable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Um, oops? How is that possible? Could it be that natural forces are far more powerful then anything Mankind is doing, and that CO2 is not as big a deal as the Climahysterics tell us (right before they get in their SUVs and crank the A/C up to go buy Arugula)?</p>
<p>Of course, the article does end with a bit of that typical hysteria. Check it out and laugh.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL!!!  Mr. &#8220;I only read what I want to read&#8221; can&#8217;t see the forest for the trees again.</p>
<p>The article is half description of the issue and half explanation, and you quote the first half and write the second off as &#8220;typical hysteria&#8221;.  Hilarious!  You ask how that is possible (as if you really wanted to know), and then completely write off the possible explanations given.  What a joke.</p>
<p>You are the most close-minded, partisan, intellectually incurious person I think I&#8217;ve ever seen.  You don&#8217;t have a CLUE what you&#8217;re talking about, but you&#8217;re still more than willing to spew talking points and conjecture at the drop of a hat.  Please at least inform yourself to the point that you can put up a semi-intellectual argument in your defense.  You are so easily debunked, and you haven&#8217;t the slightest idea how to respond to the simplest of criticisms.  It&#8217;s laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.thepiratescove.us @ 2012-02-12 12:44:51 by W3 Total Cache -->
