Comments on: Global Warming Today: Babies Not Welcome

By: darthcrUSAderworldtour2007

darthcrUSAderworldtour2007 — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:07:18 +0000

The defeatocrats and their party of 48 million slaughtered babies… no kidding!

By: Interplanetary: Open Trackbacks thru Tuesday « Wolf Pangloss

Interplanetary: Open Trackbacks thru Tuesday « Wolf Pangloss — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:14 +0000

[...] Global Warming Today: Babies Not Welcome — Pirate’s Cove // Monday, December 10, 2007 at 13:20 [...]

By: Post of the Day for December 10, 2007 | Adam's Blog

Post of the Day for December 10, 2007 | Adam's Blog — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:45:49 +0000

[...] Pingback by Global Warming Today: Babies Not Welcome — Pirate’s Cove [...]

By: Ogre

Ogre — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:06:45 +0000

Geez. Literally paying people to get sterilized. Well at least it’s “For the Planet” and not “For the Aryan Race” so it’s okay, right?

If this doesn’t just add more support to prove what “Global Warming” really is: a religion to get cash.

By: William Teach

William Teach — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:52:53 +0000

I remember that lady a few weeks ago who sterilized herself to help stop climate change. Weird people, 5 short of a six pack.

They will rarely do it themselves: it is usually something for everyone else to do.

However, there are a few liberal wackjobs who espouse forced depopulation methods, and others who follow right along.

By: Kristen McFarland

Kristen McFarland — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:32:05 +0000

I haven’t read this entire thing, but I have a prediction that the next thing the envirowackos will insist upon is that since humanity is infesting the planet, and feeling especially guiltridden, we should all commit suicide to save the Earth. There are already total whackjobs out there sterilizing themselves to prevent their contributing CO2 emissions by producing more carbon-based units i.e. babies. My response to these demented ones insisting on wholesale mass suicide will be, you first and then I’ll think for a nanosecond as far as acquiescence is concerned. The answer would be an emphatic no, but I would not want them to think I wasn’t paying attention.