<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi Wants To Take Away Your Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/</link>
	<description>If we don&#039;t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don&#039;t believe in it at all</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96776</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nancy Pelosi to Undermine Free Speech...&lt;/strong&gt;

Will Pelosi’s plot apply to bloggers?

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nancy Pelosi to Undermine Free Speech&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Will Pelosi’s plot apply to bloggers?</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96687</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96687</guid>
		<description>Exactly right, Jeff. Kudos.

Wolfie, apparently you failed to read what the Bill includes, and what this post is about. Take the partisan blinders off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly right, Jeff. Kudos.</p>
<p>Wolfie, apparently you failed to read what the Bill includes, and what this post is about. Take the partisan blinders off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96670</link>
		<dc:creator>wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96670</guid>
		<description>Ms. Pelosi will do the opposite...she will lead the charge to reinstate the rights the scum occupying our government have already taken away.

You nutjobs are hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Pelosi will do the opposite&#8230;she will lead the charge to reinstate the rights the scum occupying our government have already taken away.</p>
<p>You nutjobs are hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff H</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96668</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96668</guid>
		<description>I sent the following email to Pelosi about this abomination; needless to say, I only received a canned &quot;thank you for contacting us&quot; reply.

My email:

According to this article at Human Events Online [&quot;Pelosi Targets
Grassroots Freedom of Speech&quot; [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18510], it appears you
would like for me to register so that I will be allowed to encourage
fellow private citizens to take various position on issues and advocate for positions myself.

So, here goes:

ORGANIZATION: I am not an organization, I am a private citizen of the
United States of America, with the Constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of speech, which includes both advocating for positions and
encouraging others to do the same and act in concert in so doing.

EXPENDITURES: The amount of money I spend--on ANYTHING, including
political activities not otherwise already covered by burdensome--and
most likely, unconstitional tax regulations--is my busines, and none of yours.

CONGRESS PERSONS/TARGETS OF ADVOCACY EFFORTS: Whomever I damn well
please to &quot;target&quot; with my advocacy efforts, up to and including the
Speaker of the House of Representatives.  And for the record, remember: &quot;target&quot; can, and in this case does, mean &quot;contact for purposes of communication&quot; only.

POLICY ISSUES ADVOCATED: Whatever I damn well please.

Let me wrap up by saying, as cordially as I can, you are a sanctimonious bitch and I will advocate tirelessly on behalf of efforts to kill this ill-thought out effort to destroy the First Amendment protections of freedom of speech.

Is that clear enough for you?

--
Jeff H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent the following email to Pelosi about this abomination; needless to say, I only received a canned &#8220;thank you for contacting us&#8221; reply.</p>
<p>My email:</p>
<p>According to this article at Human Events Online ["Pelosi Targets<br />
Grassroots Freedom of Speech" [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18510], it appears you<br />
would like for me to register so that I will be allowed to encourage<br />
fellow private citizens to take various position on issues and advocate for positions myself.</p>
<p>So, here goes:</p>
<p>ORGANIZATION: I am not an organization, I am a private citizen of the<br />
United States of America, with the Constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of speech, which includes both advocating for positions and<br />
encouraging others to do the same and act in concert in so doing.</p>
<p>EXPENDITURES: The amount of money I spend&#8211;on ANYTHING, including<br />
political activities not otherwise already covered by burdensome&#8211;and<br />
most likely, unconstitional tax regulations&#8211;is my busines, and none of yours.</p>
<p>CONGRESS PERSONS/TARGETS OF ADVOCACY EFFORTS: Whomever I damn well<br />
please to &#8220;target&#8221; with my advocacy efforts, up to and including the<br />
Speaker of the House of Representatives.  And for the record, remember: &#8220;target&#8221; can, and in this case does, mean &#8220;contact for purposes of communication&#8221; only.</p>
<p>POLICY ISSUES ADVOCATED: Whatever I damn well please.</p>
<p>Let me wrap up by saying, as cordially as I can, you are a sanctimonious bitch and I will advocate tirelessly on behalf of efforts to kill this ill-thought out effort to destroy the First Amendment protections of freedom of speech.</p>
<p>Is that clear enough for you?</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Jeff H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96666</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96666</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll have to see if the Lefties even pay attention to this. Kos will go ballistic if he sees it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll have to see if the Lefties even pay attention to this. Kos will go ballistic if he sees it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chief RZ</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96649</link>
		<dc:creator>Chief RZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96649</guid>
		<description>This proposal would run right into the first amendment.  The President could veto.  The Supreme Court could block on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.  This reminds me of the democrats attempts at limiting our 2nd amendment rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This proposal would run right into the first amendment.  The President could veto.  The Supreme Court could block on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.  This reminds me of the democrats attempts at limiting our 2nd amendment rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrapiron</title>
		<link>http://www.thepiratescove.us/2007/01/02/pelosi-wants-to-take-away-your-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-96634</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrapiron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepiratescove.us/?p=3305#comment-96634</guid>
		<description>It seems this would either put KOS and DU out of business of those running the sites in jail for a long sentence. Most idiotic ideas backfire and hurt the one with the grand scheme the most. Peeeloshi is about to lose a lot of left wing anti-american friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems this would either put KOS and DU out of business of those running the sites in jail for a long sentence. Most idiotic ideas backfire and hurt the one with the grand scheme the most. Peeeloshi is about to lose a lot of left wing anti-american friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.thepiratescove.us @ 2012-02-12 14:51:38 by W3 Total Cache -->
