Comments on: Global Warming Today: Welcome To Exotic Bali!

By: irtexas

irtexas — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:13:24 +0000

I keep getting this mental picture of altheblobgorical paddling backwards in his canoe as fast as he can and getting closer to the big waterfalls. I wish I could draw a picture. Unfortunatly any 5 y/o can beat me in stick figures. I guess I have to work on that.

By: irtexas

irtexas — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:47:09 +0000

Teach,

Someone asked me last weekend why I’m not concerned about the rise in earth temps? Well since it only amounts to 1 degree every 850,000 years that they would need to catch me on the next go round. By then I may actually care. Until then cans, paper, plastic. Recycle. Thats all I can do. No matter what they say it still comes down to the basic 4 seasons.

By: Stacy

Stacy — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:47:44 +0000

I’m just so happy I have hobbies to occupy my time.

By: William Teach

William Teach — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:15:02 +0000

Silke, the list has been updated constantly. It was around 17K last March (http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3568). They would probably say that it is a hysteric report by a bunch of hysterics.

And, yes, the models are pretty much the same. Talk to meteorologists and climatoligists.

Now, now, joated, we wouldn’t want to ruin their tax payer funded vacations, now, would we?

What would be hilarious would be for Krakatao to blow, dropping the world wide temps by about 2 degree F. Oh, wait, that would not be climate, because only Man can change the climate.

By: joated

joated — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:45:50 +0000

I’m rooting for a tsunami. Poetic justice and all that.

By: Silke

Silke — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:26:52 +0000

Teach, that list is at least six years old. I would like to know what they have to say about the Fourth Assessment Report.

Teach said: You may be concerned, but, you, like most of the rest, will simply ignore the blatent hypocrisy.

I’m not ignoring it. I’m openly agreeing with you.

Teach said: they use the same computer models that cannot accurately predict weather 10 days out to predict the end of the Earth 50-100 years out.

They are not the same models and the fact that you cannot distinguish the difference really discredits your own position, Teach.

By: William Teach

William Teach — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:41:45 +0000

If you are only aware of a handful, then your head has been stuck in the sand, Silke. There are tons and tons. How about 19,000? http://www.oism.org/pproject/

You may be concerned, but, you, like most of the rest, will simply ignore the blatent hypocrisy.

Conjecture is pretty much all they have, irtexas. Their hockey stick graph has been discredited, and they use the same computer models that cannot accurately predict weather 10 days out to predict the end of the Earth 50-100 years out.

By: irtexas

irtexas — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:48:51 +0000

Since the algorical said last week to a reporter that he never said facts it was his conjecture that this was what would happen I think he can just conjecture him self off the planet. What an idiot.

By: Silke

Silke — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:02:31 +0000

Teach said: What about all the ones who disagree with the ones who are involved in writing the report, Silke?

I am aware of only a handful of scientists who disagree with the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report. However none of these scientists have provided any counter evidence or any peer-reviewed study to shows why the IPCC’s conclusions are wrong. I have asked you for this repeatedly and you continue to ignore the question (again). It is the weight of ALL the evidence and the fact that those who disagree can provide none of their own that persuades me.

Teach said: Why are you not upset that all these people flew to the exotic vacation spot of Bali

I am concerned about the private jets. It’s a legitimate issue, which is why I commented on it above. Talk about ignoring things…

By: irtexas

irtexas — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 08:55:56 +0000

I’m not getting the error messages anymore. Yehaa.