<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Doe Legislation Introduced: Not What You Think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/05/15/john-doe-legislation-introduced-not-what-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/05/15/john-doe-legislation-introduced-not-what-you-think/</link>
	<description>Free societies are societies in which the right of dissent is protected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:43:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/05/15/john-doe-legislation-introduced-not-what-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-103649</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 01:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3892#comment-103649</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about what benefits them politically, regardless of who else it hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about what benefits them politically, regardless of who else it hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perri Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/05/15/john-doe-legislation-introduced-not-what-you-think/comment-page-1/#comment-103624</link>
		<dc:creator>Perri Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3892#comment-103624</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it interesting that the left would probably strictly interpret the commerce clause of the Constitution to limit Congress&#039; power to grant immunity in cases like this to the transportation systems.

At the same time they interpret the commerce clause quite liberally whenever it covers their pet causes, such as environmentalism.

Convenient isn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting that the left would probably strictly interpret the commerce clause of the Constitution to limit Congress&#8217; power to grant immunity in cases like this to the transportation systems.</p>
<p>At the same time they interpret the commerce clause quite liberally whenever it covers their pet causes, such as environmentalism.</p>
<p>Convenient isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
