Comments on: Bush Compares Obama To Nazi Appeasers, HuffPo, Other Dems, Go Apeshat

By: Stephen Fox, Santa Fe, New Mexico USA

Stephen Fox, Santa Fe, New Mexico USA — Mon, 26 May 2008 01:18:54 +0000

Some ideas about Gov. Richardson as next Secretary of State; Bush’s utter hypocrisy in describing Obama as “appeaser” in address to Israeli Parliament

Please share these with your readers, viewers, friends, family, and
colleagues, if you like them….

Some background on a discussion on who the next USA Secretary of State might
be: http://www.prlog.org/10074647-new-mexico-governor-richardson-best-usa-
secretary-of-state-2008-complete-ideal-democrat-dream-team.html

A brilliant look at the real history of George’s grandfather Prescott Bush’s
financial support and participation in the formation of Nazi Germany, making
it absurd and hypocritical for Bush last week during his address to the
Israeli Knesset, to critize Obama as “appeaser,” for stating that he would
be willing to speak with President of Iran with no preconditions:
http://www.prlog.org/10073726-the-bushes-and-hitler-
appeasement-by-robert-parry-and-consortium-news.html

FROM STEPHEN FOX
Managing Editor, Santa Fe Sun News
Founder, New Millennium Fine Art, a Santa Fe Gallery since 1980

By: If the “appeasement” shoe fits…. | Right Commentary

If the “appeasement” shoe fits…. | Right Commentary — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:02:14 +0000

[...] Den.. A Change in the Wind: Bush Links Obama to Appeasement: What Obama Should Ha.. Bush Compares Obama To Nazi Appeasers, HuffPo, Other Dems, Go Apeshat &raqu.. Barack Obama » Obama says Bush falsely accused him of appeasement (AP.. All Things Democrat [...]

By: John Ryan

John Ryan — Fri, 16 May 2008 13:12:04 +0000

Is Bush still relevant ? Tp whom ?
He has badly damaged the Republican Party.

By: William Teach

William Teach — Fri, 16 May 2008 13:00:22 +0000

Silke, diplomacy is great. But, should a president of the USA negotiate with the president of Iran and other terrorist leaders one on one him or herself, with no conditions? No. And then you start getting in to the whole “it elevates a pissant terrorist group, country, and or leader” issue.

The point is how those diplomatic meetings and appeasements went with Hitler.

Yeah, it would be a number 4, MBP. Good catch.

By: manbearpig

manbearpig — Fri, 16 May 2008 10:20:19 +0000

Would this be equivalent to #4 on the 8 Stages for liberals?

By: manbearpig

manbearpig — Fri, 16 May 2008 10:18:21 +0000

Because history has proved that you can change a country’s entire political philosophy by sitting down with them and sharing a cup of General Mills International Coffee. Nice one BO.

First of all…. explain to me how Bush’s staement is not accurate. Second, I cannot recall one instance (at least in recent history) where discussion alone led to any kind of reversal of policy.

By: Silke

Silke — Fri, 16 May 2008 03:29:44 +0000

I think if we can we should try to resolve our differences with Iran diplomatically, economically and politically.

As far as I’m concerned this seems pretty reasonable to me:

We need to figure out a way to develop some leverage … and then sit down and talk with them. If there is going to be a discussion, then they need something, too. We can’t go to a discussion and be completely the demander, with them not feeling that they need anything from us.